Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 12 March 2007 15:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Zaphod I received a flyer through my front door the other day from a window cleaning company using this heading to encourage me (a potential customer) to ask them to clean my windows. (They use hose-fed pole systems rather than ladders). Is anyone aware of the case they are quoting and whether it is true that the householder would be liable - rather than the window cleaner.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 12 March 2007 16:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dean Stevens Zaphod See this link, might have some info that would help you. http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...iew&forum=1&thread=23879 Also try a forum search this has been discussed many times before. At the end of the day it just sounds like this window cleaner is just using scare tactics to gain new buisness. Good luck.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 12 March 2007 18:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Zaphod Not aware of the case and I would be very surprised if it true. Also, I don't believe a lay person could be prosecuted for an injury to a contractor. Statutory health and safety law only applies to commercial undertakings and not domestic work. How about this headline: 'Window cleaner fined by Advertising Standards Authority for misleading advert.' Ray
Admin  
#4 Posted : 12 March 2007 19:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT I would like to catch sight of the flyer detailing before commenting further; the responses thus far though are right, the domestic householder is unlikely to be prosecuted under UK H&S legislation but could be sued under civil law; for example, if they knowingly had a serious defect within the property that would be likely to cause injury and did not advise the window cleaner. CFT
Admin  
#5 Posted : 12 March 2007 19:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese In the back of my mind there is case where a person set fire to their loft and was either prosecuted or (more probably) sued for an injury caused to a firefighter.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 13 March 2007 07:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jom Peter said: "In the back of my mind there is case where a person set fire to their loft and was either prosecuted or (more probably) sued for an injury caused to a firefighter" A gas plant had a fire. The fire brigade came to quell the fire. The company was found guilty of the criminal charge of endangering members of the public in the form of the firefighters. John.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 13 March 2007 08:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lee Mac I am not aware of any such case but yes it could quite well be true. If you employ the services of a contractor to carry out any service on your property, you can be held liable if they suffer an injury on your property. FYI if someone breaks into your home and they sprain an ankle during the trespass they have the right to lay a claim against your insurance, however, the judge hopefully would have a bit more clout than to award damages. Regards, Lee
Admin  
#8 Posted : 13 March 2007 12:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese I think it was a householder John, not a company.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 13 March 2007 12:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese Hi Lee, "FYI if someone breaks into your home and they sprain an ankle during the trespass they have the right to lay a claim against your insurance, however, the judge hopefully would have a bit more clout than to award damages." Do you have so reference for that one I could look up, where damages have been awarded to a burglar in domestic premises? Might be a good living to be had.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 13 March 2007 12:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch The burglar shot and injured by Tony Martin in Norfolk, I think?
Admin  
#11 Posted : 13 March 2007 12:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tez Is this an April fool-bit early i think. Maybe the flyer said the homeowner was fine when the person fell off the ladder? What a load of twoodle, bish bosh bash. If there is a flyer stating that, then i think Trading Standards may have a view. No such penalty exsists-yes as mentioned above would only be a civil matter-most certainly not criminal-no way hosay. Anyway back to work as a errrr regulator
Admin  
#12 Posted : 13 March 2007 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lee Mac Hi Peter, No sources come to mind where a case was actually won in this instance in the UK, although I am sure if you trawl through US cases there may be one. One where damages was sought was in a recent case in the ROI, which was very simialr to the Tony Martin case although I am not exactly sure of the outcome- check out the Irish Independent Newspaper's website- if you fancy delving. If you note in my statement I still give hope for our judges to rule with a degree of common sense. The fact remains though burgulars still have the right to claim even if they were breaking the law in the first instance. Just ask your insurers. Regards, Lee
Admin  
#13 Posted : 13 March 2007 13:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Zaphod It's good to debate whether there is a load of old twaddle or not. However, I want to get to some hard facts. I work in a charity that supports people with learning disabilities - some in care homes, some in their own homes, some in housing association owned homes etc etc, so this is very relevant when trying to devise management systems for checking contractors. For example, if we have a window cleaner on site who does not have public liability insurance, do we through him off site because we could be liable if a falls off his ladder. Our external accreditors and insurers have suggested this might be the case but I am really not certain. If anyone can provide some clarity/ case law this would be very helpful. Many thanks and keep the replies coming in!
