Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 August 2007 16:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bryan Andrew
Hi,

My colleague and I have been reviewing the info on our Health and safety law poster and we are curious as to who's name/s should be displayed in the "appointed box".
Traditionally it would appear that the H&S departments manager/head/co-coordinator's names have always been displayed, but there are many other people within our company that are "appointed" and have H&S responsibilities.
We are also aware that ultimately the Directors have responsibility for all.
Can anyone offer any advice on who's name/s should be displayed in the appointed Box?

Kind Regards
Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 August 2007 16:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Hoskins
Hi,

We treat this as being the competent source of health and safety advice appointed under Regulation 7 of the Management Regulations.

In our case this is the Health & Safety Officer, but could be others in smaller businesses.

Alan

Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 August 2007 16:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julian Wilkinson
The person who is responsible for managing health and safety i.e the health and safety manager. You can also add it deputies and local reps underneath but ultimately it should be 'management' level

Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 August 2007 17:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PeterL
I agree with the above post the organisations Health and Safety Manager can be classed as the appointed person (delegated responsibility, but this does not detract from the ultimate responsibility lying with the Director or owner under Health and Safety Law, as these persons will ultimately be held responsible for any acts or omissions re: Health & Safety under the Corporate Manslaughter Act.

Pete
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 August 2007 17:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Collins
Pete

The Corporate Manslaughter legislation will not allow the prosecution of individuals....
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 August 2007 17:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Taff2
What if the Director is abroad - will the HSE have powers to chase the directors?
Will they use these powers?
If the answer is possibly, if there is corporate manslaughter - could this mean that foreign directors will only pay lip-service to minor injuries & fractures etc.

Does the law not require the companies in the UK to have UK based directors? (financial)
Admin  
#7 Posted : 21 August 2007 17:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PeterL
Heather,

Should have explained better my meaning was that the Director or owner of a SME would be responsible for any fines levied as a result not culpable of the directing mind or cause and subject to criminal prosecution.

Pete
Admin  
#8 Posted : 21 August 2007 17:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Middleton
The purpose of the poster is to to direct employees to the appropriate person to give H&S advice; in large organisations, this is usually the H&S manager/officer. Smaller organisations may use a consultant, however as employees would not be expected to gain information directly from the consultant, the name of the person responsible for making that contact if necessary should be given.

The name in the square does not direct the HSE to the person to prosecute in the event of failure.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 21 August 2007 18:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT
Heather

Would you care to expand on that one please? I fail to see the relevance as individual prosecution has always been around in other guises and will remain so.

CFT
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.