Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 June 2007 11:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
Can anybody see any problems with having plugged in proprietary rechargable torches instead of installed emergency lighting?

The proviso being they are regularly checked to 1) see if they are still there and 2) they are working.

Or should this practice be restricted to being a temporary measure only?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 June 2007 12:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dan Malone
Hi Peter,

My thoughts on this is that you will need proper emergency lighting. The reason for this is that in a power outage the lights rum off batteries. Flashlights have a smaller illumination field then proper lights would have.
Have you contact a fire officer on this question. It might be the right way to go. Remember that they can issue a closure notice on the spot if they feel you are not obeying the law.

Anyone other points?

Hope this helps
Dan Malone
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 June 2007 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Peter,

You'd have to find the torch, pick it up and turn it on in the dark in a fire (maybe); don't like the idea at all,

John
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 June 2007 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Geoff Parkinson
Torches may be acceptable under certain circumstances. As a local authority fire officer (now moved on) I visited a number fo premises where torches were allowed when supported by an appropriate risk assessment. Most local authority fire officers should be able to give advice/guidance :-)
Admin  
#5 Posted : 18 June 2007 12:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
I can't remember exactly so I'm sure somebody will correct me but the specification for emergency lighting is that the centreline of the area to be lit must achieve a certain amount of light (0.2 lux?) at waist height and the light must be unbroken i.e. no intermittent areas of shade. Also certain areas are required to be illuminated e.g. changes in level, changes in direction, signage, fire points etc. Not sure if your torches will achieve this, however I am aware that for a temporary measure they have been accepted but so long as it is not long term.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 18 June 2007 12:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
I suppose I tend to think about the workplaces I am responsible for; our workers are required to assist in evacutaion, and we have large complex ground-plans; hence my wholly negative approach. Maybe it could work for smaller places,

John
Admin  
#7 Posted : 18 June 2007 12:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
I forgot to mention

a) the torches have a setting that switches the torches on when the power fails and this can be either main beam or flashing

b) battery life is easily one hour


And as an aside I used to be on a village hall committee and our emergency light if there were more than 20 people in the hall was a candle above the only door out!
Admin  
#8 Posted : 18 June 2007 15:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Peter

I think it would be determined by the risks i.e. hazards and people. In my working environment with members of the public, emergency lighting would have to be a permanent fixture with a failure back up system.

Torches would only be suitable as an emergency if all else failed or to assist if necessary.

Ray
Admin  
#9 Posted : 18 June 2007 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
I've always gone for 1-hour automatic battery powered emergency lights. Shaun's advice is good.

Portable torches as an additional aid only.

I once sent the night shift home during a power cut. Got a real "talking to" from the production manager the next morning. He left. I stayed.

Merv

Merv
Admin  
#10 Posted : 18 June 2007 19:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
Oh yes I forgot to mention one thing. The lights are also there for the benefit of the fire service who will be entering the building after they have isolated the power.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 18 June 2007 20:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
They don't carry their own lighting then?
Admin  
#12 Posted : 18 June 2007 20:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
Obviously never been a fireman then Peter!

Yes they carry torches but they also carry hoses, bretahing apparatus, cutting gear, bodies.....
Admin  
#13 Posted : 18 June 2007 21:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
No. but I watched Towering Inferno and they had hat lamps!
Admin  
#14 Posted : 18 June 2007 22:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48
Peter
Yes but what and how comprehensive my concern would be in practice depends entirely on the detail that you clearly leave out of your posting.
Have you ever seen the use of standard torches mentioned anywhere in any relevant standards; either to support or deny their use?
But then again maybe you are merely testing a principle? Who knows?
Are there any circumstances where you would consider the provision of torches to be adequate? We could then debate your opinion for while rather than just receive your acerbic responses.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 19 June 2007 08:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
Explain 'acerbic'.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 19 June 2007 09:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
Much like emails, the intention of the writer can often be misinterpreted by the reader. I just wanted to confirm that I did not feel that the responses were acerbic, I saw it just as a bit of light hearted banter.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 19 June 2007 09:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
So did I Shaun, I think the comment is a runover from another thread - a pity.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 19 June 2007 09:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brigham
Never saw you as "sharp" Peter....
Admin  
#19 Posted : 19 June 2007 10:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
Nor me!!!!
Admin  
#20 Posted : 19 June 2007 11:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Lewis
A Fire Crew came to visit us for a look round and asked about e.lights in a temporary storage area where 4 guys worked intermittently. They took advice and were told by their boss at the station that torches were OK for a limited period until we could get proper lighting in; unless we could assure them that the building would be gone by a certain date.

The contents of the building had a low fire loading, the skin was low risk and the aisles inside were kept clear at all times. We put in torches for the period of the rental, trained our chaps on what to do in an emergency and there were no problems. The building went on the due date, it was something like 12 weeks hire.

John
Admin  
#21 Posted : 19 June 2007 12:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
Thanks John, I think that neatly answers the question.

To recap: torches like this would be sufficient in some cases depending on the circumstance, but it would usually be only as a temporary measure.

Thanks for the contributions.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 20 June 2007 23:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48
Peter, if I hurt your feelings it was not intended; however I choose not to respond to your imperative demand.
I would however like to clarify my position with regard to your question. There has been clear and simple guidance, in the UK, on this area of emergency lighting for many, many years. I have not detected any significant change in current guidance apart from the change to specific workplace guidance that places different emphasis according to risk.
As an example to demonstrate, from the offices and shops version we get
"The size and type of your premises and the risk to the occupants will determine the complexity of the emergency escape lighting required. Borrowed lighting may be suitable in small premises where the light is from a dependable source, e.g. street lamps, and it will adequately illuminate escape routes. Where borrowed lighting is not suitable, then a number of torches, in strategic positions, can be considered."
Whereas for cinemas and theatres we get
"A comprehensive system of fixed automatic escape lighting is likely to be needed in most cinemas, theatres, etc."

Sort of makes sense really and I just have this feeling that I am telling you something you already know.
If not, and you want to follow up in more detail you can try this website
http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1162101 where you will find the current UK guidance.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 21 June 2007 06:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard C Price
Emergency lighting should be supplied from the loacl local lighting circuit, so that if you loose power in the area the emergency lights come on, unless the emergency lights are fed via a central battery system. We had torches as a backup to assist in the event of power loss.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.