Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 02 February 2007 10:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John P
Here's one for a Friday. How far does Channel 4's duty of care towards residents of the Big Brother House extend? When it became apparent that the Shilpa/Jade/Jo etc. incident was becoming an international incident, and that potentially, the health, safety and welfare of those involved could be compromised (death threats, nervous breakdowns etc.) shouldn't Channel 4 have prevented further potential harm by letting those involved know what was happening? Given that they have a delay in live broadcasting primarily to prevent slanderous comments from being broadcast, shouldn't this have been used as a control measure to prevent further potential harm to the residents?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 02 February 2007 10:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter MacDonald
Not really an answer but why has this burned so deep into our psyche. Who actually cares? This horrible low brow, PC media manipulated, non incident has taken up too much of our time already. Can we please not discuss it in this forum.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 02 February 2007 10:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John P
Didn't say I cared Peter. I agree with all that you say in fact that's my point. How far can you harm someone for the purposes of so called entertainment.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 02 February 2007 10:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason911
I have to agree with Peter on this one. There is no such thing as bad publicity and I despair at how many hypocritical easily led people have been suckered into this total non event(That is in no way directed at the writer of this thread).

B.B and all involved are laughing all the way to the bank!

Jay
Admin  
#5 Posted : 02 February 2007 11:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MetalMan
I must admit that although I usually steer clear of dismal little programmes like this I watched it just to see what all the fuss was about. Hopefully it will fade away after this incident and never come back.Hopefully those god awful phone in quiz shows will get banned soon as well. Just another form of mind control for the masses in my opinion, feed us all with a diet of mindless drivel and sooner or later we will loose the ability to think and question for ourselves.
That's my lot on the subject.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 02 February 2007 11:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Joe Doc
John,

There are many forms of entertainment and activities which can lead to participants having injuries.

The term 'Volenti non fit injuria ' comes to mind.

The participants of this game, I assume receive a full briefing or indeed will have seen the show before and are analysed by psychiatrists (apparently) to ensure they are of sound mind before they take part.

That being said I agree that the bods who make/ edit BB knew exactly what they were doing with the editing but it backfired on them.

May the force be with you!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 02 February 2007 11:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Younger
I say stop watching such trivial hog wash, bring back little house on the prairre, or Dangermouse and other quality shows!!

real T.V.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 02 February 2007 11:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Meiklejohn
I don't think volentia non fit injuria would apply -

as thjere would be a clear duty of care
it is a workplace
they are doing it for financial reward

however if you were to board up the house, cover it with petrol and set it a light with every employee of endemol and all the previous house mates, you may be able to use necessity as your defence!

Ahh that friday feeling.....
Admin  
#9 Posted : 04 February 2007 10:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Freddie Davros
Thank you to John for raising this issue.

To be honest, I'm shocked at Peter's suggestion that we shouldn't care about it. Are Shilpa Shetty, Jade Goody and Jo O'Meara somehow less than real people for choosing to take part in Celebrity Big Brother? And does this sub-human status mean that they're not entitled to the same health and safety at work protection as the rest of us? I hate to say it, but to me, that sounds very similar to Nazi justification for slaughtering the Jews.

Here are the facts as I see it (please forgive any inaccuracies caused by misinterpreting of or by the press). Jade Goody was in the Priory for a week after leaving the house. Jo O'Meara has been under the constant watch of psychiatrists in her hotel room. To the best of our knowledge, both of these people were fit and healthy before they went in. To me, this suggests that there may have been a breach of health and safety regulations, either by Endemol, Channel 4 or another party involved - and I believe this needs to be investigated.

It's true that many professional people like to consider themselves morally or intellectually superior both to those who enjoy watching the show, and to those who take part in it. But that doesn't change the fact that the participants are real people. Saying "it could never happen to me" is no justification for not taking health and safety seriously.

Whether diseases occur on building sites, in factories, in hospitals, in kitchens or on low-brow trash TV shows makes no difference - either way, real people are at risk, and an investigation needs to be conducted to ensure that it doesn't happen again.

