Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 April 2007 10:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan
I want to get a reasonably reliable estimate of keystroke rates of DSE users in offices.

I should be appreciative if you would let me know of any reliable instrument or software for measuring it, and where I can source it/them.

If you have tried to use one or more measures but found them more trouble than they're worth, I should also be appreciative for any information.

(Incidentally, please don't reply: ask a safety ergonomist. I am a registered ergonomist and CMIOSH!)
Admin  
#2 Posted : 26 April 2007 12:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lilian McCartney
Hi kieran,

I don't know of any makes etc but you used to be able to get these through typing skills courses, some of which were on line.

I guess they'll still have these somewhere on the web.

Local colleges may also have systems.

Lilian
Admin  
#3 Posted : 26 April 2007 12:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Thanks, Lilian

Regrettably, within the general risk management principle of 'reasonable practicability', I don't regard the practice of either research or learning activities as acceptable references to control for DSE-type injuries.

In the real world, 'distractions' and appropriate 'rest and recuperation' breaks as well as job variation involve radically different parameters.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 26 April 2007 12:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Meiklejohn
The problem with the software packages is that they may not be doing the job that you want to monitor whilst using it.

For a small sample you could use video capture and physically count them. Speak to your IT dept, if you have one, they may be able to help you.

Andrew
Admin  
#5 Posted : 26 April 2007 12:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T
You could of course just use Word Count on Outlook.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 26 April 2007 13:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackw.
Excuse my ignorance of the subject. But why would you count the number of key strokes?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 26 April 2007 13:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rachael Palmer
Kieran,

How about videoing the typist over a given period of time and then replay in slow motion and count the keystrokes.

Rachael
Admin  
#8 Posted : 26 April 2007 15:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By cara
I vaguely remember using a typing program called Mavis Beacon teaches to type (or something) - it came free with my old PC and it measured typing speeds.
Sorry I cannot be more specific but have a search for something similar on the net?!
Admin  
#9 Posted : 26 April 2007 17:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Nicholls
Hi Kieran

When a document is typed, the keystrokes and word count can be accessed quite easily.

For docs in MY DOCUMENTS Folder RIGHT CLICK on the chosen document icon,this brings up a menue on the bottom of the menu click on PROPERTIES, this brings up another menu with Folder headings. Click on summary, ALL WILL BE REVEALED AS THEY SAY.

Regards Alan N
Admin  
#10 Posted : 26 April 2007 17:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Many thanks to all correspondents

Regrettably 'legal privilege' prevents me giving details other than to explain that the thrust behind my question was a very detailed question by a barrister in response to an expert witness report.

Alan N's reply is most useful as I'm trying to ascertain 'reasonably practicable' ways in which an employer can gauge the pace of work in an office. And to tell the truth, I didn't know what he referred to.

Very interesting to note the video suggestions: as I've never yet found a company willing to pay for data gathering of this kind, I would need evidence to support the view that it can be classified as a 'reasonably practicable' control measure.

My understanding is that this criterion has been the basis on which ISO standards on usability of hardware and software have not become benchmarks in occupational safety and health.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 26 April 2007 18:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JasonGould

This may be too simplistic but what about the Mavis Beacon Typing software.

I never got past 35wpm and never did overtake the car

It is probably less than a tenner now

Again srory if this was not the answer you wanted
Admin  
#12 Posted : 26 April 2007 19:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin Maguire
I believe you may find this link to be of some help: http://www.anappaday.com.../10/day-17-wpm-tray.html

It appear's to be a background program that runs in the system tray to log the WMP in a graph.

Hope it help's.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 26 April 2007 19:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Kieran,

Count the pieces of paper! Regardless of the type of output, there will be an industry or business average. This multiplied by the number of pieces of paper will give you the individual's output.

I would expect a competent supervisor to know and measure the business output; too little output means potentially slacking, training needs, or injury; too much output means quality problems, not taking breaks or cutting corners.

Regards Adrian Watson
Admin  
#14 Posted : 26 April 2007 19:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Kieran,

Count the pieces of paper! Regardless of the type of output, there will be an industry or business average. This multiplied by the number of pieces of paper will give you the individual's output. The number of pieces of paper multiplied by the average number of characters divided by time will give you a typing rate.

