Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Clare Gabriel Is there anyone else out there who is becoming totally jaded by the continual knocking - and it is continual - we get from everyone from Terry Wogan, to Clarkson to heads of police forces?
Picking up on Chas' theme I am sure I am not alone in feeling that when you meet people for the first time you have to JUSTIFY whatyou do for a living. Along the lines of 'yes but this is about preventing workplace deaths not spoiling people's fun'. I had imagined that the knocking of the safety profession would eventually run out of steam but sadly it appears to have gathered more momentum as more ludicrous stories hit the media and in fact many get regurgitated (fireman not allowed up ladders, conkers bonkers etc).
I fully appreciate the responses from our President, the HSC Commissioners etc but has the time not come for us to fight back? Unfortunately this is where my creative juices run dry, but surely we deserve some good press for the good work we do? There seems to be little recognition for us grass roots professionals who get up day after day, take all sorts of flack but still continue to keep people safe at work - unsung heroes if you like (well if I don't say it no-one else will!!!)
Not really looking for responses just wanted to record my jaded feelings!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brigham When I was in the military, we were often classed by civvies as "low life" and not fit to be a part of modern society. Then outwith Northern Ireland, the Falklands blew up and guess what, we were hero's once again. The Police take flak all the time for the job they do. The medical profession, Social Services etc. etc. In fact, all of the front line professions today, take flak now and again. We are flavour of the year, so what! If you are happy in the job you do and win a few arguments and converts along the way and achieve something worthwhile, what's the issue? The more, we as a profession retaliate to throwaway comments like we are doing, the more this brown stuff will stick! Rise above it and laugh when the comments are genuinely funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Raymond Rapp Clare, don't get too disheartened. When the chips are down the media are very quick to point out health and safety failures. The concept is akin to 'there is no news like bad news...'
I can live with myself and sleep at night - that is the more important to me.
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By srd Do you think we need to look partly at our own profession when apportioning blame?
After all, presumably there are some health and safety 'professionals' making these 'bonkers conkers' decisions.
Perhaps IOSH need to challenge those of us in the profession that are making such decisions, thereby tackling the problem at source and not just having to react every time a story appears in the media.
Surely we have more control over the actions of our professional members than we have over the media at large.
I'm not thinking of a witch hunt against members making such 'bonkers conkers' decisions, more looking at it as an opportunity to develop their understanding and knowledge of sensible risk assessment.
Stephen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan Clare I can appreciate very much how you feel 'jaded' yet, while I respect your choice about not wanting any 'responses', I'm sad that you apparently chose the option of merely echoing the behaviour of 'knockers' by simply 'knocking' them. If you want to move on from being 'jaded', may I respectfully suggest that you consider learning from the research of one of the world's leading researchers on ethical persuasion, Robert Cialdini. His books 'Influence Science and Practice' and 'Yes! 50 secrets from the science of persuasion' are clear summaries of experimental research directly relevant to the cynicism about which you complain, and illustrated with hundreds of practical examples. (Cialdini himself worked in advertising, selling and as a waiter in a smart Italian restaurant, in his early phase of research). They're available on Amazon. If you listen carefully to a summary of his talk at The Royal Society of Arts on 12 November at www.rsa.org.uk, there's a good chance you'll see other options to remaining 'jaded'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Darren (Daz) Fraser 'Taking the enjoyment out of the job' - not at all, if anything I look upon these types of stories as a new challenge.
When asked what I do for a living, I answer in all honesty "HS&E officer AKA Danger man", that normal provokes a response in one of 2 directions - that must be interesting, tell me more (the more informed individual) or that must be really boring (the slightly less informed individual). My response to the second one is what do you do for a living - and reply to them the same as they stated.
I am proud to be a member (albeit a junior one) of this profession, and wherever possible will try to re-educate and enhance accordingly.
Hopefully one day I will become a CMIOSH (long way to go yet, waiting for company to agree to sponsor NVQ4).
Personally I think that if the profession became regulated that would help to remove some of the less suitable elements that I have come across in the past, and yess I do listen to what they say before I start to ask the difficult questions.
So Clare, do not let them drag you down, just keep plugging away and know that you are not alone (although it may seem it at times).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Youel
In my opinion [x-sapper [9 para - 1968]] its a very recent situation; and positioned in a very small section of society; where squaddies are thought of as anything but the lowest of the low - it is still the situation that our lads have the poorest kit & conditions.
Unfortunately H&S is going the same way and worse as the squaddies; when there is little if any proof that adequate management costs £ and all all H&S is is adequate management!
Fight on regardless as a soldier would say or get out of the game
H&S advisers don't die they just fade away
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Duell My usual response to people dragging out the "conkers bonkers" etc, is "Yes, but that decision wasn't made by a health and safety professional" - if they're interested enough to ask what I mean by that, I explain about "suitable and sufficient", "reasonably practicable" etc, and point out that the way to get rid of all the stupid over-the-top "Elfin Safety" stuff is MORE people who understand H&S, not fewer.