Joe says that the participants probably received full briefing beforehand - but that's no excuse either. If there was any concern that Jo, Jade, or anyone else might go crazy as a result of being on the show, either directly because of the show's activities, or indirectly due to the media fall-out, then they should never have been allowed on the show in the first place.

I think that if there were to be a whitewash of this incident - or worse still, no investigation at all - then it would create a nasty precedent for workplaces throughout the UK, not just those in the entertainment industry.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 04 February 2007 10:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter MacDonald
Freddie

You are a funny man. No, actually hilarious.

Peter
Admin  
#11 Posted : 04 February 2007 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holyterror72
Peter,

I second that.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 05 February 2007 09:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason911
Freddie

Maybe the first ever contestants in the B.B house would have a case. The show is well enough established now for all to know what it is all about. They knew that they would be on display, along with everything they had ever done before.

They knew the risks and yet they were so hungry for fame and attention and money they took them. Saying their H&S duty of care has been violated is like saying the same thing to an Formula driver who crashes!!

What astounds me is the snowball effect that this whole storm in a teacup was allowed to develop into my the media, its shameful and any media hack who jumped on the band wagon should be to embarrassed to call themselves a true journalist.

There were quite clearly other remarks made in the house by Mr Jackson for example, such as 'White trash' so can someone please tell me why that is not racist, as the media have clearly chosen to white wash over it?

Anyway I don't care, and as far as I am concerned you waive the sort of H&S rights we seem to be talking about here i.e mental health when you sign up to a reality TV show.

Jay

Admin  
#13 Posted : 05 February 2007 11:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alice
It is slightly more annoying that the whole point of Big Brother is to show people behaving normally and to explore what people are really like. Yet when people have been themselves and expressed what they really think...etc. they are griefed to the edge of suicide (with seemingly very little ongoing support from BB / C4 / Endemol) for doing so. I think the makers of BB should take at least some of the responsibility for ensuring ex-housemates remain sane. I can see why they want to be seen to disassociate themselves from the whole 'racism' thang, but it is they who could've prevented it from escalating to the extent that it has.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 05 February 2007 12:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Seeing as I am a total cynic and believe that the whole argument/issue was carefully scripted from the start to get the reaction it did perhaps C4 need investigation for wasting police time.

The words and reasons coming out from both sides mirrored those by C4 bosses in their attempts at justification so where did the words come from? It is mealy mouthed to call it a cultural clash - after all racism IS about cultural clashes. C4 just did not realise the depth of the reaction that was going to occur.

Bob
Admin  
#15 Posted : 05 February 2007 13:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
So BB don't tell the BBers what is going on then??? just remember that this is edited by C4 etc so that they get 'good copy' with their programme.

You only get to see what they want you to see and being nice to Shilpa was not on their radar!

George Orwell and all that!
Admin  
#16 Posted : 05 February 2007 15:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John P
Jay

Forget the content. It might be odious but it's not the point. The point is quite simple. Is it fair game to take someone's health for entertainment? In the earlier shows, pricking at raw nerves to annoy them and provoke a reaction was what it was all about. This was different. The comparison with a racing driver (to which volenti non fit injuria surely would apply) is not valid. This is like sending a racing driver off in a well maintained vehicle and then trying to shoot out his tyres.

John
Admin  
#17 Posted : 05 February 2007 15:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Joe Doc
John P et al,

I am willing to concede the potentially fudged issue over volenti etc, but in this case who owes the greater duty of care to whom?

Is it BB with their editorial power or the individual management agents of said celebrities who viewed same TV and heard of same outcries as everyone else but failed to advise clients of unfolding events and take necessary action, i.e remove or advise said clients to leave the show.

My guess is the latter did not choose to remove clients under the guise of ain't no such thing as bad PR (as was already stated by someone).
Admin  
#18 Posted : 05 February 2007 16:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John P
Hi Joe

Theatrical agents are not renowned for their high moral dudgeon. I suspect you are correct about their motives.

Feel the force Skywalker.