Admin  
#14 Posted : 13 March 2007 13:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy Hi All just a few thoughts.... re burglars and intruders etc. You are allowed to use "reasonable force", I don't think, in Tony Martins case, that sitting in wait armed with a shotgun, then unleasing both barrels constitutes reasonable force. However, I do sympathise with him. How often do window cleaners report for duty and announce that they are on your premises. Not very often i imagine. So, as a private homeowner, with no legal duty of care re h+s, if you don't know they are there, how can you take reasonable care to inform them of all the risks. Perhaps a "post it" note on a drain pipe? All irrelevant realy. I dont beleive that any private homeowner would be held liable for a window cleaner falling from his ladder, providing of course the house holder hadnt set any traps for him. Just my thoughts....shoot me down if you want!!
Admin  
#15 Posted : 13 March 2007 13:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese Try http://www.swarb.co.uk/lisc/Neglg19851989.php Ogwo v Taylor 1987.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 13 April 2007 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By mike morland You cannot expect the general public / private house owner / tenant to know that the window cleaner fell because he had not placed his ladder at the correct angle, lashed it at the top or employed a second person to 'foot' the ladder, inspected the ladder on a regular basis and attached relevant signage or placed it on a slippery slope and over reached etc. etc. Nor can the same window cleaner claim for Repetative Strain Injury after years of wringing out his wash leather because he didn't use a squeegee!
Admin  
#17 Posted : 13 April 2007 16:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Diane Thomason Note that Zaphod is referring to someone allegedly being fined, not civil liability. The Ogwo v Taylor case quoted above was a civil claim. It would be great to contact this cleaning company asking politely for details of the £17k fine case - and indeed Trading Standards might be interested if there turns out to be no such case.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 16 April 2007 13:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackw. Hi, this assertion has been on here in previous posts. To the best of my recollection no one came up with any concrete evidence, case reference etc. Personally i think it is a load of tosh,but would be happy to be proven wrong by evidence. Cheers.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 17 April 2007 12:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tez Said it before and i will say it again. I agree-tosh- No Health & Safety Criminal Duty owed. The householder does not come under the HASAWEA 74 Act End of
Admin  
#20 Posted : 17 April 2007 15:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lee Mac Although this particular case may not be 100% accurate, I am 100% certain that you can be held liable if someone injures themselves whilst on your property no matter what the reason. I have had this confirmed by both our insurers and legals. If in doubt speak to your insurers/legals. Regards, Lee
Admin  
#21 Posted : 17 April 2007 15:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gff surely you can only be sued due to negligence and or breach of duty of care. otherwise i off to the neighbours pond to fall in a break my leg. Their fish are a damn nuisance IE 1. you owed a duty of care 2. where there was a duty of care that such duty was breached 3. the breach of that duty of care caused a loss
Admin  
#22 Posted : 17 April 2007 16:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lee Mac It is as simple as this, if you own property and a personal claim is laid against you- you are then to show how you had taken reasonable steps to prevent any injury being realised. This will not stop any payment, it may only reduce the amount unless someone is captured deliberately injuring themselves. I totally agree it is pure madness and is only going to give rise to more and more claims once it becomes common knowledge that the possibility exists for such claims. But until this legal situation is sorted out it will only give rise to a worsening claim situation. Lee
Admin  
#23 Posted : 11 June 2007 14:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Wayne Voller Sorry for arriving at this debate a bit late. I am the Safety Director of the window cleaners trade association, and I would be most interested to hear where this window cleaner was from. I would hazard a guess at somewhere on the Berks, Hants border. In my opinion, and it is only that, a householder is unlikely to be held liable for injury to a window cleaner working on his property. A private individual in this situation it is my belief, has no liability under statute law. However, all people owe a duty of care to one another, under civil law. But is a duty owed? I dont think so, although there are situations where perhaps a degree of culpability could be claimed, where perhaps the window being asked to be cleaned gives way because it is not maintained in good condition. However you specifically mentioned the householder being 'fined', well you're not fined under civil law, but are made to pay compensation. I'm afraid despite the best efforts of professional associations, some rogue, dare i say 'cowboys', have been known to use this veiled threat to 'steal' work away from competitors. Best to use a window cleaner belonging to a professional association, who can be taken to task over such rash claims. PS. I imagine that your house insurers, which generally over third party accidents, would make a good case of throwing such a claim out of court
