Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Elliott Please can anyone advise I am looking for a scaffold inspectors course or similar, CITB have a two day course, has anyone been on this and can they give feedback, or does anyone have details of other training providers offering similar.
Many Thanks Mark
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Woodage Mark, Cant give any recommendations, but the Construction health and safety group run a scaffold inspection course at Chertsey in surrey. just search CHSG on the web.
Hope this helps. Alan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lee Mac I was on a one day scaffolding for supervisors course with the CITB- the course covered the basics, how to build, how not to build, what to look out for etc.etc.
One negative was the lack of handouts.
Lee
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By The toecap I did the CITB and i can confirm that there is a lack of handouts. But, it was quite informative and i enjoyed it. It amazing what you forget.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By db Be careful with these courses with the CITB - the one day course is an informative basic scaffold awareness course and does not (in the words of the CITB) train people to be competent to inspect scaffolding. The scaffolding inspection course is a 2 day course and this is what the HSE ask for (or equivalent with other providers, some of which are not 2 days but read the small print and ensure they are for inspection)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lee Mac The course that I did was generally for Site Manager/ Site H&S Manager but not for specifically for Scaffolding Co. Managers or Scaffolding Co. H&S Managers.
We looked at all types of scaffolding, their construction, in general terms only though,for example we didn't look at calculating wind bearing capacity and the associated controls etc.
The CITB did explain if you were looking to signing off scaffold for a scaffolding company you would need the 2 day course.
I guess it all depends on your job requirement.
Lee
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Garry Adams To the forum,
Do members of the Scaffolding fraternaty agree that a 2 day Scaffolding Inspection course is sufficient ??? to Commission Scaffolding Structures...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Ball No a 2 day course is not enough whatsoever , many a time i have had arguments with so called inspectors fresh of a course that have pulled out obvious items like brickguards missing etc and silly stuff , but that can never spot structural faults , i would say that a scaffold inspector should have done the 2 week basic scaffolders course as a minimum
For safety training and inspection courses / scaffolders courses we have always used Safety & Access in Nottingham as they seem to be well clued up
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By db The 2 day course is not for commissioning but for inspecting - it does what it says on the tin. It is for just the type of thing suggested - is it up to standard. Are there toe boards, guard rails, is there a single where there should be a double etc.
However, I've rarely come across anyone who does the inspections as they should be done - but I'm sure that would be the same if you insisted everyone should be scaffold trained which is of course impossible anyway. In the same way we dont expect an flt driver to be a mechanic
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Garry Adams Hi db,
I quite agree with you that,The inspection is to establish whether the Structure has been erected to Statutory requirements with no paitent defects and fit for purpose.
Who Commissions the Scaffold?, who tags the Structure?,Post Inspection.
In my poinion,A 2 day Scaffolding Inspection Course is no substitute for the esoteric teachings that a Scaffolding Erector has to absorb to enable him/her to achieve the level of competance demanded from a Proffecional.
My Granny had a humf on her back,however it did not make her a camel. Nor will a 2Day Scaffolding Inspection Course give the canditate that level of competancy to identify Paitant defects and recommend remedial or corrective action.
Kind regards, Garry
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By FJ I've "sent" people on the CITB course a number of times and got positive feedback from it. I've also used "Safety & Access" near Nottingham- similar course, similar costs, similar comments
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Garry Adams F.O.A. FJ,db
I have no wish to slag off the Inspection Course, they can only follow the CITB criteria.
The course may be of value, however it is limited to teaching the overt Statutory Breaches.
What about the covert concerns,i.e. Starutory Torque Values, Structural Stresses, the corrolation,permutation,configeration of a bespoke Special Structure in tube and fittings, ect,ect...
This subject is far to important, it should be given far more than the 2 days allocated.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Garry Adams F.A.O. Chris Ball,
Thanks for your comments,I agree that a more indepth course would be an advantage, indeed it would enhance the Scaffolding Industry.
It would be interesting to revamp the Inspection Course...what input would you include...
