Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 09 July 2007 15:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Sutton
One of our employees had a minor accident in 2005 and reported it only in January of this year (2007)claiming that a medical condition has arisen from the injury. Two questions then arise:-

1. Is there a time limit on making accident book entries ?
2. What is the company's liability if the accident wasn't reported at the time of the incident ?

Any comments gratefully received.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 09 July 2007 15:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
I would assume asap after the incident or at the time.

No liability at all if you did not know?


Admin  
#3 Posted : 09 July 2007 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Sutton
Thanks,

Our company procedures require all accidents and incidents to be reported promptly, my question though is is there a maximum time limit after accident that you can make a report. ie can someone come along 10 years later and make an entry in the accident book ?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 09 July 2007 15:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy

Dave,

within a reasonable period of time for entry of details into accident book. Although depends on what the accident entailed.

I'll bet that he has had words with a legal type chappy and can smell some compo coming his way.

Liability obviously depends on what he is alleging. Ie if its asbestosis or something chronic, then it would nt be in the accident book. If he cut his thumb and 2 years later his thumb drops off, then no accident report means less liability. Two years does seem a little unreasonable, although he does have 3 years in which to submit a claim, which I think will be his next move!!

Holmezy

Admin  
#5 Posted : 11 July 2007 10:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob
Dave,

Does the following info help you :

There is no specific time limit for making an entry in the accident book but the Social Security legislation which governs the keeping of accident books states that ‘’Every employed earner who suffers personal injury by accident in respect of which benefit may be payable shall give notice of such accident either in writing or orally as soon as is practicable after the happening thereof’’. This is of course purely for the purpose of making his benefit claim.

Putting the benefit claim aspect to one side, there is nothing to stop anyone making an entry in the accident book 10 years later but I cannot see how this can possibly help their cause as it will of course be ridiculously backdated.



The second part of your question concerns the company's liability if the accident wasn't reported at the time of the incident. (By ‘wasn’t reported’ I assume you mean wasn’t entered in the accident book)

The company’s liability is not decided by whether or not the incident was recorded in the accident book but by the court in the light of the particular circumstances of the case and it will be up to you to prove that on the balance of probabilities you were not in breach of your duty of care. The accident book entry may be referred to by either side but of far more importance will be more detailed and specific proof that you had indeed discharged your duty………evidence such as risk assessment for that operation, safe system of work in operation at the time, incident investigation reports, witness reports etc. etc. etc.

Holmezy, a point well made but I would clarify that under the Limitation rules:

Where physical injury is concerned the claimant has up to 3 years from the date of the occurrence to make his claim. In the case of disease however (asbestos, noise etc.) the 3 years starts to run from the time that the disease was discovered so a claim could land on your doorstep MANY years later! For this reason it is important to archive as much information as you can information for as long as you possibly can.


Admin  
#6 Posted : 11 July 2007 11:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By LJ
Dave Sutton,
Try this link: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/cp151apa.pdf

LIMITATION ACT 1980
(1980 Chapter 58)
11) Special time limit for actions in respect of personal injuries

LJ
Admin  
#7 Posted : 11 July 2007 11:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob
Exactly Dave

Section 11 of the Act:

11 Special time limit for actions in respect of personal injuries
(4) ....... the period applicable is
three years from--
(a) the date on which the cause of action accrued; or
(b) the date of knowledge (if later) of the person injured.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 11 July 2007 11:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Seamus O Sullivan
Hello David,
I am not sure if you are the David Sutton I know who used to work in ireland, but if you are in ireland the statute of limitations is now 2 years, prviously 3 years( maybe 2004 act but not sure without loking it up). of course if you are in Uk or else where diff statute of limitations apply, of course as always to legal situations there are exceptions to the rule!!!!

one point I would like to hear about is , were the employees encouraged to enter accidents in the accident report book, i am aware of places where they were given hints by managment not to enter small accidents.

With regards to entering accidents in a book, it may be difficult if the employee was unable to do so for some reason.

I always encourage all my clients to enter accidents , it protects both employers and employees.

Sorry for the spelling, it was a long morning.

Seamus
Admin  
#9 Posted : 11 July 2007 11:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Sutton
Seamus,

Not me mate - not been to Ireland yet but would certainly like to. Thanks for the info to everybody anyway - a great source of information and the help is greatly appreciated.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 13 July 2007 19:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheelagh
Hi Seamus,

After reading this thread, I was never asked to report my injury at the time I discussed it with my employer. Next visit to GP and told him of the results, he never mentioned he had any Accident Book and never even suggested where it was and who should fill in what. Am I naive here, are shops excluded from such books. I am now wondering why after 6 months of mentioning and going back and forth to the GP, being signed off sick, it is now essential I should of done this back in January. Could it be that some employers just want you to know as little as possible so that it cannot incriminate them in anyway. When an employer also denies you ever telling him and he remembers nothing about anything, is this another way of avoiding any accident ever occurring?

