Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 July 2007 09:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mart If you are a Competent CDM Co-Ordinator is there any benefit from joining the above association? People I've spoken to in the past say it's a "toy town association" and the annual subs are expensive.(Lot of money for very little!)Views and experiences from members past and present very welcome. Mart
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 July 2007 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Gil Hi Mart, I am a similar situation to you, my boss told me I should join, but after discussions with others I was told something similar to what you heard and therefore haven`t joined it yet, but would be interested to see if there are any real benefits from memebership
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 July 2007 10:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GT Mart, If you are comparing across the board as associations go for me personally I think it is one of the better ones. There are no warts, they call a spade a spade! they are professionally led and speak in English, openly and honestly and for me that is very refreshing. Although I do not agree with all things they do..........we cannot please all of the people etc .........just my personal view. Regular updates and interpretations, assistance at a cost, not bogged down with bureaucracy, local branch meetings although unfortunately I am not able to attend due to the nature of my work. For what its worth as a practicing CDM you will find it of value. regards gt
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 July 2007 15:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mart Not really beneficial for the occasional Co-Ordinator then?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 30 July 2007 16:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DMS If you are only an occasional CDM-C, then I think you would gain a lot more from membership as you will not necessarily be so up to date with current requirements and best practice etc.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 July 2007 16:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Just to wind things up a little - The APS is one of the organisations that insists the regulations state that only the client can sign the F10. Even the HSE do not go this far nowadays!! Bob
Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 July 2007 16:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert. I found that the criteria required to achieve the "18 points" was difficult for one person alone to achieve. Still sitting on the fence!
Admin  
#8 Posted : 30 July 2007 17:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Clive Wilmott Mart Until a few months ago I was also of the opinion that it was a waste of time joining the APS but since joining earlier this year I have found the organisation to be of great use. Today I received their August news letter and it is full off useful information including (for Robert Lewis's benefit) an article which clarifies the position on who signs F10's. For those of us who are primarily CDM Coordinators I personally find it very useful. I recently sat their transfer exam to get onto the register of CDMC's and it is looked upon very favourably by our clients. Clive Wilmott.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 31 July 2007 12:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mart Could I not get the same competent advice and information from IOSH and their specialist Construction Group? FOC as well Mart
Admin  
#10 Posted : 31 July 2007 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ciaran McAleenan Dear all, You could always consider an alternative and join the Construction Health, Safety and Welfare Register, administered by the Institution of Civil Engineers. For details check this link; http://www.ice.org.uk/jo...ng_specialist_lists2.asp Following explains; The construction institutions are seeking to raise the standard of Health, Safety and Welfare (HSW) risk management across the industry. As part of this process a Register, overseen by the Institution of Civil Engineers“(ICE“s) Health and Safety Board, but open to members of other associated institutions, has been established for those who wish to demonstrate a defined level of competency in the application of HSW risk management within the construction process. The Register is intended for those individuals who wish to demonstrate that they have built on the level of HSW competence demanded by their professional membership requirements. You will need to have a sound knowledge and understanding of scientific/engineering/technical principles plus experience of construction processes, particularly relating to HSW. You will also need to have a sound knowledge and understanding of processes that are likely to be required in the future use, maintenance, refurbishment or demolition of a project. Download the detailed explanation; http://www.ice.org.uk/downloads//ICE3009(1)_ConstructionHealthSafety&WelfareRegister.pdf Best wishes Ciaran
Admin  
#11 Posted : 31 July 2007 14:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mart Ciaran, ICE Register seems more relevant and better administered i wager. Cheers, Mart
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.