Admin  
#24 Posted : 11 June 2007 14:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Wayne I think you find the case (I use that term loosley) referred to has been confused with another, which was a commercial incident. I can't recall the case exactly but the £17K fine does strike a chord. As you rightly point out, only criminal cases will lead to a prosecution and fine under h&s law. Compensation under a civil claim for a failure of duty of care is very unlikely for domestic work of this kind, as no doubt the defence would come under the ambit of 'volenti'. Ray
Admin  
#25 Posted : 13 June 2007 12:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By paul spear PAS SCAFFOLDING HAS BEEN TRADING FOR NEARLY TEN YEARS AND SURVIVED THROUGH SHEAR HARD WORK, ____________________________________________ The question you ask" window cleaners!!!!!ladders" you should not be looking for legal notes or case studies you should be looking at the job you have asked them to do" being? you?the person instructing or asking them to do" Law is as complex as you make it!!!!!! if your not happy or comfortable with what you see then say stop!! I HAVE ATTACHED SOME NOTES FOR YOU TO PONDER AT YOUR LESURE. Be the first person to ask a window cleaner for a method statement and and the rest. INOVATION AND A LOT OF HELP FROMS our CLIENTS. NOW IT’S TIME TO CHANGE AUTHORISED PERSON – MAIN CONTRACTOR- SITE NAME- DATE01/06/07 SAFE SYSTEMS OF WORK VERSION 1.2 NEW RULES LEGSLATION CHANGES PAS SCAFFOLDING CODE OF CONDUCT AND SAFE SYSTEMS ISSUE DATE VERSION 1.2 ALL OBJECTIVE VIEWS ARE INTRINSIC TO OUR PROGRESION. YOU MATTER? WE WANT YOUR OPINIONS We are not all the same, allow for correction.? We are all the same no room for correction.? No correction necessary?. SETTING STANDARDS WE CAN KEEP. K.I.S ACRONYM “KEEP IT SIMPLE” PERSONAL LAWS THAT THE PAS SCAFFOLD TEAM WILL AIM FOR , FROM THE MANAGEMENT THROUGH TO THE NEW APPRENTACES. LAW 1 BY MY ACTIONS OR INACTION I WILL NOT ALLOW HARM OR POTENCIALY HARM TO ANY OTHER! LAW 2 BY MY ACTIONS OR INACTIONS IWILL NOT ALLOW MY SELF TO BE HARMED OR POTENCIALY HARMED! LAW 3 RESPECT OTHERS AND BY MY ACTIONS GAIN RESPECT FROM OTHERS! Short term: Understanding Why? Scaffolding is a qualitative industry. “Artistic discipline” Each individual scaffolder through there professional and life experiences will approach the erection of scaffolds differently. With all artistic disciplines there is individual interpretation. Scaffold training is practical based, while this has been acceptable for the past 34 years ”scaffolding was made a skilled profession in 1971” the social and industrial needs and values have or are changing. Slowly change the scaffolder’s boundaries? The Access industry is a Quallative discipline? The Access industry is a Quantative discipline? We are not all the same, allow for correction. We are all the same no room for correction. No correction necessary. Definition of a ticket/ Scaff tag sheet and inspection. A ticket / scafftag are an erection and an inspection record placed on a prominent position preferably near the point of access on scaffolds erected. The pas scaffold team leader will place a completed scafftag/ticket on every completed scaffold structure. The pas scaffold team leader will then issue a handover certificate to the client and or clients authorized person. The pas scaffold team leader will then enter the ticket /tag number and details in the maintenance and inspection record kept on site. The pas scaffold team leader will then inspect the scaffold for defect or misuse every seven days and or when the client requests an additional inspection. In the event of alteration, misuse or removal of any part or parts of the scaffold the client/main contractor will Take full responsibility for the maintenance and inspection of the scaffold erected on site. All alterations, reinstating and or maintenance will be carried out as soon as is reasonable possible and the client will be liable until the scaffold or parts of the scaffold are reinstated by a competent person. The scafftag/ ticket will not be replaced on unsafe scaffolds until all actions have been taken to rectify the scaffold and controls put in place to stop reoccurrence. Once the scaffold has been off hired in righting or verbally by trusted clients The scafftag/ticket will be removed and a do not use sign will replace the ticket. Regulation 29 of the construction (Health safety and welfare)Regulation 1996 Regulation 29 of the construction (Health safety and welfare)Regulation 1996 Schedule 8 A written report of inspection must be carried out within the working day of the inspection. Schedule 8 A copy of the written report must be logged in the Pas