Converting the world, one person at a time, takes time (about twenty million years, I think), but it's better than nothing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ghaam Terry .... who?
Clarkson wears a suit jacket with jeans with a Pink Shirt and thinks he's cool!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jim Walker I do the same a Paul Duell.
If we all do this as individuals and IOSH & Rospa & HSE then the message will get home eventually.
Its a fact of life that most people find H&S a boring subject.
Don't worry about it too much; just little by little help to raise the standards we aspire to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Bannister I think it's the latest media game played by lazy journalists.
Now that politicians are boring (or hide it too well), estate agents are passé, Trade Unions have all but vanished, we appear to be the fashionable ones to knock.
Enjoy the limelight while it lasts. This is our Andy Warhol moment!
Use every opportunity to tell people what a good job we do, how bad the good old days really were and how each of us is motivated to improve the working conditions of our colleagues so they may die of old age, with all their bits intact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MT I just tell people that I get very angry when I hear about inexperienced and clearly unqualified people having made very bad decisions through ignorance and an inability to interpret and apply the law correctly.
There is nothing wrong per se with the health and safety laws and regulations we have in place, and when you have a look at most of the "bonkers conkers" type stories in the red tops, if you have half an ounce of common sense, you will know that 99.9% of the time, there is no regulation which backs up the poor decision which was made.
I just explain this to people and if they're still not convinced, ask them if they'd prefer if it with no regulation, which means their other half might not return home alive from work some day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Duell MT's response reminds me of a union H&S rep I used to work with:
"John, why do you care so much about Health and Safety?"
"Because my brother was killed in a workplace accident".
Thank God most of us don't have that kind of motivation, but he certainly always did a fine job on hearts and minds after that introduction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Shillabeer I was just thinking about this question following a comment by several friends last night. I chose to keep my mouth shut because they believe everyting in the press as right and just from H&S to imegrants being nothing but a drain on the country, both of which are utter rubbish. But, it is from thier small outlook and scope of experience and lack of understanding. As for the media it is another story easily accepted by those who are short of the true facts. As for losing heart about safety and health, just remember the safety manager is best not noticed or called upon to act provided the people who he or she is there to help protect go home safe and well that is more rewarding than being involved in investigations as to why someone was seriously injured or even killed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter Clare
Nil illegitime carborundum!
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Colin Reeves I find it frustrating when an insurance company advises a client that they will not cover an event as the financial risk to them is perceived as being too great. This seems to translate automatically into the media as the event has banned on the grounds of "elfan safety".
It is a pity that neither the HSE nor IOSH major on this misapplication of elfan safety when the reason is purely financial.
Colin
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Breeze Colin, You obviously weren't listening to Today on Radio 4 at 8:45 this morning. I heared a very spirited defence on the issue from the HSE. You can listen again here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GT Clare, Please smile .......you are prettier when smiling.
It isn't all bad.
We need to be thick skinned, to carry the clip board and leather patches.
We could look at it another away.
Hypothetically, we can imagine what life would be like if tomorrow morning all hell finned saif tea people said enuff!!
We all resigned from our jobs...whooooosh gone
A bit like policemen walking out and letting the general public look after it.
What do you think the effects of 32,000 workers changing jobs over night would have on industry and commerce??
Would there be any panic!!
Would there be concern?
Would you be considered uncaring ??
No more flak ......no conkers bonkers.......do you think it would cause a stir or would the wheels of industry Clarksons and Wagons would be happy to work in studios where electricity runs wild around their backside without earthing ??? Perhaps they would, but their employers are more responsible.
I don't think it is an option.............as expressed by others on the forum we take the knocks and get off the floor to be knocked down again. An easy knock down maybe, but never knocked out. Its the fight we have to win,not every round.
We are here to support you, so please don't take it to personaly be proud to be doing something which benefits the work force of this country.
Ok! OK! I will get off the box
GT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Allen If the question is about enjoyment in the job then it clearly still exists. However if it is “do I get despondent sometimes due to the continual uninformed flak that comes from the press” then the answer has to be yes. There does seem to have been an awful lot of it over the last few weeks to the extent that I haven’t bothered to read the "H&S Taliban" thread at all.
Here are some observations/comments:
If you need an antidote to our profession’s news coverage just read Private Eye occasionally, especially the “Street of Shame” section. It makes you realise how thoroughly disreputable, hypocritical and inconsistent our so-called national press are.
If you ever read the press coverage of an event you’ve been personally involved in, its usually wrong. Just remind people from time to time that this fact applies to everything they read, see or hear in the media.
