Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John J
Most of my chemical plant areas use hard hats but one plant is arguing for the use of bump caps.
Is there any standard that says hard hats should be used?
Is it the norm to wear hard hats in the chemical industry?
Any guidance appreciated,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Hard hats are the norme on chemical plants. Mainly because with all the pipes and racks and valves that are higher than head height it is quite likely that someone will drop a spanner on you.
Oddly enough, it seems that managers experience a higher frequency of such dropped spanners. Why would that be ?
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By garyh
I worked for 20 years in the chemical industry, hard hats were the norm. There are different British standards for both types of hats.
"Of course" hard hats like all PPE should come from risk assessment, hierarchy of control, be the last resort and so on.
In other words, do a risk assessment, checking the risk re the protection offered in both cases.
I would approach a safety equipment supplier and ask their friendly rep to advise for free on helmet standards applicable to your risks. Job done!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brando
Hard hats are for protection ( mainly ) against dropped objects.
Bump caps are for minor knock and bumps - the protection factor is lot lower.
I spent some years in a chemical plant and it was always hard hats.
Brando
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Larry Shannon
I have has similar requests and its back to the BS standard
hard hats- from falling objects
other ( bump caps) from knocks and minor bangs)
We looked at bump caps but there cloth make up and ventilation holes came up as issues in
cGMP areas and production general areas.
Purely logistics of one type of hat for all rather than bump in low risk and hard hat else where.
( we are Pharma site)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ian D.
Hi John
Back to risk assessment Im afraid. I was the safety manager across two chemical sites and did the assessment and introduced the bump cap option. What are the man risks? As Merv pointed out bumping into low pipework, valves etc. The ideal situation for Bump caps. Contamination is an issue, but there again there number or leaks should be minimal so that chance of contamination is low.
I had several visits from the HSE (being top tier COMAH site) and they never raise the issue of bump caps.
They went down well with the guys, just watch for the smart-alec taking out the inner protection, but you can spot this a mile away
Regards
Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Konstanty Budkiewicz
Hi JJ,
I work in pharma eng environment, largely outside GMP areas. As previous repondants indicate, PPE should be based upon risk assessment rather than "standard approach". In brief I support the following heirachy as astarting point for risk assessment:
Hard hats with peaks - within designated construction areas (risk of falling objects in particular).
Hard hats without peaks - when working at height (need to look upwards and risk of falling objects etc)
Bump caps - within assessed restricted space areas (minor burns, blows, cuts and grazes).
No head protection - in unobstructed plant rooms and low risk areas(and in absence of overhead work)
With regard to falling objects - method statements should identify the extent of the foreseeable fall zone as part of the job plan.
We should not rely on PPE to protect us from poor planning and the absence of 100mm kick plates above work areas: these need to be addressed in their own right as a root cause of said falling objects.
Kon CMIOSH
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John J
Thanks to all who contributed.
The trouble with the risk assessment is that 90% + of areas probably wouldn't need a hard hat. The problem is due to the size of the plant. It's is likely to lead to a situation where somebody will 'nip in' rather than go back and get their gear. I would really be setting somebody up to fail if we didn't make it mandatory for all plant areas..
Contamination is an issue with any cloth coverings on bump caps and this route would lead to us issuing two types of headwear.
My gut feeling was that it was the norm in chemical plants to wear hard hats and the risk assessments telling me that but it would be good to have the weight of a standard to confirm this.
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
John,
I doubt there will be any kind of official standard. "Best practice" is all there is.
Your risk assessment will show plant areas which include a risk of a dropped or falling object striking someone.
If you don't want to go 100% HH then those areas that do have the risk should be clearly indicated and the rule enforced.
Bump caps are probably ok if there is no overhead risk. And you can get them without cloth covering.
Kick-boards on scaffolding/platforms are always a good idea, but things still get dropped.
Merv
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.