John
Admin  
#19 Posted : 05 February 2007 16:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason911
John,

I understand what you are saying about the formula one but surely the reason many watch that, or any other dangerous sport is the danger and the ultimate possibility that competitors could seriously get hurt, which makes it great viewing for some at least and H&S is put to one side.

What I am saying is its exactly the same in the BB house. Its essentially car crash or shock TV and everyone knows it. I mean any BB contestant who subsequently claims mental illness should be held accountable for failing to take reasonable care of their own H&S.


I also would also argue as I am sure the producers will, that most of the controversy that is created in the house is essentially no different from most everyday life situations, but for some reason we find the fact of them being shown on TV as simply outrageous.

Jay

Admin  
#20 Posted : 05 February 2007 17:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Longworth
Quite a few things amuse me about this thread. Firstly there's the "I never watch shows like this" brigade. Then there's the "I only watched it for research purposes" lot, all moralising about how "pond life" like Jade Goody et al deserve everything that they get.
"They knew the risks before they went in" is the universal cry.

How many of you also would say the same thing about workers in any other industry exposed to a particular hazard. How do we even know if the risks were explained to the contestants. If it can be foreseen that contestants in a reality TV show would be exposed to a particular risk then they are entitled to expect protection from that risk. To say anything less is hypocritical.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 05 February 2007 17:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason911
Peter,

They are told the risks prior to entry. Even if they were not, who in this country could claim not to know what B.B is all about, even if they had never seen it?

ITS A REALITY TV SHOW AND THEY ARE ALL ABOUT PUBLIC HUMILIATION FOR THE ENJOYMENT OF THE MASSES!!!!!

No Offense Peter, but surely your 'brigade' would argue that a solider in an army should never ever get shot at!!!

Jay

Admin  
#22 Posted : 05 February 2007 18:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor
It all sounds a bit consensual to me.

Perhaps we could get Anne Robinson banned for much the same reasons?
Admin  
#23 Posted : 05 February 2007 23:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Longworth
I don't remember joining any brigade except maybe the anti - hypocrisy brigade.
As for the armed forces I don't expect them not to be shot at but I do expect that they should be supplied with the best PPE available to protect them as much as possible when they are shot at.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 06 February 2007 09:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John P
I don't want this thread to go on forever but I do think it raises important issues. We have to be alert to new and evolving risks, even if they are only going to have an impact on very few people. In recent years we've seen people killed (Noel Edmonds TV show) and people suffer mental health issues resulting in the death of others (American TV show where gay bloke tells his mate he loves him and a few days later gay bloke is shot by his mate). I have to say I agree with Peter. We don't need to like those involved to care.
Admin  
#25 Posted : 06 February 2007 13:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Claire C
Big Brother is watching.

He has censored poor Alice's comments....

Big Brother strikes again!
Admin  
#26 Posted : 06 February 2007 13:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason911
I agree that we must adapt and progress H&S to constantly improve conditions and control the risks for the working masses, in an effort to reduce serious accidents arising from major issues like workplace transport.

I don't agree that we have to Analise everything to the point were you can no longer do anything because you may possibly get hurt.

B.B, be it a manufactured and massaged environment, is a simple mirror image of society with the only difference being that the contestants are in a goldfish bowl and watched by the media, all of which they are more than well aware of. What makes B.B so successful? The same thing as the gladiator fighting in the Colosseum, its called human nature.

Personally my priorities lie elsewhere and to those more at risk and worthy of our help than the contestants of a trivial show like B.B, which is no more than a game played by those willing to take the risk of public humiliation to achieve financial reward and either make then into, or renew their waining celebrity status.

That is their choice in an effort to satisfy their lust for money, fame and a privileged life and to avoid their perception of a mundane one.

It is also many peoples choice to watch them and make comparisons to their own life, as well as enjoy watching them stumble and fall because they love it.

Imagine a show with all the controls suggested, I mean what sort of a sterile environment would that be and how hypicritical of real life. Plus who would watch it you?

Jay

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.