Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 March 2007 15:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By kevin Connolly Hi All, I'm currently reviewing our Fire risk assessment and as part of this have to take into account that we now frequently have disabled visitors to our office for meetings. We do not currently provide evac chairs and in the event of a fire wheelchair users (or those unable to evacuate independently would be escorted to designated fire lobbies to await the rescue services. The debate I’m currently having revolves around is this acceptable or should we move to providing evac chairs? This in itself asks further questions on how many chairs, how many staff would need to be trained, what obligations these trained people have in the event of a fire etc. I've already spoken to a couple of wheelchair users who do not like the idea of evac chairs one commenting you would never get me in one of those things! Any experiences on providing or not providing would be greatly appreciated.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 March 2007 15:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Kevin, I haven't read the guidance on FRA for office and commercial premises, but the guides for care and healthcare state quite clearly that evacuation plans must be based on no assistance from the fire service; in other words, fire-fighters will rescue but not assist in evacuation. If this is generally the case the use of refuges as you describe would be unacceptable. We have just bought a number of evac chairs for one of our care centres; a service for people with complex neurological disability. Staff will use them whether service users like it or not; we do believe in choice and consent but happen to think we have no choice ourselves as far as the new RR(FS)O is concerned, John
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 March 2007 15:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Haynes The problem with the chairs is training the operators. I understand that the operator can need a certain amount of physical strength to control one of these chairs whilst going downstairs. Also - keeping the training up to date - cover for holidays/sickness etc. There does not appear to be a general consensus on this mode of evacuation, from discussion I had some time ago, there were as many 'For' as 'Against' their use. I suggest you investigate thoroughly before committing to purchasing them.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 March 2007 15:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FJ We do provide them as, under our fire risk assessment, we identified that there may be need of them for people using our training rooms. How else will you ensure that everyone gets out? The previous respondant is quite correct in saying that you have to plan for getting everyone out of the building without assuming that the fire/rescue authority will do it for you.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 March 2007 15:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer Leave them alone, that's the view of the London Fire Service. If you have a designated fire protection zone for those with disabilities and the fire service are aware of its location they will be satisfied that you have done all you can when taking into account the additional training needed for those who operate the evac chair and the additional risk of injury involved. Make sure you have adequate fire protection in these designated areas and let the professionals deal with the evacuation. That's LFB view.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 March 2007 16:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Bob, Is that a current view? I ask because every fire service I've spoken to recently has been of the opinion that evacuation is the responsibility of the controller of the premises, and not the fire service; which is also the view of the government guidance. Admittedly I haven't spoken to the LFB, John
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 March 2007 19:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever Bob That is not London Fire Brigade's view. I am an ex enforcing officer with London Fire Brigade. Neither is it the view of any other Fire Authority in the UK. If you ask LFB they will provide you with their guidance note on the evacuation of disabled occupants. I believe it is guidance note No.66. The view expressed by John Knight is essentially correct.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 20 March 2007 21:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phillip Fire reform order guidance is quite clear – disabled people should be able to evacuate a building without having to wait for the fire service. Remember also the Disability discrimination act has an anticipatory clause. So you need to make reasonable allowance for any credible foreseeable occupants. Why not give the disability commission a ring? You can easily google their help line. Don’t forget the blind & deaf.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 21 March 2007 00:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor There has been a lot of previous discussion on this subject on the Forum - so you could consult the archive to see the various opinions. Evacuation chairs can be of use in evacuation plans but there are problems and disadvantages. Other means of assisting non-ambulant persons to evacuate should also be considered along the lines of the BS and published guidance rather than simply buying evacuation chairs. Your fire plan must provide for the eventual evacuation of all occupants without relying upon the fire and rescue service. You have to look after the planned evacuation - they will attempt the rescue of any persons trapped in a building fire. Individual visiting firefighters have been known to say something along the lines of that attributed to the London Fire & Rescue Service in an earlier post - but this is not in accordance with the legislation or the official view of the FRS and, if a disabled person dies in a fire due to there not being provision to assist their evacuation, it will be down to the duty-holder and not the FRS.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 21 March 2007 09:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Shaun, thanks for the response; sometimes I think 'is it just me?', John
Admin  
