Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew Meiklejohn Hi Guys, Girls and anyone else...
Am just wondering if there is a recommended ratio for the number employees of H&S persons employees? I hear in some states in Australia there are legal requirements for ratios
What is your ratio? what would you like it to be? And what Industry are you in?
At the moment my ratio is currently 900 - 2 was 900 - 1 and will be again soon.... :-(
Would like it to be at least 900 - 3
1 Manager 1 Co-ordinator, and an administrator.
Industry is Engineering/Manufacturing
Answers on a post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sheila EJ Keogh Mine is 500:1 (plus volunteers so add another couple of hundred "staff")!! I work part time, for a charity org, the staff and vols work with young people, lots of lone working, visiting cells, etc - some clients potentially violent, some not....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By biddy wouldnt the ratio match the Hazard/risk lots of employees + high risk jobs = more H&S few employees + low risk = less
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By biddy wouldnt the ratio match the Hazard/risk lots of employees + high risk jobs = more H&S few employees + low risk = less also if its one site or multiple sites
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Daniel Andrew:
In 1979 my manager and I, newly appointed to a group role, set out to standardise the provision of H&S "engineers" (competent, technically-qualified practitioners) across British Leyland, then standing at about 100,000 employees with a variety of local "safety officers".
We came to ratios of 1:1,000 for iron foundries, 1:3,000 for paint, assembly and warehousing, and about 1:1,500 for machine shops. This seemed to be about right and although things have changed in the past 25+ years I still think this would be a useful yardstick.
Unfortunately for you, you come out well staffed by this criteria.
I've since come across many better staffed organisations but I must confess I tend to find that this does not necessariy improve safety or the level of work output.
Dave Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rob Jones 130 to 2 both of which cover H&S as a secondary role.
Industry is food manufacture.
I would prefer both of the H & S roles to be dedicated rather than 'part time'.
RJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.