scaffold office within 24hrs. Ticket sheet Step 1 The Client Client criteria Safety ethos. ? The client will have safe working practices and ethos. ? The client will have a safe well managed site free from harm. ? The client will access and control all risks to Pas scaffold employees. ? The client will accept and respect Pas scaffolds Safe systems and task protocol. ? The client will not expect Pas scaffolding operatives to take uncontrolled risks. ? The client will Report any issues back to pas scaffold management. ? The client will respect all regulations and set out in civil and statute law. Financial ethos. ? The client will be financially capable of managing accessed risks. ? The client will be financially capable of payment as set out on invoices. ? The client will respect dates and deadlines set out on Pas scaffold documents. ? The client will not exceed limits set on Pas scaffold documentation. Personal interaction. ? The client will interact with Pas Operatives clearly, politely and positively. ? The client will Accept and log all paperwork issued by Pas scaffold. ? The client will Respect objective views and values. ? The client will accept and respect Pas scaffolds Safe systems and task protocol. We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? Ticket sheet Step 2 The site Site criteria Safety ethos. ? The site will have safe working practices and ethos. ? The site will have a safe well managed place of work free from harm. ? The site will access and control all risks to Pas scaffold employees. ? The site will accept and respect Pas scaffolds Safe systems and task protocol. ? The site will Report any issues back to pas scaffold management. ? The site will respect all regulations and set out in civil and statute law. ? The site will be financially capable of managing accessed risks. ? The site will respect dates and deadlines set out on Pas scaffold documents. ? The Site will not exceed limits set on Pas scaffold documentation. Personal interaction. ? The client’s site representative will interact with Pas Operatives clearly, politely and positively. ? The clients site representative will Accept and log all paperwork issued by Pas scaffold. ? The clients site representative will Respect objective views and values. ? The client’s site representative will accept and respect Pas scaffolds Safe systems and task protocol. We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? Ticket sheet Step 3 The team leader “High 5” The team leader criteria ? Competent and comfortable with working at heights. ? The Ability to work safely day in day out. ? Minimum part 2 cis “citb” scaffolder, plus 5 years experience. ? Full UK driving license. ? Motivated to progress professionally. ? Motivated to progress educationally. ? Able to be challenged on there views and experiences. ? Respect others views and values ? Represent pas Scaffolding with a professional aptitude and manor. ? Take and carryout clear verbal or written instruction. ? Give clear verbal or written instruction. ? Transfer all information to and from PAS base office and site. ? IT literate ? Use safely and professionally all equipment provided. ? Respect all equipment provided to carryout there daily duties. ? No there personal and professional limits and not exceed those limits ? Understand Pas Scaffold Systems. ? Reliable. ? Work well in a team environment. ? Will wear any PPE which has been accessed necessary by either client representative or PAS Scaffolding management We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? Ticket sheet Step 4 aiming team leader “Aiming High 5” The Aiming team leader “Aiming High 5” criteria ? Competent and comfortable with working at heights. ? The Ability to work safely day in day out. ? Full UK driving license. ? Motivated to progress professionally. ? Motivated to progress educationally. ? Able to be challenged on there views and experiences. ? Respect others views and values ? Represent pas Scaffolding with a professional aptitude and manor. ? Take and carryout clear verbal or written instruction. ? Give clear verbal or written instruction. ? Transfer all information to and from PAS base office and site. ? IT literate ? Use safely and professionally all equipment provided. ? Respect all equipment provided to carryout there daily duties. ? No there personal and professional limits and not exceed those limits ? Understand Pas Scaffold Systems. ? Reliable. ? Work well in a team environment. ? Will wear any PPE which has been accessed necessary by either client representative or PAS Scaffolding management ? We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? Ticket sheet Step 5 Authorised by “client’s representative Definition of a authorised person. A person chosen to represent a client. A person chosen to carry out the clients instruction. A person chosen to implement and monitor safe system implemented. A person chosen to enforce safe systems local to there duties and area. A person chosen to implement programs set out. A person chosen to implement a good safety ethos. “As below” A person chosen to implement a good financial ethos. “As below” A person chosen to interact with individuals on site. ”As below” Safety ethos. The Authorised person will