Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 April 2007 14:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By adam edwards

As you know, smokers retain a continuing right to smoke in their own (domestic) properties. Persons working in their employ (service engineers, repair staff etc) cannot use the new legislation against them in any way.

However I would be interested to hear of any policies other business have with regard to staff working in environments where householders smoke.

Does anyone permit individual staff to refuse to work in those situations?

Adam Edwards

Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 April 2007 15:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Hi Adam,

This has been discussed at least twice recently, do a search under smoking.

We won't allow individual staff to refuse to work, but we will require them to notify us and let their supervisors withdraw service. Since we work in care provision to vulnerable people we feel that if our staff just walked out the cure could be worse than the disease,

John
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 April 2007 18:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
Adam,

check the regulations. Domestic premises where visiting service workers are present are excluded unless the occupier is engaged in a work activity with the visitor.

Inviting a workmate around for a gossip about the kids or the old man and to have a fag is not covered unless the conversation turns to work-related matters.

However, I am totally with those who make efforts to prevent occupiers from smoking in the presence of the service worker.

Well, almost totally. I'm still not convinced about the "passive smoking" bit : "may possibly lead to some hundred of deaths per year" is not a sufficiently scientific conclusion to my mind.

Anyone for a pipe full ?

Merv
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.