Geoffrey Podger and Lisa Fowlie can write all the letters to the press they like to put the record straight but because of their position they will never exert enough influence on the media and thus the general public. What we need is a popular personality to take up the cause of safety in the way that Michael Palin and Jenny Augiter have for sustainable transport. The BBC are about to make geology “sexy” – surely someone can do the same for our profession?
The government’s chief medical adviser is a doctor; its chief legal adviser is a lawyer. I saw on TV the other day that the government’s adviser on fire safety is a former fire brigade chief. Why is safety the only profession which is not represented by a qualified practising professional at chief adviser level? There’s no point in complaining about lack of qualified professional advice being applied at grass roots level when the problem goes all the way to the top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Clare Gabriel WOW!!!! 17 responses in such a short time. I love my job and am one of life's great enthusiasts as many of the delegates I have taught over 20 years will support BUT as many of you have identified it is a few who seem to feel the need to knock us that make the news and make it big!!!
Thank you so much - was having a bit of a low morning and now know we are - if ever I was in any doubt - in the Company of some good humoured true professionals - keep up the good work us all!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By mark linton
Sorry to make a slight tangent on this discussion, but it was my understanding that the conkers and goggles decision was not made by an unqualified or inexperienced H&S Officer, it wasn't made by anyone at all. The story as reported was b******s, total fantasy (apologies to moderators).
I believe it was investigated during the writing of the TUC report '10 myths' and whilst two schools had banned conkers as an unspecified number of pupils had severe nut allergies and the potential for death was deemed unacceptably high - and I, for one am not going to argue with that. The goggles element had come in when a teacher at another school had tried to use it as a tongue in cheek example to his / her pupils of how compensation culture had changed how certain activities are done and the press missed the point entirely.
I love my job - remember the difference you make day to day and ignore what the papers, publish and be damned is my view.
Journalist's (columnist's most of all) like an easy life like the rest of us, so when a deadline is approaching and they have no story they think 'what will fill some column inches 'Ah health and safety' - so make up or exaggerate a couple of stories or write what some guy told you in the pub the night before and 500 words later, hey presto another myth is created, job done (ever noticed that the majority of these stories have limited, if any, facts attached to them)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman My wife and I were out on a social do on Saturday. (boozing and booffing (eating). In that order)
When asked by an American what I did for a living I replied "I'm an expert on Danger ; Fires, explosions, industrial accidents and so on" Immediate respect and interest.
A few anecdotes and jokes later and we got totally boozled. Together.
Merv
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DP All professions get knocked - HR , Traffic Wardens the dreaded Estate Agents.
Look at yourself and the job you are doing and if? you are getting results and your place of work is safer because of your hard work then you'll do for me Clare for whats its worth.
DP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tom100 The problem you are up against, Clare, is that the profession attracts more than its fair share of jobsworths, nitpickers, bullies, and so on. It's unfortunate, but it is true. (I know because I have seen it first hand.) And while some of the silly stories that abound are apocryphal, they are only believable because they build on a foundation of authentic nonsense!
All you can do is get on with doing a sensible job, credit your fellow human beings with a little common sense, and make a point of challenging the idiots who give the profession a bad name at every opportunity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman Tom,
I slightly disagree. if we are doing our job right nothing happens. Nobody dies, nobody breaks a leg.
That does not make the newspapers.
Now, if we could find a way of telling the press that British industry had saved umpteen billions of pounds and preserved thousands of jobs because of H&S ?
Would that make the headlines ? I doubt it. It's a naff subject.
Clare, stick with it. It really is a worthwhile job. Naff maybe, but it can be a lot of fun.
Merv
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tom100 Good point Merv. Although I would say that that is all the more reason for clearing out the nonsense - there is nothing to counter balance it. Then at least it would be a case of no news is good news.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 Clare, it is the modern sickness. I watched a brief report this morning from the new St Pancras International Station. A triumph by any measure, a project on time and allegedly under budget; by all accounts a triumph of art and design (I haven't seen it in real life yet) and what does the reporter do?? He asks knocking questions about whether the money was well spent and whether it isn't just a huge great white elephant now that we have low cost air travel???!!! Imagine, for example, how the thousands who have worked hard to deliver this world class project felt about that? Real cutting edge, investigative journalism? Nah. Designed to generate a scoop for 24 hour news channel and nothing more. Probably.
As long as you are proud of your profession and can remind yourself now and again of the real difference you make every day, what else matters?
philistines are philistines. (lower case spelling intentional) Their interest will pass onto other things soon enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman Tom,
I slightly disagree. if we are doing our job right nothing happens. Nobody dies, nobody breaks a leg.
That does not make the newspapers.
Now, if we could find a way of telling the press that british industry had saved umpteen billions of pounds and preserved thousands of jobs because of H&S ?
Would that make the headlines ? I doubt it. It's a naf subject.
Clare, stick with it. It really is a worthwhile job.
Merv
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.