Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 January 2007 11:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth Butler Hi all, The staff at our museum have changed their water extinguisher to a foam one for the store room they keep the oil paintings in, as they thought the foam would do less damage to the paintings if it had to be used. As both these extinguishers are water based, I questioned whether this is actually the case. Can anyone tell me whether a dry powder extinguisher is likely to damage oil paintings? I realise that the paintings are class A, and water is the ideal extinguishant, but we are talking about items of great value. What do you think? Thanks Gareth
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 January 2007 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh You can get Dry Powder extinguishers which are suitable for class A fires. How likely are the paintings to catch fire? Would they be caught up in a fire or would they be the seat of the fire? Personally I would ask the local Fire Brigade and my Insurance company for advice. No matter how valuable the paintings are, people should not put themselves at risk fighting fires (apart from small fires) - get the brigade in.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 January 2007 12:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philby' Gareth Agree with Gary's last comments....let the Fire & Rescue Service deal with the fire. I know when I worked in Museums & Galleries their advice (WYF&RS), (and that of the Arts Council, Museums, libraries and Archives) its much easier to restore a waterlogged painting than a pile of ashes, and there's no way to restore people. Philby'
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 January 2007 12:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth Butler Hi. Thanks for your comments which I agree with. Obviously, the museum staff priorities are to evacuate themselves and visitors first and foremost. I was trying to ascertain whether the chemicals that make up a dry powder extinguisher are equally as harmful to the paintings as water, or not. Regards Gareth
Admin  
#5 Posted : 05 January 2007 12:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim Depending on the value of your paintings I would suggest looking at automatic fire detection and a system of flooding the compartment with a gas/vapour type of extinguishing medium. They leave no trace and would not damage anything. Your evacuation system would need to ensure all persons have left the area prior to the system actuating, therefore a manual system may be appropriate.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 05 January 2007 12:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philby' Sorry Gareth, forgot to respond to the last part...simple answer is...quite possibly. The reason I cannot be more specific is that it really depends on the medium used to do the paintings, how they are framed, whether they are contained behind glass, the material painted on...but generally, I would say that standard prowder would be a nightmare. Philby'
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.