Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 October 2007 21:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David
Could someone please clarify whether a fire drill is required within a block of flats that the residents own, but pay a service charge.
In a bed and breakfast or small hotel just setting the alarm off once a week is good enough, however, with 200 flats within a block, how can this be achieved.

Look forward with your comments.

Dave

Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 October 2007 22:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Randall
Hi David,

there is no requirement for residential premises to have a fire drill.

I would not agree with your assertion that "In a bed and breakfast or small hotel just setting the alarm off once a week is good enough..." There's a whole lot more to a fire drill than that and I think you are confusing it with the weekly audibility test.

A fire drill is a simulated evacuation carried out to test the effectiveness of the response to an actual fire situation and to give employees practice in what to do in the event of fire. Fire drills are usually done at least annually, or in most cases these days every six months.


Regards,

Bob R
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 October 2007 19:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David
Hello Bob

Rob, the building is owned by an organisation, these are the responsible persons for the building, even though the flats have been purchased. Tests of call points are completed every week, so surely a fire drill is required.
Look forward to your comments.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 23 October 2007 19:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David
Hello

I seemed to get an answer from Bob, unfortunately not the answer i was expecting. Do buildings owned by an organisation with flats that have been purchased and pay a service charge need to undertake a fire drill.
There is no conciege on site.

Dave
Admin  
#5 Posted : 23 October 2007 19:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Randall
Hi Dave,

as I said in my previous reply the answer is no because all of the flats are individual private dwellings regardless of whether they are owned by an organisation or owner occupied.

Regards,

Bob R
Admin  
#6 Posted : 23 October 2007 20:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
OK. No obligation, private flats and so on. But let's talk "best practice".

In a factory I go for two drills a year, one with advance warning, one without.

David, in your situation, as I have understood it, I would still go for two-a-year (to be cancelled if raining) but make it a fun event with coffee, balloons and biscuits for every "survivor"

Apart from the roll-call (which in 30 years I have rarely managed at 100%)(even with electronic aids) the most important action is that of "sweeps" who check every room. (they may need pass keys) some people, example ; ex-colonels, ex-majors, ex-head mistresses may decide not to disturb themselves.

The fire brigade can then be informed of where "lost" people could be found and could concentrate their attentions on those areas.

They may be private flats but I would maintain that it is the responsibility of the proprietor to ensure that everyone has evacuated or been accounted for.

Merv (soon to be an AOP and realising just how pig-headed some of them can be)(Corrie ain't finished yet. Gimme 10 minutes)
Admin  
#7 Posted : 23 October 2007 22:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Randall
Merv,

You say

"They may be private flats but I would maintain that it is the responsibility of the proprietor to ensure that everyone has evacuated or been accounted for."

The proprietor is most definitely not responsible either legally or ethically. they are private dwellings.

The whole thing is a logistical nightmare. Are the residents in or out? Are they perhaps just not aswering the door? Do they want to take part in a drill, after all they are under no obligation and some would probably even ignore the fire alarm. How many people live in each flat? Do they have any visitors?

You yourself admit that you have never achieved a 100% roll call (a useless system in my view anyway) but how would you propose to "sweep" private dwellings?

Regards,

Bob R
Admin  
#8 Posted : 23 October 2007 22:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
The construction of private dwellings is different to that of commercial premises such as offices. Generally the level of fire separation between residential units, usually one hour minimum, means that if there is a fire in one dwelling it is unlikely to spread to adjacent dwellings. Therefore there is no need to evacuate adjacent dwellings, at least in the early stages. The fire service will decide upon their arrival if it is necessary to evacuate other dwellings.

It is just not realistic to evacuate residential flats. It would be an absolute nightmare to manage.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 24 October 2007 09:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister
Shaun appears to be spot on in my view.

My mother lives in a block of flats with 18 individual dwellings on 4 floors. Whilst she is not the oldest she is one of the more frail residents and although she is still able to live on her own she needs assistance with some aspects of living. She is fully alert but rather deaf and slow-moving.

I believe that any attempt to arrange a fire drill for this block of flats is pointless and probably dangerous too.

There is no alarm system in place, other then individual residents own standalone arrangements.

