Rank: Guest
|
Posted By andyp Hi,
Can anyone help with regards to the practice of 'daisy chaining' multiple electrical extension leads off a single electrical socket? Any specific regulations etc.
I am of the opinion that this is a bad practice that should be avoided where possible, to reduce the risk of electrical fires due to overheating of electrical cable.
However, the recently appointed electrical maintenance tech believes this practice is OK & does not pose any additional risk as all extension leads are appropriately fused.
Any thoughts & comments would be appreciated.
Many Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Johno As far as I am concerned, when I see a photo of a 4 gang extension lead with 4 plugs in it and a caption "overloaded sockets" I get rather miffed.
Daisychaining extension leads may be an issue if the length exceeds 15M. When the length is greater than 15M, a RCD must be incorporated into the circuit, either in the D/B, a RCD socket or a RCD plug.
The issues with long extension leads, is not one of overloading but one of increased potential for damage, poor connections, trip hazards and things being spilt into them.
A lead that is heavily loaded >2Kw can have issues with cheap plugs, sockets or just worn sockets. If a plug works lose it can overheat and the fuse will not operate.
If this is an office, you can reduce the hazard by ensuring that they are kept as short as possible, using good quality ones with 1.25mm cable and possibly reducing the plugtop fuse to a 5A or 7A. This will also stop people plugging heaters into them. Remember the 15M rule.
If this is a factory, then RCD sockets or ceeform sockets could be a possibility.
Of course, sufficient sockets in the first place is always best.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By andyp Many thanks for your response on this. The 15m rule is something i shall bear in mind when looking into this issue further.
However, the daisy chaining of extension leads is more than just filling the extension lead with 4 plugs; which i appreciate is not overloading but merely doing what they are designed to do.
In some instances there are 4, 5 or 6 extension leads plugged into each other in a 'series' fashion; all with numerous appliances running off them and all powered off a single wall socket.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Konstanty Budkiewicz Andyp,
Previous comments have indicated how to control the immediate situation.
If you own the premises may I suggest that "daisy-chaining" indicates that you have gone through an uncontrolled change to your business plan. Your inferred background concern is the management-of-change. I have previously seen this handled as follows: Change in operation - temp elect fix using extension leads. Only authorised layouts and designs sponsored by your technician being permitted. Register all such designs and make them subject to maintenance and periodic (3-monthly) review. Long-term changes can then be added to your infrastructure plan where power redistribution needs to be installed in accordance with IEE regulations. If you rent the premises, then your monitoring system needs to be robust.
As an aside, as the weather grows colder and wetter, I suggest that portable electric heaters and kettles are treated in a similar manner for safety, operational and cost reasons.
Kon CMIOSH
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman A maximum of eight (8) plugs/sockets per ring-main fused 15 amp circuit is allowed.
This includes wall-mounted sockets and extension leads.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Johno It would depend on the loading. If it is computers, phones etc I would say it was OK if not desirable.
If you have heavy loads such as washing machines, hoovers, heaters kettles connected, even one, I would agree that it is not especially safe.
With that many, I would probably ensure that the leads are tested and replace the plugtop fuse with a 5 or 7A. The fact that you need so many extension leads may indicate that the fixed electrical installation is rather old. If it is, the main concern from my experience would be the socket on the wall.
Has your fixed wiring had a periodic inspection report made on it?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By andyp Johno,
the fixed mainframe wiring has had a periodic inspection report completed in recent months. A number of issues were identified which are in the process of being addressed.
The current problem with daisy chaining extension leads stems from the current shortage of power availability throughout the premises due to the expansion of the business, equipment required etc. The overall power provided to the premises is in intended to be upgraded in the future.
There are no heavy appliances running off the extension leads at present.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Johno Merv, where did you get this information? It isnt in BS7671?
That statement is part of the French wiring regulations.
Our ring circuits are 30 or 32A and can serve a floor area of 100m2.
Our 30/32A radial circuits can serve a floor area of 75m2
Our 15/20A radial circuits can serve an area of 50m2.
All of these circuits can have an unlimited number of socket outlets.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By andrew morris I discourage the use of these in my organisation as they are a temporary measure. They should be used to temporarily aleviate plug congestion - one used permanently under a desk isn't a major issue. But several coming out of another I think is inappropriate.
I've convinced people to have fixed systems installed on the basis that electrical extension leads have to be maintained just as any other part of a system (in our case we PAT test)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Geoff Ferneyhough What about basic electrical safety? Each Extension cable plug has a 13Amp fuse in it, which means that the four plugs plugged into the lead can total up to a maximum 13Amps.