have safe working practices and ethos. ? The Authorised person will have a safe well managed site free from harm. ? The Authorised person will access and control all risks to Pas scaffold employees. ? The Authorised person will accept and respect Pas scaffolds Safe systems and task protocol. ? The Authorised person will not expect Pas scaffolding operatives to take uncontrolled risks. ? The Authorised person will Report any issues back to pas scaffold management. ? The Authorised person will respect all regulations set out in civil and statute law. Financial ethos. The Authorised person will be capable of managing accessed risks. ? The Authorised person will be capable of payment as set out on invoices. ? The Authorised person will respect dates and deadlines set out on Pas scaffold documents. ? The Authorised person will not exceed limits set on Pas scaffold documentation. Personal interaction. ? The Authorised person will interact with Pas Operatives clearly, politely and positively. ? The Authorised person will Accept and log all paperwork issued by Pas scaffold. ? Respect objective views and values. Ticket sheet Step 6 the invoice number Invoice number criteria. Pas scaffold and clients information. ? Date of work carried out. ? Date of invoice. ? The name and address of Pas scaffold. ? Pas scaffolds logo. ? The name and address of the client. ? The name and address of the site where work has been carried out. ? The person who authorised the work. ? A brief description of work carried out. ? Pas scaffolds credit terms. ? Pas scaffolds telephone numbers, fax number, web site , email address. Scaffold information on invoice. ? If the amount invoiced is contract. ? If the amount invoiced is extra to contract. ? If the amount invoiced is for scaffold erection. ? If the amount invoiced is for hire of scaffolds erected. ? Scaffold state, if incomplete. ? If the scaffold is incomplete the percentage that is complete. ? Is the amount for work carried out for maintenance and or alteration? ? Order information on invoice ? Pas scaffold ticket number. ? The clients order number. ? The client’s representatives name. ? Evidence of order. “Clients written order” ? Vat number. Financials information on invoice. ? Sub total amount. ? Total amount due. ? Vat total amount Ticket sheet Step 7 The scaffold Structure. Scaffold criteria. Scaffold structure to be used for , set out by scafftag Definition of light duty scaffold ;150 kg per square meter per platform Definition of General purpose scaffold ;200kg per square meter per platform Definition of heavy duty scaffold ;250 kg per square meter per platform Engineer drawings needed Definition of special purpose scaffold ;Additional expertise and knowledge needed. User type will replace scaffold structure. General construction use brick work , roof work, Form work, Timber work, Ground work, Inspection/investigation Other General Engineering use Mechanical work, Insulation work , Electrical work, Instrument work. Welding. Inspection/investigation Other General Demolition use High risk, stop and call manager immediately other We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? Ticket sheet Step 8 The Scaffold information and site area Scaffold information and site area , Criteria. Scaffold information and site area ? Remember Name of building ? Remember Name of room ? Remember Height from ground level ? Remember Key reference “near fire exit, near tank ect “ ? Remember Any additional or relevant information needed ? Remember you are justifying what you have erected. ? Remember you are justifying why you have erected the scaffold. ? Remember you are justifying where you have erected scaffold. Special information you feel that should be recorded. ? Scaffold information and site area can also be used to ? Convey any difficulties encountered. ? Any scaffold materials cut or damaged. ? Any damage to third parties. ”non pas scaffold articles or objects” ? Please feel free to use this space for any other issue. ? Any specials over and above your usual duties. We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? Ticket sheet Step 9 The Scaffold types Scaffold type criteria. Handrail definition. Handrails are a Physical temporary barrier erected to stop or reduce the risk of? ? Handrail will stop or reduce the risk of Person falling from heights. ? Handrail with toe board will reduce or stop the risk of a person and or objects falling from heights Handrail spacing. We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? Ticket sheet Step 10 The Scaffold types birdcage Scaffold type criteria. Birdcage definition. Birdcage scaffold is a scaffold erected to provide access to large volume areas? A birdcage can be many elevations and have different size bays depending on final use and scaffold user type. Other terms for birdcage are as below. ? Crash deck ? Pigeon coat Sample Team leader who erected the above scaffold is; £100 bonus is given to the individual who erected the above scaffold. Ticket sheet Step 11 The Scaffold type Suspended scaffold. Scaffold type criteria. Suspended scaffold definition. Suspended scaffold is a scaffold erected when it is not reasonable or practicable to erect any other scaffold access platforms. Suspended