There have been large numbers of fires in blocks of flats/apartments and sadly large numbers of fatalities. How many fatalities or casualties have occurred in adjacent dwellings? I don't know the answer but I suspect that it is a very low number, thanks to standards of building specification and construction, separation and the emergency services.

As a final point, I worry very much about other residents using wedges to prop open landing doors and have previously thrown the offending things in the dustbin. My mother knows better now - I've been very assertive in my education and she has taken up the challenge to remove this habit from the residents.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 24 October 2007 09:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer
When carrying out FRA's of the common areas of residential blocks {as it is regarded as a workplace}. Part of my advice is to have a emergency plan which is comunicated with the fire services.

I say this because from past experience I have had Essex Fire Services saying 'everyone out' policy. Then East Sussex Fire Services saying 'stay put' policy.

Best practice is to have an emergency plan that is communicated to all residents {notice boards, memo's, residents meetings}. This can then be communicated to the fire service.

Obviously you get the less able persons who are safer to stay in flats and wait for the fire service to assess if a total evac. is required.

If you have willing residents that will go along with the fire drill process then happy days. Rather try than not try.

But it is a mine field and not practical in most cases.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 24 October 2007 10:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer
Surely david bannister the FRA would have advised a Grade 2 LD2 FIRE SYSTEM IF THE PROPERTY IS NOT BUILT IN ACCORDANCE TO THE BUILDING REGS.?
Installing battery operated smoke detectors on landings as a temporary measure {having a system of checks being recorded}.

Wouldn't the less able persons be more at ease if they knew an emergency plan was in place and the fire services knew about it.
Even though fire may stay within that private dwelling normal human behaviour is to try and escape and not stay put.

In my experience some of the flat front doors are in such a state that smoke would be the main hazard if the staircases are not protected.....again all info that should come out in the FRA.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 24 October 2007 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister
I am seeking clarification on whether a fire risk assessment is required for a block of flats, all privately owned, common areas owned jointly by the residents. Any work done is domestic: cleaner, decorating etc.

If it is a requirement, who is the duty holder? Who has authority to effect change?
Admin  
#13 Posted : 24 October 2007 11:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister
I know my last post is repeat of the original posting but now I'm confused.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 24 October 2007 12:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer
Common areas of all residents blocks require a fire risk assessement - as they are regarded as 'workplaces'.

I take it your residents took over responsibility from the Landlords and have set up their own company to look after the block??

Then their committee's should have Directors/Company Secretary's - who will be responsible for a FRA to take place.

In some cases they have done it them selves {The FRA that is} .

I would not advise this and would get someone in. The cost would not be great at all and can be taken from the service charge.

The competent Consultant could then guide them through any required actions .
Admin  
#15 Posted : 26 October 2007 22:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Duff
The Fire Safety Order does cover common areas of residential blocks but not the individual dwellings.

As there is no requirement for an evacuation drill for the dwellings arranging such a drill could have serious implications. The responsible person may make themselves liable for any injury caused by the drill. They may also leave themselves liable for financial losses (imagine the security risk of all those unattended dwellings!).

Develop an emergency plan, discuss it with your Fire & Rescue Service and issue copies to all residents.

Residents may not have the physical or mental capabilities to undertake such an exercise and you have neither the ability or right to make such assessments.

Introducing hazards that were not there can lead to serious legal and financial implications. Morally - a mans home is his castle and where he goes to get away from people controlling his life!!!

Duffer
Admin  
#16 Posted : 27 October 2007 16:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Dear All,

A couple of points; the RR(FS)O does not apply to the common parts of blocks of flats because they are a workplace but because the RR(FS)O applies to all premises except domestic premises & sea going ships.

Regarding fire drills etc; this depends upon the degree of control. Where there is no control, there no requirement for drills.

Regarding evacuation; in modern premises the best evacuation policy is to stay put, unless you are in the flat on fire. In properties where there is inadequate fire separation, such as conversions from older properties, then occupants should get out. This means that there must be an linked FD2 system in the premises to give early warning.

In special needs the HSW Act also applies and a housing provider that provides on-site staff to look after persons with mental illnesses or who have educational needs has a duty to ensure the H&S of persons affected by its undertaking, i.e. the persons in its care.

Regards Adrian
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.