If you plug more than one extension lead into another the maximun current rating of the appliances cannot exceed the initial 13Amps. With 3 or 4 leads daisychained you would easily exceed the 13Amp maximum and create a fire risk.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Johno I agree that they are undesirable, they just arent the great fire risk that everyone assumes and you cant overload them unless someone has bypassed the fuse.
If an office has hundreds of them due to lack of sockets and there are no issues with blown fuses or tripped breakers then it should be reasonably simple for an electrician to add additional sockets in the vacinity of an existing and this shouldnt be unreasonably expensive.
It is worth mentioning that a double socket is only rated at 13A combined. This means that you cant plug 2 3Kw heaters in, one in each socket. Not many people realise this and is a common cause of damaged/overheated sockets.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Johno Geoff, what would happen if you ran 20 amps through a 13A fuse?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter The answer to Johno's question is that the fuse will probbly get warm, unless one of the appliances has a considerable inrush current.
Andyp - I'd take a much harder line on this (in fact I'd confiscate the lot). Time for some training and awareness perhaps.The risks of this unofficial circuit growing out of control are real, as are the tripping hazards, cables being damaged in door jambs,being "mopped" by the cleaner, preventing fire doors closling properly etc. Your insurers wouldn't be happy with this, so why should you? Get a proper works order organised to provide fixed sockets where they're needed. Merv: 15 Amps? 30 surely?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By AdrianF Geoff, the 13amp fuse would hold
for up to 11hours as I believe
and herin lies the risk of fire
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By AdrianF Suggest you refer to Electricity at Work Regs 1989 reg4(1) "All systems shall at all times be of such construction as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, danger"
clearly such a "system" does not
reg4(2) "Any equipment provided under these Regulations for the purpose of protecting persons at work on or near electrical equipment shall be suitable for the use for which it is provided, be maintained in a condition suitable for that use, and be properly used."
The appears to be no protection to people here - fuses protect equipment not people - so Johno your 15m rule is absolute rubbish. You can get a lethal electrical shock from a cable two centimetres long just as easy as from a 30m length of cable
(in fact a 30m single uncoiled length of cable is probably safer as it doesn't contain as many joints as this "system", which increase resistance, which increases heat generation ....)
reg5 "No electrical equipment shall be put into use where its strength and capability may be exceeded in such a way as may give rise to danger"
in such situations it is easy to overload the capacity of the cable, the components within the plugs and sockets the fuses ..... thus susch a system clearly does not comply with this requirement either .....
The answer is correctly installed RCD protected sockets to meet the demand.
yawn
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Johnoo The fuse would hold for a period of time, dont have the characteristics to hand so cant check. It is designed to operate slowly to prevent nusiance operation.
The 13A fuse will blow before the cable reached a temperature which could start a fire. That is the whole idea of the british standard.
The 15M rule is not rubbish, check the code of practice for in service inspection and testing of portable electrical equipment. It is to ensure that the fuse in the plug will operate fast enough in the event of a fault.
RCDs provide 2 functions, one is to provide additional protection to the wiring the other is for personnel protection where the rating is 30ma or less.
There is still no requirement in BS7671 for RCDs on sockets unless they are likely to be used for equipment outdoors. They are also not apropriate for use on circuits for computers due to the earth leakage.
We have never seen a fire or overheating from properly used extension leads, daisychained or otherwise, we have seen fires from coiled leads.
The fuse will protect the cable always when chosen corectly. The fuse prevents the cable, plugs, sockets from being overloaded. If the fuse did not do this, why do we have it.
Electrical cables are designed to get warm, at least 60C some are rated at 90C and above.
Proper inspection and testing will protect people from electric shock better than a RCD. A RCD is more like PPE and you will still get a shock, just hopefully not a fatal one.
To make it clear, I am not stating that numerous extension leads daisychained is desirable but I am stating that they are not the big fire risk that everyone assumes. The risk of fire comes from poor maintenance resulting in damage to the cables, the same with any appliance.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 Given the difference of opinion laid out in this thread, it would be most helpful to know whether any of those posting are qualified in electrical engineering? I am not and now find myself totally confused. (my brain is mechanical you see) Clearly the use of extension leads is not best practice but is it ever a safe practice? That old chestnut, the real world is looming over us again. The use of extension leads is widespread especially in older buildings or where even the occupancy under lease may be in itself of a temporary nature. Should we be campaigning to have the production of extension leads banned or do they have a safe design use in a workplace somewhere near you? (tongue firmly placed in cheek)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter In addition to the above issues, the practice of daisy-chaining (and loading the circuit with computer/IT equipment) greatly increases the chance of a lethal shock at extranneous metal parts, under an earth fault condition. This due to the earth leakage currents generated by IT equipment. Daisy-chaining is not a "conkers bonkers" issue - it is downright dangerous.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.