scaffolds are a higher risk than standard scaffolds to erect and dismantle and should be a final choice to other access types. Other terms for suspended scaffolds are as below. ? Hanger ? Dropper Sample Team leader who erected the above scaffold is; £100 bonus is given to the individual who erected the above scaffold. Ticket sheet Step 12 The Scaffold type tower scaffold. Scaffold type criteria. Tower scaffold definition. Tower scaffold is a scaffold erected to form access or other to small volume areas Tower scaffolds can have multiple elevations and contain 4 number standards only. Other terms for tower scaffolds are as below. ? Access tower ? Platform scaffold A quality scaffold erected by Pas scaffolding. Traditional values New ideals Modern technology “Layher system scaffold” Team leader who erected the above scaffold is; L Collins £100 bonus is given to the individual who erected the above scaffold. Ticket sheet Step 13 The Scaffold type staircase scaffold. Scaffold type criteria. Staircase scaffold definition. Staircase scaffold is a scaffold erected to improve access and egress where it is accessed that ladder are not reasonable practicable to use. Other terms for tower scaffolds are as below. ? System staircase ? Mobile staircase Sample Team leader who erected the above scaffold is; £100 bonus is given to the individual who erected the above scaffold. Ticket sheet Step 14 the Scaffold type alloy tower scaffold. Scaffold type criteria. Alloy tower scaffold definition. Alloy tower scaffold is a multi platform scaffold widely used as a cost affective option to traditional scaffold. Alloy tower scaffold is usually system based in self interlocking. Other terms for tower scaffolds are as below. ? Quick fit ? Mobile tower Sample Team leader who erected the above scaffold is; £100 bonus is given to the individual who erected the above scaffold. Ticket sheet Step 15 the Scaffold type canter lever scaffold. Scaffold type criteria. Canter lever scaffold definition. Canter lever scaffold is platform from a fixed point i.e. other scaffold and is a substitute to additional platforms where it is not reasonable practicable to erect from fixed ground level. Other terms for tower scaffolds are as below. ? Truss out ? Fan Sample Team leader who erected the above scaffold is; £100 bonus is given to the individual who erected the above scaffold. Ticket sheet Step 16 the Scaffold type Mat scaffold. Scaffold type criteria. Mat scaffold definition. Mat scaffold is platform. Utilizing fixed objects “i.e. Steel girders and or beams” to act ass load dispersal points or erected over small voids or holes. Other terms for tower scaffolds are as below. ? Lay down ? Blanket scaffolds Sample Team leader who erected the above scaffold is; £100 bonus is given to the individual who erected the above scaffold. Ticket sheet Step 17 The Scaffold type independent scaffold. Scaffold type criteria. Independent scaffold definition. Independent scaffold can be a maximum of 2 meters wide “between standards” multiple elevations and as long as is reasonable practicable. Other terms for tower scaffolds are as below. ? Brick layer scaffold ? Standard scaffold Sample Team leader who erected the above scaffold is; £100 bonus is given to the individual who erected the above scaffold. Ticket sheet Step 16 The Scaffold type Mat scaffold. Scaffold type criteria. Special scaffold definition. Mat scaffold is platform utilizing fixed objects “i.e. Steel girders and or beams” to act ass load dispersal points or erected over small voids or holes. Other terms for tower scaffolds are as below. ? Lay down ? Blanket scaffolds Sample Team leader who erected the above scaffold is; £100 bonus is given to the individual who erected the above scaffold. Quote The right way. Pas scaffold and clients information. ? Date of Quote ? The name and address of Pas scaffold. ? Pas scaffolds logo. ? The name and address of the client. ? The name and address of the site where work has been carried out. ? The person who authorised the work. ? A brief description of work carried out. ? Pas scaffolds credit terms. ? Pas scaffolds telephone numbers, fax number, web site, email address. Scaffold information on Quote. ? Is the quote contract. ? Is the quote extra to contract? ? Is the quote for scaffold erection? ? Is the quote for hire of scaffolds erected? ? Scaffold state, if incomplete. ? Is the quote for maintenance and or alteration? Order information on Quote. ? Pas scaffold ticket number. ? The client’s representatives name. ? Vat number. Financials information on invoice. ? Sub total amount. ? Total amount due. ? Vat total amount ? Due grand total. We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? Team leader’s duties. Team leaders will set an example by. ? Wearing all PPe issued. ? Erect all scaffolds to the best of there ability ? Dismantle all scaffolds to the best of there ability ? Represent pas scaffold to the best of there ability ? Interact with the client on site professionally ? Place tag on scaffold after erection ? Hand scaffolds erected over to client “by giving the client a hand over agreement ? Manage there team mate to the best of there ability ? Relay all information from site to Pas scaffolds office ? Relay all information from Pas scaffolds office to site ? Make sure that all new scaffolds have a ticket or scafftag in places. ? Being reliable and trust worthy. ? Acting safe. ? Working safe ? Thinking safe ? No there limits Represent Pas scaffold in all areas! Professionally We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? New technologies Pas scaffold has and is developing a purpose built software system witch fixes certain boundaries. These boundaries are set into three categories listed below. Legislation Regulation set up under statute law which is defined by red text on this and these documents. Health and safety at Work Act 1974 The construction (lifting Operations) Regulations 1961 The Management of Health and safety at work Regulations 1992 The Provision and use of Work Equipment Regulations 1992 The Construction (Health, Safety and welfare) Regulations 1996 Codes of conduct Codes of conduct Set up by access industry professional bodies which is defined by amber text on this and these documents. Codes of conduct information taken from as below CITB “construction industry training board” BS 1129 Specification for portable timber ladders, steps, trestles and lightweight staging BS 1139 Metal scaffolding BS 2482 Specification for timber scaffold boards BS 5973 Code of Practice for access and working scaffolds and special scaffold structures in steal. BS 5974 Code of practice for temporarily installed suspended scaffolds and access equipment. BS 5975 Code of practice for false work. Other references National association of scaffolding.SG4 Contractors technical guidance note TG5:91 CITB: a guide to practical scaffolding Ian st johns Nebosh Managing safely. Evidence Evidential and informational text will be set out in black. Analogies and prose will be set out in green text. Unsafe acts. What unsafe act means and who it applies to is set out in the numbered bullet points below? 1) Pas scaffolding employees. 2) Pas scaffolding sub contractors. 3) Pas scaffoldings Clients. 4) Pas scaffoldings clients authorised person. Gross misconduct definition An unsafe act that has or the potential to cause serious injury harm or damage to person’s plant or machinery. Gross misconduct has the penalty of instant dismissal or refusal to quote for. Misconduct definition An unsafe act that has or the potential to Cause injury, harm or damage to persons plant or machinery. Misconduct has the penalty of instant dismissal or serious reprimand or refusal to quote for. Breach of pas scaffolds code of conduct. Misuse, abuse or failure to carry out instruction or behave to the best of there ability and or leave, erect or dismantle a scaffold in an unsafe manor. 3 written warning indicates an inability to work or act safely 3 written warning will have the penalty of dismissal or refusal to quote for. Safe acts. Pas scaffolding would rather reward professional and positive behaviour than discipline unsafe or unreasonable behaviour. Pas scaffolding is committed to professional and positive employees. Pas scaffolding is committed to professional and positive sub contractors. Pas scaffolding is committed to professional and positive clients. Pas scaffolding is committed to professional and positive client’s representatives. We are not all the same, allow for correction. We are all the same no room for correction. No correction necessary. The below will be worn at all times: - Safety Boots Safety Helmet Safety Overalls Safety Harness We will also implement any procedures set out in the site safe systems of work. We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? Pas scaffold Construction of scaffolds All scaffolds and working platforms should be properly constructed to provide adequate working space and comply with the construction (health, safety and welfare) Regulations 1996 and, where appropriate, The construction (Lifting Operations) Regulations 1961. No scaffold may be erected, modified or dismantled, except under the supervision of an experienced and competent person, and all structures should be inspected by the competent person before use. Competent person There is no legal definition of this term in the Construction Regulations, but elsewhere it is accepted as: A person who has practical and theoretical knowledge together with actual experience of what they are to examine, so as to enable them to detect errors, Defects, faults or weaknesses which it is the purpose of the examination or inspection to discover; and to assess the importance of any such discovery. Legislation Health and safety at Work Act 1974 The construction (lifting Operations) Regulations 1961 The Management of Health and safety at work Regulations 1992 The Provision and use of Work Equipment Regulations 1992 The Construction (Health, Safety and welfare) Regulations 1996 References HSE publications Construction Information Sheet 10 Tower scaffolds British Standards BS 1129 Specification for portable timber ladders, steps, trestles and lightweight staging BS 1139 Metal scaffolding BS 2482 Specification for timber scaffold boards BS 5973 Code of Practice for access and working scaffolds and special scaffold structures in steal. BS 5974 Code of practice for temporarily installed suspended scaffolds