#11 Posted : 21 March 2007 09:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer Hi all, The reason I said that LFB had given me a view that evac chairs are not really that good an idea is based upon the view of a fire officer who knows the building we occupy (next to a fire station) and that he understood the problems re training etc and his view is the building has good fire protection for disabled people and could be managed better by the fire service. I agreed with his view that the problems caused for employers far outweigh the advantages when professionally trained fire fighters will make a juddgement as to the need to evacuate disabled people against the amount of actual fire fighting needed to control the situation. If the official line of LFB is to require evac chairs it's not the view of operational officers.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 21 March 2007 09:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phillipe Bob I disagree, I have dealt with LFB Enforcement Officers and their veiw is contrary to the one you have offered. Perhaps you have an isolated case. As for the rest of the country, it is increasingly the same answer from all Fire Authorities, why do you think major retailers and other companies and shelling out thousands of pounds on evac chairs? We are being left with no option on the subject.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 21 March 2007 10:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Meiklejohn Hi All I have heard of lifts being used to evac disabled people in emergency situations - and not just fire/rescue lifts. I used to work on the fifth floor and the building owner had evac chairs however it was impossible to operate them because of the size and shape of the stairwells. I know it's policy with some companies in emergencies for a fire warden to commandeer the lift for disabled paople Not ideal.. Any thoughts
Admin  
#14 Posted : 21 March 2007 10:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Lawrence I have already experience this and on our premises for emergency fire evacuations. As JK correctly pointed out it is the responsibility of the controller of the premises to ensure safe evacuation of all staff and visitors. The DDA is also a primary obligation for ensure reasonableness to those who are unable to evcuate under normal circumstances. Interestingly we manage to ensure persons can enter the premises, so it bear true that we should enable effective egress and evacuation too. I see a strong moral side that come into this and the risks should be realised for all staff and those with different types of disabilities. You should not rely on the fire brigade to assertian the quantum of risks to evacuate your staff, these should be foreseeable and every reasonable effort should be countered for this. I've provided strategic refuge points for safe protection and this is structured around evacuation chairs and trained operators to take anyone down after the steward has given the all clear of a respective floor. This way everyone has safely evacuated and no one should be in the building. Communication and cooperation is the key here. Yes admitedly, training can be problematic along with holidays and sickness, but ensure effeective cover of more trained staff to enable this. The moral and integrity of staffs overide every issue along with our duties under the FSO. We should be able to quantify the risks against costs and the DDA try to give that balance too. Sorry if this seem a rant, but not my intention as I'm proud to promote sensible and pragmatic H&S into our culture and its everyone responsiblity to look after ourselves and each other. It showed the company cares and makes an effort and this is improved by staff attitudes, makes H&S approchable if they ever require my advice anytime. Thanks James
Admin  
#15 Posted : 21 March 2007 10:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete Stewart Surely the DDA takes precedence over the RRO in these cases? If you know you will have persons who will need assistance to evacuate a building then reasonable adjustments MUST be made. To my mind, first response is to locate these individuals on the ground floor. Then there is no need to consider the cost of special equipment, training, maintenance (an ongoing cost) etc required to get them out.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 21 March 2007 16:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael McBride In my previous job we had a few evac chairs. it was the training of operatives that was the main problem. We also asked the disabled staff if they would like to use them when we practised, some did, some didn't. We had a refuge for the disabled staff and the evacuated after the other 1400 staff had gone.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 22 March 2007 00:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor Bob, our concern about the view you expressed was regarding the impression given that the LFB had said that the assisted evacuation of disabled persons should be left to the firefighters (ie 'the professionals) whereas their view (and the legislation and guidance) is that it must not be left to the firefighters but is a matter for the dutyholder. Andrew, you mentioned the possible use of lifts for the evacuation of disabled persons. Both firefighting lifts and evacuation lifts may be used by Management in this way if safe to do so as they have additional protection against fire and failure of the power supply. It may also be possible to use a standard lift for this purpose based upon good risk assessment involving information obtained from persons competent and knowledgeable in fire, electrics, lifts, the building construction and its services, etc but this should not be considered lightly as the last thing you want is persons trapped in an immobile lift in a building fire. Consideration could, of course, be given to upgrading an existing lift to evacuation lift standard.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 22 March 2007 09:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Hewett Kevin, This may be of some use although it is primarily aimed at alterations during construction or refurbishment it does contain some use info in the guidance. BS 5588 Fire Precautions in the design and construction of buildings – Part 8: Code of practice for means of escape for disabled people. Regards, Alan
Admin  
#19 Posted : 22 March 2007 09:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Lawrence Pete - The DDA is for the employer is to make reasonable adjustments that suit the purpose of the premises and its environment. Personally, I find the Act still too open and its the employers responsibility to ensure acceptability of access and egress arrangements. Of course they may be challenged or fined, however it not a 'Shall' or 'Must' requirement. Thats my interpretation and we must use other Acts and regs to to ensure acceptable levels of risks, which allow us in society to behave in a appropriate manner.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.