Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 May 2007 15:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Christopher
If I am employed as a competent person within an organisation, does that mean that I could find myself in court as the expert witness for the organisation.

How do you define expert?

Anyone any experience of having to go into court as the expert witness?

I have been asked to do so for an organisation that I left some considerable time ago, and would appreciate any ones' thoughts on this matter.

I know that I could received expert witness training, I'm just not sure what it means.

Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 May 2007 15:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Assuming you understand what is intended by 'competent person' within the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, it's simpler to focus on the 'expert witness' role.

Essentially, the EW role is that of someone with demonstable expertise in a domain that is central to a dispute. He/she may be appointed as a 'party expert' by the solicitor acting for the Claimant or Defendant or as a joint expert by both sets of solicitors.

Since 1999, the role of the expert witness is defined within the Civil Procedure Rules of the Department of Constitutional Affairs and regulated by a protocol of the Civil Justice Council (2005).

The process is explicitly designed to assist the Court to evaluate evidence with the help of specialist expertise; so an EW is obliged by the CPR and the protocol to sign that he/she is doing that. As his/her independence is central, any source of declared bias is likely to have his/her evidence rejected; any undeclared bias could also result in rejection and possibly a penalty by the Court.

HOpe that may give you a gist that you can build on by using Google or Yahoo to investigate further.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 15 May 2007 15:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Blenkharn
I have worked as an expert witness in the filed of waste management, infection control, hygiene and biosafety for many years, and continue to do so.

There are no specific qualifications that make you an expert witness, or even an expert! But you do need to know your subject inside out, be fully up-to-date and have a considerable experience in your field. You need to be at the top of your geame. Many so called expert witnesses are savaged at their first attempt by being unfamiliar with their subject and unable to withstand being cross-examined by an experienced QC. It's one hell of an experienced for the uninitiated - and still is after all these years! But you're not likely ever to get that far unless you can prove by your CV that you are the person for the job, and impress the instructing solicitor. They do use several registers of established experts, and look for publications, and lecturing/teaching on the subject, and compare the experience of several potential experts for each case. Once you have been accepted into the system and have a proven track record, with periodic review by legal teams you have worked with, more work generally follows.

Training is available - but its very expensive. It will not tell you anything about your specialty, but how to prepare reports, how to work in Court and elsewhere, how to present information, etc. It is well worth it but don't consider that training just to find work as an expert witness.

Don't go down this route unless you are very very very experienced in your field. You will have a duty to your clients and, more importantly, a duty to the Court, to be on top of your subject. If not, the penalties can be severe indeed. And your professional reputation is at stake. Bad news spreads fast!

As a competent person, there is some measure of experience, by time served on the job, training or qualification etc. Not so with an expert witness, but in the Courts a Judge or Barrister will soon flush out the unwary or inexperienced and dispatch them ruthless efficiency. That, plus the close vetting by the instructing solicitor before instruction is given has been considered sufficient to maintain standards.

Ian
Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 May 2007 16:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Christopher
Thank you both, your responses have been really helpful.

If I have given the impression that I was willing to be classed as an expert witness then I have misled you both. I am not comfortable with the organisation applying that title to me for their own convenience.

Admin  
#5 Posted : 16 May 2007 10:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Diane Thomason
Christopher
I can understand your problem.
I'm no expert on this and stand to be corrected by someone who is - but I was under the impression that normally the EW would be an "independent" expert - i.e. someone from outside the organisation who specialises in this kind of work.
I don't think the company can just nominate you to be an EW on their behalf. You can be a witness, yes, but not necessarily an EW which is something different altogether.
As I say I'm willing to be corrected if this is wrong.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 16 May 2007 12:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Diane,

There is nothing that prevents a court from appointing or allowing the appointment of an expert from one of the parties to the case.
However, when allowing such an appointment the court will always (as in every other case) weigh up the possibility of bias.

It must be remembered though, that an expert's duty is to the court and not to the appointing solicitor. Any expert who lies is committing perjury and any expert who is partisan may be in contempt of court. In either case there are serious sanctions available to the court.

Regards Adrian
Admin  
#7 Posted : 16 May 2007 13:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Christopher Kelly
Expert witness is different than a competent person. The competent person has duties to fulfil certain responsibilities for a company (eg carry out Thorough Exam of lifting equipment).

A competent person could be an expert witness, however most reputable expert witnesses are on a register. There was a case recently where an expert witness was proved to be wrong and was then found not to be on the register of expert witnesses - severely criticised.

An expert witness could be called to give evidence against you / your company, or on your behalf / in your defence. Competent person is more likely to be in the chair explaining why they did or did not do something.

If I were you I would go and see a solicitor, make sure you get someone with experience in this area, before becoming an expert witness.

Regards,
Chris
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.