and access equipment. BS 5975 Code of practice for false work. Other references National association of scaffolding Contractors technical guidance note TG2005 CITB: a guide to practical scaffolding Preparation and planning Your attention is drawn to the provisions of the management of health and safety at work regulations 1992 and the manual handling operations regulations 1992, particularly in relation to risk assessments. The management of health and safety at work regulations 1992. These place a requirement on every employer to make a suitable and sufficient assessment of every work activity, to detect and define any hazard to employees which might be encountered during there work or to any other person who might be effected by there operations. Once those hazards identified, it is then the employer’s duty to put control measures into place, to remove or reduce those hazards as far as is reasonably practicable. Where a hazard is identified that requires it, the employer must offer health surveillance to employees, which must be appropriate, taking into account the risks to their health and safety that have been identified . The employer must provide employees with comprehensible and relevant information on any risks that exits in the work place and of any control measures that are in place to reduce those risks. The employee, intern, has a duty under these regulations to tell the employer of any work situation which presents a risk to themselves or there work mates, or of any matter which affects the health and safety of themselves or there work mates: The manual handling operations regulations 1992 Each employer must, as far practicable avoid the need for employees to carry out any manual handling operations. Where this is not possible, the employer must make an assessment of the work to be carried out and take appropriate steps to reduce the risk of injury to any employees. All employees must use the safe system of work that have been put into place by there employer. Both sets of regulations require that, additionally the employer provides employees with adequate information, instruction and training to be able to carry out any work task to the best of there ability and in complete safety. (for further information see construction site safety, module 2, General Safety Legislation) Basic Scaffolding components Before the erection of any scaffold the following points must be clearly defined: • What is the scaffold for? • Exactly where is it to be erected? • What materials are to be used? • Can safe access be provided for the erection and use of the scaffold? • How many working platforms will there be? • What loadings will be imposed upon those working platforms, and on the scaffold as a whole? • Is the ground condition where the scaffold is to be erected suitable? • How and where can the scaffold be tied in? • What bracing will be required? We are not all the same, allow for correction? We are all the same no room for correction? No correction necessary? General conditions and provisions The construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996 repealed the remaining sections of the Construction (General Provisions) Regulations 1961, the whole of the Construction (working places) Regulations 1966 and The Construction (health and welfare) regulations 1996. Notwithstanding this, the health and safety at work act 1974 and the management of health and safety at work regulations 1992 require that a safe place and method of his work is provided and maintained and that risk assessments are carried out in respect of each and every action Whilst the construction (health, safety and welfare) regulations are not as prescriptive as the 1996 Regulations, the following points, with regards to the safe use of scaffolds, still apply. • A safe place of work, with safe access and egress, must be provided and properly maintained Reference The Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996, Regulation 6 • Scaffolding must only be erected, altered and dismantled under the supervision of a competent person and then only by people with adequate experience Reference The Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996, Regulation 6(8) • Scaffolding must be constructed of sound, strong material. Tubes should not be split, cracked, rusty, bent or distorted, and the timber used for boarding must be of the right type Reference BS 5973, Paragraph 6.2 • A scaffold should be properly maintained inspected frequently, to check that all parts are serviceable and properly secured to prevent accidental displacement Reference The Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996, Schedule 2 • No scaffold shall be left partly erected or dismantled unless adequate notices are displayed and unless blocked Materials • Tubes and fittings must comply with BS 1139 Part 1. Ends should be cut square and clean, free from, any bends or distortion, corrosion, lamination splits or surface flaws • Fittings should be free from...
Admin  
#26 Posted : 14 June 2007 09:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman I'm going to buy myself a ladder, a bucket and a wash rag. £17K a go beats consulting for a living. Merv
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.