Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 September 2007 11:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Matt Wardman
I dropped in in mid-August ago when the Radio 4 interview about Bonkers Conkers was on air.

I have continued the conversation on my blog, and there are now about a dozen articles - including professional contributions on PR and Health and Safety.

I hope you don't mind me posting a list with short excerpts below. The web address (follow the "Bonkers Conkers" link at the top) is:

www.mattwardman.com/blog/

I'll keep track of any responses on this thread.

There will be some more articles over the next fortnight, including on how blogs could be used in dealing with "H&S gone mad" stories.

There have been something like 35-40 responses so far.

Matt Wardman

Sept 02: Bonkers Attitude - Time to Take Responsibility? (2)

It’s always someone else’s fault isn’t it? Any media story about a daft claim leads to a flood of comments about how ridiculous it is, but how many of us would do exactly the same if it was us who slipped on something someone else had dropped? We all know that where there’s blame there’s a claim don’t we?

Aug 30: Sensible Safety - Dull, Dull, Dull? (0)

“Sensible”. It’s not a word that inspires the heart to beat faster is it? It reminds us of the shoes we had to wear to school and the boring kid in the class that our parents always wished we could be a bit more like. “That Rodney, he’s such a sensible boy”. My dictionary says it means “judicious, moderate and practical”. I think it just means dull, dull and dull. However on the next line it gives an alternative meaning – “aware, alive to (a thing or idea)”. Now that’s more like it.

Aug 30: Training PR practitioners in risk assessment (1)

As the general secretary of the Motor Industry Public Affairs Association (MIPAA), I develop training and workshops for our 450 members. One area that we have identified as key, especially in relation to organising launch events with journalists, is risk assessment.

Aug 28: Bonkers Compo - Myth Or Reality? (1)

Ask the man in the street – or at least the man in my office – what he thinks and he’ll tell you that compensation culture definitely exists. Ask the TUC and apparently it doesn’t. So who’s right?

Aug 28: PR perspective on Health & Safety (3)

Maybe you think that if only those PR people would do their job properly, there wouldn’t be all the media outrage about “health & safety” gone mad - and the public would have more respect for risk management.

Well, as a professional public relations consultant, I thought it would be interesting to borrow Matt’s blogging chair and provide the PR perspective.

Aug 28: Blogs which cover Health and Safety Questions: Dealing with Bonkers Conkers (0)

We have been covering the questions around “bonkers conkers” stories on this blog, here and here .

I put out a plea for some Health and Safety blogs to emerge. I have found a few options, but the coverage is currently woefully thin. Here are those I have found.

Aug 27: Off The Ropes, Onto The Safety Wire (0)

It feels a bit like one of those meetings where a group sits in a circle in some bleak church hall waiting for one of their number to begin. Finally someone braver than the rest stands up and says “Hi, my name is Not Important and I’m a health and safety professional.” So begins a week or so of ramblings from me based on nearly 20 years in the H&S profession.

Aug 21: Britblog Roundup #131 Audio Podcast (0)

This 5 minute podcast on Radio5 included a discussion on the Health and Safety stories on the Wardman Wire.

Aug 20: Britblog Roundup #131 (6)

One of the jobs of blogs is to help groups talk to each other who normally exist in separate worlds, and I’ve been causing trouble in the Health and Safety world.

On The Wardman Wire I’ve been looking at what Health and Safety Officers call “Bonkers Conkers” stories - an equivalent from the Health and Safety world of “EU outlaws bent banana” rumours.

Aug 17: Bonkers Conkers and Health and Safety: Response from the Institution of Occupational Health and Safety (5)

I have had a detailed response from the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health to my article “Do Health and Safety Professionals Get too Much of a Kicking?” I reproduce it full here.

Aug 15: Do Health and Safety Professionals Get too Much of a Kicking? (21)

Recently I have posted about how “health and safety” concerns lead to - in my view - too many urban trees being removed unnecessarily, as exemplified by this quote:

“The council says the trees are a trip hazard but as far as we can establish nobody has ever fallen over them.”

Admin  
#2 Posted : 03 September 2007 15:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton
Matt,

You've probably not been around this forum long enough to remember the thread dealing with the problem of what we in the profession should call ourselves...

Sitting around in a circle, in a church hall, you throw off your tweed jacket (with obligatory elbow patches) and reveal yourself in your inside-outside lingerie to be:--- Danger Man!

Its worth a look, if only for a brief giggle.

http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...iew&forum=1&thread=19957

Steve
Admin  
#3 Posted : 03 September 2007 17:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Matt Wardman
Thanks.

It strikes me that Danger MOUSE is a good analogy for the H&S Officer's public image.

Which one are you: Danger Mouse or Penfold?

Matt
Admin  
#4 Posted : 03 September 2007 17:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton
Probably thermoman - from the 'my hero' series (Ardal O Hanlon). Not just because I seem to be dealing with a lot of thermodynamic instability issues recently (Fires, explosions etc) but also because we in the profession are so often misunderstood.

From the BBC Website:- "Blessed with extraordinary powers he may be, but George (Thermoman) is ignorant of human life and has a baffling, off-centre view of things." (Ain't that the truth for all H&S people?)

"This makes him a poor match for Janet in the eyes of her overbearing mother (and put-upon father, Stanley) who would much rather she date her boss, the narcissistic Doctor Crispin." (Why are we H&S people generally made to feel feel unwelcome in 'polite' Society?)

"On George's side is Janet's neighbour Tyler, ....He likes George and knows he is Thermoman, but this is not a problem as nobody ever believes anything he says." (And the truth will out...).

Quite apt really.

Steve
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.