Rank: Guest
|
Posted By tez I have a bee in my bonnet about the wearing -or should i say non wearing of them.
Speaking as a parent as well, whilst waiting to collect my children from primary school (after a hard days graft), i notice countless mums and dads not wearing a belt and even worse failing to make sure their young children wear theirs.
I also have tiddly peeps( young children for those who dont watch early morning kids tv) and i am damed if i ever let them in the car or the older ones without them wearing their seat belts.
I feel like approaching the school about running a seat belt campaign with the local police-has anyone tried this or another idea???
I feel like asking the parents if they love their children and if they say yes, telling them that they dont or why else would they let their child not wear a belt. Yes i know that approach would prob get me a fisty in the face reply
As a driver of over 20 years now-are we paying through our insurance premiums for those who have accidents and claim compo who were not wearing a belt.
I know the police are busy with other crime, but whats the news on enf action they have taken over the none wearing of belts by driver or passenger. On the spot fines?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bill Parkinson I know of instances in my area of police stopping vehicles and fining people. There have also been some cases in the local press where people have been taken to court and fined but would suggest it is whether the police deem it as a priority. Currently in our area they have issued tickets and penalty points to 207 people driving whilst using hand held mobile phones so this seems to be the campaign at present.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By RichardJ Agree it happens at times at our local school. Currently there is a 'name and shame' policy for parents who park on the zig-zags outside the school whereby the car registration is put on the weekly newsletter handed out to all parents. However, I'm not sure whether parents feel guilty about this? I might approach the school to get them to observe and to start 'naming and shaming' parents that don't use seat belts for themselves or children...... but will it make a difference?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Aileen Williams I wouldn't think that many claims would succeed if the injured were not wearing seat belts at the time. Another example of parents putting their own convenience before the safety of their children. Just as irritating are those people who insist on letting their small yappy dog sit on the rear parcel shelf (a distraction to following drivers and a potential missile in the event of an accident) or - even worse - on the driver's lap.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Aileen Williams And another thing that really irritates me (there are a lot, today!) is the number of parents who let their children out of the car on the road side, directly into passing traffic (or even more irritating flinging open the drivers door thus holding up the passing traffic so that their offspring can alight) rather than making them get out on the pavement side.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mir-cat I too totally agree and just to prove how people do not consider the risks...
I was sitting in the passenger seat in a garage while the driver had gone in to pay for their petrol, and I noticed a lady coming back to her large four wheel drive car (at the next pump) with a couple of children - one about 8 or 9yrs and one about 5yrs.
She proceeded to let the 9yr old into the back and shut the door and then sat the 5 yr old in the front passenger seat and struggled with him to strap the seatbelt in place while shouting at the one in the back to sit down and be quiet.
My point? Well apart from the fact that the older one did not put on a belt, the younger one had been put in the front (illegal under 12yrs I believe) and neither of them had proper booster seats as I believe is now required by law (or am I wrong with that one?). She then went round to the drivers door and almost needed climbing gear to get in (very small lady - very large car).
As a driver (and a mother) I wonder what would happen if an incident occurred. Would the small person be able to handle the large car sufficiently to prevent her unrestrained child from going through the windscreen or the small one being garroted by the seat belt in an emergency stop or an accident.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rob T whilst I agree that minors should be protected from themselves I vehemently disagree with those who seem to get up tight with other adults doing something that they consider dangerous. What business is it of any of you whether an adult wears a seatbelt in a car? They are not going to hurt anyone but themselves are they? The same with crash helmets! Why is it that people who get involved with safety then get all quasi-religious, arrogant and sometimes rude on the subject and think they have some sort of right to lecture to other adults on their safety when in their own time.
As H&S professionals we have a duty by Charter to help where Safety problems exist during working hours - absolutely no right to busy-body when people are not at work.
No wonder we get a hard time in the press. Clarkson is just so right about some of our number.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bill Parkinson The comment that they are not hurting anyone but themselves is not correct as vehicle drivers etc faced with a child running into their path will take steps to avoid a collision which then can result in other people becoming injured.
You also forget that this is a discussion forum for people involved with health and safety and as a profession we do make comments about other people's behaviour whether they put themselves at risk or others.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rob T But what's avoiding a collision got to do with wearing a seatbelt, unless you mean that they might fly out of the front windscreen and bodily hit the child!! A bit confused on that point one.
My point is not that you shouldn't discuss, just that people are getting in a self-righteous lather about what another adult does without hurting anyone else. Remember suicide is not illegal!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight Hi Rob,
I have mixed feelings about this; in essence you're right about the right to make decisions involving only personal risk, but there are a few other factors as you well know, though I have my doubts about their validity as arguments. One is that there is a cost to bear for all of us if individuals injure themselves. It costs a good six figure sum to sort out a serious road casualty, and that comes from everybody's NI and general taxation. Then there's the poor blighters who have to clean up and cart any bits off to hospital, they would much rather not have to do that, I'm sure. And finally, there's an attitude thing, and this I do agree with. Driving a car is a socially involved act, and is an earned privilege. Too many people see it in purely selfish terms as a right, and will default on their side of the licence as it suits. Not wearing seatbelts is part of that problem, and the attitude problem is, in my opinion, the worst one we currently face on the roads, as drivers and as safety professionals.
