Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 March 2007 11:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By rb Hello all, I work for a shopfitting company who at the moment are in the design process for potentially refitting a fairly small, but high end mountain bike store. I have seen the designs and the designers have moved a bulk head fairly close to a spinkler head. The shop is relatively long and narrow in shape with 8 sprinkler heads in the store in two rows of four. The bulk head that has been moved affects one of the sprinklers at the corner of the layout. Is there any guidance as to how close we can move this bulkhaead, or any other structure for that matter, to the sprinkler head?? I have looked at the Building Regs Part B, and the new RR(FS)O guidance for offices and shops but have not been able to find anything. Many thanks for any assistance Richard
Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 March 2007 12:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever Richard Your reference should be British Standard 5306: Part 2, Specification for sprinkler systems, Section 26 - Sprinkler spacing, arrangement and location. Unfortunately this is a very expensive document. I'm not an expert on sprinkler systems and without spending time and reading it I can't help you much. I would recommend that you speak to your client and explain that this is a material alteration and they should therefore review their fire risk assessment to identify the impact of the works you are carrying out. My gut feeling is that if they are moving the bulkhead closer to the sprinkler heads then this is unlikely to make much difference. A change in the sprinkler head might be appropriate e.g. sidewall sprinkler head. I think the bigger problem would be if they are moving the bulkhead away from the sprinkler head. This could result in some of the floor area being unprotected.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 March 2007 12:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Generally I'm in agreement with Shaun. However speak to your local Fire Brigade. I remember designing a sprinkler system in accordance with the Fire Officer's Rules. There is/was a book not as expensive as the BS standard. Anyway, so long as all areas are covered at the correct temperatures and volumes, with no areas shielded from the spray then you are probably OK. Your problem might be at the other side of the partition where the head may not cover the area up to the partition. Merv
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 March 2007 13:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Waldram On the other hand, why is a sprinkler a sensible fire control measure in a bike shop? I wouldn't expect the fire load to be that significant and, if there is good control of potential ignition sources and minimal risk of out-of-hours spread from other areas of the building or fire-raising break-ins, then maybe none of the heads are needed! I realise this may be part of a wider design standard - I recall once seeing sprinkler heads above a swimming pool in a US hotel, where they were obviously a standard layout for each floor, regardless of what was in the area!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 March 2007 13:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Geoff Dale Richard May I suggest discussing this with the company who services the sprinkler system? They might be able to help. They will probably want to know of any proposed changes anyway or it may invalidate their service agreement. Insurers may also need to be notified beforehand as well, this was my experience for some work on our system. Geoff
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 March 2007 16:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ashley Wood from your posting I would assume that this is a shop within a retail mall or you have accommodation above? Firstly, a sprinkler design is based on a code of practice ie Light Hazard, Ordinary hazard, etc etc. The code that applies to the premises as a whole will require a volume of water known as the K-Factor from each nozzle at a defined pressure. this then equates to Xmm/M2/Per min. You may find that by bringing a partition in reduces the need for the old nozzle anyway, at the same time it may require additional nozzles in the old area. The distance from a wall could vary and is dependant on the room layout, combustibility of ceiling, height etc. The distance could be as low 250mm and as high as 1.5m depending on what I have said. I would look at an ideal being in the range of 500-750mm. As previously said, speak to the maintaining contractor. Hope this helps.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.