Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 September 2007 15:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rich T
He have an employee who is wishing to return to work with a low-level radioactive implant to treat a medical condition. His specialist is advising no contact with pregnant women, children, travelling on public transport or sleeping with (etc.) their partner (etc.)

He will be working in a general office environment (staffed mainly by women) with the usual problems of not knowing who actually is - may be, or may not know they are pregnant. There is also the prospect of his fellow workers taking the view of not wanting to work with him, and the prospect of latent claims at some point in the future, for a wide variety of illnesses alleged to stem from their "exposure" to radiation.

Now it would be easy to take a "knee jerk" reaction to this and temporarily suspend said worker until the radiation effects diminish (20 days or so). But has anyone any experience of either risk assessing or developing a SSOW for this situation?

Or would you just suspend him?

Long-shot, I know, but an interesting conundrum for a Tuesday afternoon and just bit out of the ordinary.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 September 2007 15:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Drew
I find it hard to believe that his doctors would allow him ouit of hospital let alone back at home or at work if there was any serious risk to any other person!

Has he provided any written advice from his medical practitioners??

If not then ask for it but if the business can sustain the loss of production from this person for a three week period then my advice would be suspend him on full pay if you are at all worried!
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 September 2007 16:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rich T
I'm led to believe it's fairly routine, although my thoughts were initially the same. Doing a web-search on "Radioactive seed implants (brachytherapy)" gives more details.

I'm just trying to reconcile the "avoid extended contact with people" and letting them into a working environment. With today's compensation culture, you can see what might happen with some of our more "imaginative" employees...

However - would it be "conkers bonkers" just just suspend him over - what is in all probability - a very small risk?

As a side issue, I'm also wondering if the IRR regs would apply, with regard to our other employees, if we allowed him into work????
Admin  
#4 Posted : 04 September 2007 16:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Rich

Is the source a gamma emitter? If not, the external hazard is surely limited (if a beta emitter) or non-existent (if an alpha emitter).

Paul
Admin  
#5 Posted : 04 September 2007 16:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GLOW-WORM
Hi Rich T

I may be able to help if you have some more details on the treatment that your employee has received. Please e-mail me direct.

Thanks
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.