In other words, its the law, a licence is issued on condition that the driver keeps to the law. If they don't like it, they can lobby their MP, but in the meantime they should just do it,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rob T Maybe John, but that's a police issue not a safety one. Personally I'm not an idiot and I wear a seat belt but I wouldn't dream of telling another adult to wear one.
This country is getting dangerously near to becoming a police state with personal freedoms being eroded at every session of parliament. Council snoopers allowed into your houses, 3 fifth's of the worlds cameras watching us, banning everything that minority groups don't like. Education is the way forward not being intrusive into peoples everyday lives. there will come a backlash!
Ban's are not the answer. In my safety role I try to explain why a rule or procedure is in place - I do not go in stating law from the off. If I have to "lay down the law" I will always give options about how to complete a task - never just say that "it's not allowed".
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By peter gotch and Rob, the driver who doesn't use their seat belt is often the driver using the hand held, and/or driving through red light....definitely not only putting themselves at risk, but the rest of us too.
I run the gauntlet of getting to/from office across the road at the traffic lights on a daily basis.
Can assure you that at very busy junction, waiting for the green man is NOT the signal to cross.
Warning indicators....
4x4 or Personalised number plate or Phone or Broadcasting loud music with windows open
often = will run the red light.
Regards, Peter
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight Hi Rob,
Hm, as a pronounced civil libertarian I don't think we are anything like a police state; for example, a huge proportion of the cameras are in private hands (like NCP and FirstBus), nothing to do with the state. And as for minority groups and doing nothing they don't like, really, that just isn't how it works.
And in any event, seat-belt law goes back to the 1970s, long before the clarion calls about 'nanny state' and the closely related 'stealth taxes'. Most of today's drivers accepted their license on condition that they wear a belt, and that for me is that,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John J Peter, as a 4x4 driver I'm disappointed you are doing exactly what we often accuse the press of doing and taking a minority of individuals and using them as a basis for pointing the finger at all members of that group.
I've recently read the 'Grumpy Old Mens Handbook' and I feel it may be usefull reading for all of us here. I certainly identified myself in it and one or two others are demonstrating the worrying traits.
The best lesson I have ever experienced with seatbelts was as a 17 year old lad in my mates car. On the day the mandatory seatbelt law came in we were at tech college. I put on my belt but he said 'I'm not wearing a belt because I know how to drive'. He then proceeded to wheelspin off the gravel car park. As soon as the wheels gripped on the tarmac road the car changed direction and slammed into a lamp post. Result - I was fine and he lost four of his front teeth on the steering wheel. He had been driving for two weeks.
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 It is true then, Victor Meldrew lives!!!
If it bugs you then deal with it there and then. If you don't have the courage or skill to do so, acquire the wisdom to know when to pass on by.
If you were thinking of getting involved, I liked the idea of trying to persuade the school to lead on a safety information shot about kids and car safety. Maybe even having something in a classroom session talking to the kids about their safety in the car might help it to appear less draconian and still get the message to the parents. Why not talk to your school governors about it as a bit of friendly observation stuff for their consideration, you might even want to help with materials or content?
Yours A very grey-haired (well whats left anyway),cap wearing, bearded, elbow patched old safety chap.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By tez I see the chat has taken a interesting twist.
My concern, expressed by many comments posted here, is about the costs we are forking out, through claims,nhs,insurance premiums, police,fire etc etc etc when drivers and passengers have been involved, that others have to pick up.
That is my issue.....
Its not about being nanny state, its about all the insurance costs we as householders, employers and drivers or cars pay out for every year, that are rising due to claims, which are a mixture of genuine and fraudulent...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jackw. Hi, you do seem to have a bee in your bonnet about this. But i can't help agreeing with you re irresponsible parents, drivers etc. re no seat belts, kids sitting on peoples laps in front seats, standing in the middle of the rear of the car. My fav was passing a car, albeit in slow moving traffic were a child had has his head up and out through the sun roof.. very scary.. one bump and, as the french said "off with his head". problem is that it is a personal decision to put the kids at risk and obviously break the law. How about a campaign to have them walk the kids to school? better all round for everyone and of course the environment. on that am i the only one fed up with the issue of "green" being shoved down my throat.. the new hobby horse of the tree hugger..hmmm controversial or what! cheers all. friday yipee.. aff tae the pub..nope not organic beer!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By peter gotch John J
On the contrary I did not tar all with the same brush.
However, years of dynamic risk assessments, and observation of one of the busiest junctions in Glasgow - the M8 off ramp from the Kingston Bridge leads onto Bothwell Street where I work - demonstrates a clear correlation between a number of behaviours [as stated - and often in multiple] and the running of red lights.
Regards, Peter
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By tez Thank you for all comments. i shall approach the school/local police.
Sensible risk management i advocate-however with bee in my bonnet-nick em all i say.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John J Peter,
Having only used this junction once, last February, I bow to your greater experience and courage! I didn't run the light so I may have helped improve the frequency rate for 4x4s
John
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.