I would expect a competent supervisor to know and measure the business output; too little output means potentially slacking, training needs, or injury; too much output means quality problems, not taking breaks or cutting corners.

Regards Adrian Watson

Admin  
#15 Posted : 26 April 2007 19:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Thanks again for thoughtful and ingenious (if not wacky) ideas.

In this instance, there's never been any question about the competence and commitment of the employee (herself a manager) in several decades' employment with the same company.

Competence and commitment, without adequate risk assessment and management don't safeguard anyone against painful, chronic musculo-skeletal problems, unfortunately.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 27 April 2007 07:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Kieran,

With great respect, provide basic information! The inference in your question was this person is a supervised person; why otherwise would you want to monitor work rate?

If this person is a manager then everything changes as she would be self pacing; as such I would not reasonably expect her employer to monitor her output. (i.e. count keystrokes).

Furthermore, I would suggest that whilst keystroke pressure and repetition rate may be a risk factor, they are likely to be minor risk factors. Individual factors such as size, shape, pre-existing injury or environmental factors such as workstation design (including chair and keyboard) or layout are likely to be greater risk factors.

Regards Adrian
Admin  
#17 Posted : 27 April 2007 07:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Very briefly, Adrian

My enquiry and later comments indicated that I'm simply checking out in relation to a question by a barrister.

That I happen to already have thought of all you've now written is by the way: some barristers intentionally try to find a basis for the utterly impractical

'With great respect', to coin your phrase, be so kind as to read what I've already indicated clearly and carefully above before donning your papal mitre and crozier in your infallibility again.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 27 April 2007 08:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Dear Kieran,

I apologize if I've caused offence.

Regards Adrian.

P.S. I'm off now, to look after the flock!
Admin  
#19 Posted : 28 April 2007 11:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Thank you, Adrian

Short-term stress reaction on my part, probably.

You and others might find it helpful to get some feedback on the underlying reality.

After I smoked out the solicitor dealing with the case, I figured out that arrogance matched only by his ignorance was, and maybe still is, the root cause of difficulty.

As he is still dragging his feet about finalising particulars of the case, I suspect that the 'Counsel', to whom he referred orally and in writing, is his own alter ego.

Although he cites the DSE Regs, he obviously has either not read the associated Guidance or simply doesn't understand it. He's still mentally back in the days of 'time and motion industrial engineering' and wanted me to endorse his 'Charlie Chaplin' model of workplace pseudo-ergonomics.

Am I just naive in expecting solicitors to be sufficiently literate and committed to understand what they themselves write?
Admin  
#20 Posted : 28 April 2007 18:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ged
Hi Kieran,

Why not just give the operators a piece of work to type after having counted all the letters and spaces previously before the "test"

Then divide the result by five to give you the wpm that have been typed.
That is how the military used to do it.

Ged
Admin  
#21 Posted : 02 May 2007 15:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graham Lovell
I don’t know if anyone is still reading this but may I say it all comes down to training. My wife when she was an administrator regular typed at 100/125 words a minute. She has her Diploma at Level 3 RSA for text processing. Before this she was trained to type.

However this would not stop her from getting tendon problems etc. For this they need training form the DSE Regs in why the need breaks and to understand what is classed as a break. I.e filing.

Breaks can be difficult for ‘data in-putters’ who do not answer phones etc. and have no let up in their inputting or keyboard/mouse use.

From my experience of undertaking DSE assessments, it’s the training of staff and their Managers/Supervisor to understand this, that is one of the biggest issues, that these persons need breaks and not to flog a dead horse. The user must also understand what to lookout for by way of stains/pain etc. and report it. As well as how to setup their workstation and what exercises a user can do for their arms, back and legs etc.

The last issues to look at is to get users to use the keyboard more and use the mouse (rodent) less or use a tablet etc. It can be gripping the mouse that can cause the stains etc. but straight fast typing overs hours can as well.

Also if laptops are being used for more than a short use, they are set up correctly and have a separate keyboard and mouse.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 02 May 2007 15:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Thanks for your thoughtful observations, Graham
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.