Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 25 August 2007 11:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By craig b hartley
There was a thread on here in the last 2 weeks concerning the conservatives wanting to cut red tape to save money with safety to be included.
According to the TUC this week,Deaths on construction sites this year could top last year's five year high, new figures suggest. Construction union UCATT said so far this year 29 site deaths have been reported. The union said five construction workers have been killed at work in the last three weeks alone. ' Tony O'Brien, secretary of the Construction Safety Campaign, criticised the government and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). 'They're going into reverse,' he told Contract Journal. 'It's very distressing because if you look at some of these individual events, they are totally preventable.'
Prospect negotiator Mike McDonald, who represents HSE inspectors, said: "Whatever way you cut this, there are insufficient inspectors to maintain current injury rates. What you need is a combination of more inspection to provide vital enforcement and to ensure that policy is developed to tackle this.' He called on the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) to rethink its proposed budget cuts of 15 per cent for the HSE from 2008 to 2011.
It seems that Labour have already started the cuts, with what can clearly be seem deaths are going to keep risen!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 25 August 2007 15:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd
And your point is ?

H&S is an "inconvenient truth", everybody agrees that you cannot have people being killed at work, but nobody wants the measures that are necessary to stop this.
The government doesn't want the employers always "on its back" because of "red-tape and over regulation"
The government has to maintain the public service payroll without actually having much work done.The employers do not want to spend money on providing the necessary routines and equipment.
The emplyees do not want to walk about like troops in a combat zone, wearing so much gear that DOING any work is akin to slavery.
Let's examine one case: A utilty worker. Digging a hole in the road to reach a cable junction. A large truck is needed to carry the warning signs, etc. The worker will be wearing: Protective footwear (no steel caps) , double thickness flameproof coveralls over street clothes, mandatory hi-viz waistcoat (or full weather reistance hi-viz), gloves (insulated), hardhat, hearing protection and eye protection. Is it any wonder that you see many not wearing anything ?
I shall refrain from mentioning the cost of consultants, just to say that you need to do the obvious.

(I promise not to mention that because the councils cannot prosecute such utility work for parking, they do it for obstruction....so they pay the company to install the lighting in the street and then claw it back by fines for obstruction !)
Admin  
#3 Posted : 25 August 2007 16:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By craig b hartley
hi john

And my point is ?

241 people died last year many avoidable, hopefully you'll never be in the position to tell a family there loved one died as result of doing their job!

now there were was alot of people calling for iosh to address the tory plan it's even on the front page of the site. but nothing was said about the cuts that are happening now, which are accountable for the rise in deaths and accidents.

you mention PPE is that not the last line of defence, n the fact you notice people not wearing it, should you not be doing something about it, rather than turning a blind eye.

another 15% cut to the HSE that'll certainly help enforcement.

If you had 241 people killed in your area, i'm sure you'd be bleating for more police on the streets. Strong enforcement is the only answer that'll get employers taking a notice and reacting accordingly.

Admin  
#4 Posted : 25 August 2007 19:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd
241.
Sounds a lot.
3200+.
Sounds a lot [more].
Work-related accidents V road traffic accidents.
Maybe I should do something about the lack of wearing of PPE ?
I should have 48 hours a day and a 10 day week ?
And still not enough time.
Yes, the 241 could probably have been avoided, if the people killed had paid attention to their own H&S, but many do not.
Maybe I should also insist that employers do a proper COSHH assessment, then a whole lot more a year could be saved....or maybe you forgot about the tens of thousands dying every year of industrial disease/s ?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 25 August 2007 22:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Safety-Dave
What is actually needed is more competent, practical and experienced Health & Safety People. These people need to be able to offer practicable solutions to the real issues that are found in the modern workplace.

Just look at a lot of the total garbage that is posted on this forum from so called competent people! Example the use of Harness’s when using MEWP’s or the need for the Electrical testing of double insulated tools like mobile phone chargers.

When I am saying about competent H&S people I mean ones who CAN, WILL and DO try to educate all their employees including Managers and Directors. I am not talking about the ones who want to hide behind their adviser job title just in case they have to appear in court.

Anyone who thinks that more enforcement will bring the current statistics on Fatalities and Ill Health down is living on another planet. As a Health & Safety Professional it is actually YOUR job to win other hearts and minds. If you cannot do this then get another job.

Yes it is true that the headline grabbing details about cut backs in the HSE do give the impression that Health & Safety is not a priority of Government but you must remember that this All Politicians are only interested in getting re-elected.

Also remember accidents and fatalities occur to all people regardless of their Political affiliation, sexual orientation, race colour or creed and despite there being numerous laws to try and prevent such occurrences.

The only people who seem to be advocating more enforcement and laws are those who do not run businesses.

If you look at any successful business they recognise that their most valuable asset is their people. If any Health & Safety person believes that a business will cause harm to their valuable assets, (fee earners for the organisation), should be sectioned under the Mental Health Act.

The bottom line is stop winging and get on with the job you are paid to do i.e. win hearts and minds or change jobs.

My view is that there is already far too much political interference in business
Admin  
#6 Posted : 26 August 2007 00:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By craig b hartley
hi safety john

alot you say i totally agree with you especially about trying to change behaviours, unfortunatly there is alot of employers who if they think that they can get away with not puting in place a health and safety person or system they will, and strong enforcement will be the only way to get these people to start being responsible.
with the increase in fatalities this year and with the possibility of a further increase next year mean that the battle to win hearts and minds with employees is being lost?
fortunatly i do work for a company who run an academy for training from directors all the way down in which the AFR is sitting at .2 for over 9000 employees,
my point is maybe it is the incompetent amongst us who are happy for enforcement to be cut.

john watch your not breaching the working time directive with all those hours youre doing :)

ps were the stockline directors thinking about their most valuable assets, i think not!!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 28 August 2007 09:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Hi Folks,

Safety Dave, afraid I disagree strongly with one of your comments; more enforcement is the answer, reducing H&S pressure will just let many businesses off the hook.

And John M; yes 241 deaths is less than 3,200, but bear in mind that maybe as many as 1,500 of those 3,200 were people at work at the time and you have 1,750 (ish) v 1,700; not a lot in it, really. Even at the lowest current estimate of road-related work deaths we still have a true at work fatality figure of nearer 1,000 rather than the 241 based on reported workplace deaths.

Then there's all the workplace contracted ill-health deaths to think about...

John
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.