Regards, Garry...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Ball Well Garry , i would say that site experience would certainley be an advantage , most of these courses are in units on pre erected scaffolds with faults built in , ha its not for me to criticise , but the majority of guys that have the task of inspecting scaffolds on site use it as a one up over the scaffolders. We was on a site and the latest one which i must say i never heard of was that debris netting has to be fixedr to the external plain of the scaffold , never heard that one before and the job was condemmed over this , there seems to be overlap on some of these courses with certain issues such as tie spacings etc. We have had to provide this service in house for clients before and we usually send an advanced scaffolder to do the inspection , excellent way of making extra income from brickies moving boards etc , but at least our guys will carry out the work at the same time regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By ddraigice The issue here, reading between the lines is one of fear of being picked up by a non scaffolder over "silly" defects such as no toe boards.
To suggest that all inspections should be done by trained scaffolders is over the top. The accident history is predominantly from the scaffolders not erecting the thing properly in the first place or not tying in.
So Garry, what do you suggest? That all site managers or other employee of a company undergo basic scaffolding training? Would this pick up the faults already built in?
The problem with having the scaffolding company do the inspections are many - including the fact that they will not do it every day before work starts or every week without fail. They are also not likely to see defects that may have been built in by themselves.
HSE advocates this type of 2 day training as a minimum. Perhaps what the course should do is to ensure that the scaffold inspector knows his limits and can tell if there is a structural problem that needs a scaffolder - and it should already be company policy that if scaffold is up for a certain time period or after it has been subjected to adverse weather etc., it should be checked by a competent scaffolder.
The inspectors course is there for the "silly stuff" like single guard rails, toe boards etc which do cause many more accidents when they are missing and can land the contractor in hot water if they havent been picked up in an inspection.
These are exactly the things the inspection should be picking up - there is a requirement for these under WAH regs and are far from "silly". The stress values and torque settings and the like are for the scaffolders and not what is intended for day to day inspection.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Garry Adams Yo Chris,
Ye seams like every man and his dog has an opinion on the Quality of Scaffolding Structures...MMmmm a little knowledge is a dangerous thing eh.
Fraternal regards, Garry...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Garry Adams Hi ddraigice,
The issue is ...never rub an other mans rubbarb...I be in touch soon. Garry...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By db And yet you are the foremost authority on the legal aspect? pot, kettle black methinks!
It'd be a great boon for the scaffold industry to boost it's coffers, but I have to agree with dd.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Garry Adams F.A.O. db dd,
db, 36 years before the mast gives me the Authority on the Legal aspects.
Howmany years have you done ?.
dd, What is your disapline ?
Garry...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John A Wright Let's check the title of the thread again: Scaffold Inspection Courses. I read that as courses for safety consultants or safety reps to effectively and independently do the weekly scaffold inspections on building sites.
It's what the industry needs and CDM 2007 requires : somebody competent to do the inspection. Ignoring or not complying with the 'silly stuff' (read: the basic important stuff) is a major cause of accidents on building sites, and independent weekly inspections can save lives.
Not much wrong with a safety consultant acting as the safety rep for a small builder who might not trust scaffolders to do their own inspections. The basic things can be learned in a couple of days and experience is rapid after a few inspections conducted and consulting with the scaffolders.
Chris mentioned surprise that "debris netting has to be fixed to the external plain of the scaffold". Well, there are situations where I would demand that: if inspections indicated that debris IS LANDING on the ground outside of the scaffold coverage then it's clearly a good idea to fix netting, particularly where there's footpaths nearby, vehicles parked nearby, roads nearby etc etc
John W
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Garry Adams Hi Chris,
Yes , I would agree with your views regarding the debris netting. My take no it is, that the netting is there to contain the debris within the boarded lifts of the Scaffold,thus creation a barrier and limiting the likey- hood of a tort against site operatives and or members of the public. If a belt and braces approach is required to protect the person and or property then a Fan lift should be considered as a second line of defence.
Fraternal regards, Garry...P.S. who brought up the subject of "silly faults" ???.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.