Just wondering.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 14 July 2007 15:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd
The answer/s to your question/s, are yes. Loads of employers (especially the small business) would prefer to cut-off their arms rather than enter an accident into "the book".
Mistakenly, they asume that that means they cannot be held liable.
I have even be offered a day off with pay to not enter details, and know of several people who had rather more time off (with pay) than that, again for not entering details into "the book". I even know one guy who had a week off (with pay) for not making a fuss after the forklift turned-turtle in the yard (needless to say, riddor was the dirty word).
It is considered (within my union) that the reason many businesses chose to use a computer to hold the details is not for efficiency, but to conceal the info from perusal. Indeed, one safety rep I know was refused access because "this computer also holds business details and other private information"
Admin  
#12 Posted : 14 July 2007 21:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheelagh
John,

Thanks for those answers. Hmmmm I thought yes was the answer. I have always worked for larger organizations in offices where h&s was part of our training etc. This is the first time in a small outlet. No wonder whilst looking for another job for an interview in a office, this guy from the drycleaners offered me a job with him. Seemed at the time I couldnt be choosy as I was a bankrupt and had to get a job somehow. This guy didnt care about me being bankrupt and said I could work for him.

Later on after many months of working there I found out we had a guy work for him taking him to court. Another lady has recently had a heart attack in another of his shops. He blames her for it because she was overweight and had nothing to do with the workload stress etc or physically demanding job. Another lady had cancer and he said straight away he is not liable because his drycleaning chemicals are safe.

Nothing has ever been recorded in accident books because no one knew he had one!!!

My advice is to anyone. Always ask when starting with an employer whether big or small if they have such procedures for entering accidents into a book and where is it kept!!

I am interested to read though all the comments and I wish I knew about this web forum years ago!! Interesting stuff here guys.

Admin  
#13 Posted : 16 July 2007 12:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Interesting thread and not wishing to digress but, I always thought that having an Accident Book at work was a legal requirement, now enforced via the HSE.

However, my present company does not keep accident books but promotes the use of a Incident Reporting System. Thinking about it, the provisions are very similar i. e. injured person completes IRF, copy goes to h&s rep other copy goes to safety department.

I still think it is odd, indeed there seems to be something missing...would appreciate your thoughts on this guys(girls).

Many thanks.

Ray
Admin  
#14 Posted : 16 July 2007 18:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheelagh
Ray,

Not all places are controlled or managed by h&s people. A lot of accidents happen in small retail units where the only h&s person is the boss! If the boss says awww its nothing just get on and do the job then how on earth can people defend their rights to a proper h&s risk assessment?

I have been in large companies where rather than call it an Accident Book they will pretty up the word to and Incident Report Form. All in all its the same thing.

Where is the guidance and protection of those people working in small outlets and do not have such policies like a big office or factory even. All we have is the bosses word that what he says is right!

Think of all the hazard situations working in a small outlet which is family runned. I wonder how many times employees are intimidated into either 'put up, or shut up' situations or otherwise leave or their own accord due to bullying aspects or worse they are dismissed as a trouble maker!

Any comments anyone?
Admin  
#15 Posted : 16 July 2007 19:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Sheelagh (lovely name)

Thanks for your thoughts and I agree many companies do their best to prevent accidents from being reported. However, mine is not one of those, thankfully.

I work in a highly regulated industry and as a company were are also externally audited. Hence not having an Accident Book (BI510) surely must be kosher. I still find it strange and would appreciate if anyone can confirm it is a legal requirement or not.

Ray
Admin  
#16 Posted : 17 July 2007 09:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sally
legal requirement is to record accidents, collecting certain information. The 'accident book' is one way to do this but others are acceptable. Legislation is a social security one rather than a health & safety one.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 19 July 2007 13:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth Parker
hello,
i had an had an accident at work my boss told me to move a pices of metal about 70kg...my back started hurting and complained ...i recived no help or report was placed into the accident book.

now i was injuried for a period of 9 weeks away from work and am still suffering with pain constanly.

even though working hurts me to do i have returned to work.

i have also been harassed and abused verboly for not being able to attened work due to a mild sickness.

i think people who dont care to help and cant fill out accident books sould be sacked...and at best closed down.

your sincerely,
Gareth Parker


Admin  
#18 Posted : 19 July 2007 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth Parker
p.s...your my boss too dave
Admin  
#19 Posted : 19 July 2007 13:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tomahawk
Don't think so ?
Admin  
#20 Posted : 19 July 2007 14:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth Parker
p.p.s....actully your my company owner and not the boss who controls me directly...sorry
Admin  
#21 Posted : 19 July 2007 14:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth Parker
american dude and a sheffield guy?
Admin  
#22 Posted : 19 July 2007 14:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tomahawk
Gareth,

think you are mistaken mate - I don't own any companies and you don't work in our organisation - sorry !
Admin  
#23 Posted : 19 July 2007 18:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gareth Parker
can i have my last 3 posts removed please...thank you
Admin  
#24 Posted : 02 August 2007 13:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Eastbourne
Talking of accident books, is it true that you do not have to have an accident book if you have less than 10 persons? Am sure it's bunkum but would appreciate a definitive answer.

Regards

Marko
Admin  
#25 Posted : 02 August 2007 16:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By anon1234
you don't have to have an accident book fullstop. Although you must have a system for recording all the relevant information e.g. an on-line system. For somewhere employing less than 10 people the accident book is the logical way to go in my view.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 02 August 2007 17:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
No you don't need an accident book if you employ less than 10 people. However, it's still a good idea.

Regards
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.