Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 19 November 2007 04:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Albert
Is it a legal requirement to switch off equipment like welding machines, generators etc. while fueling? What is the source for such a practice inside petrol stations?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 November 2007 09:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap
From a fire risk assessment point of view i would guess. e.g generators getting hot etc
Admin  
#3 Posted : 19 November 2007 09:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glen Coe
Hi,
Best practice would be to eliminate as many as possible sources of ignition, either through hot surfaces, static, naked flame or arc.

The real issue is spills and vapour clouds.

Diesel is comparatively safer due to its higher flash point and reluctance to burn with naked flame, but petrol is very volatile and can give off vapours at very low temps, if I recall the flash point for petrol is about minus 40 deg c (in a closed cup method for the experts)so in summer it can produce significant vapour clouds.

Cheers
GC
Admin  
#4 Posted : 19 November 2007 11:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Albert
Thanks for the replies. Again, is it a statutory requirement?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 November 2007 12:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap
Yes, a fire risk assessment is part of the Regulatory Reform fire safety order 2005. And a risk assessment is a legal requirement under the MHSW regs 1999 also to protect your employees
Admin  
#6 Posted : 19 November 2007 13:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48
I wonder what the "user instructions" say for this type of plant?
Switch off, turn off engine before re-fuelling, perhaps??
Admin  
#7 Posted : 23 November 2007 14:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julian Meer (at Work)
I knew of an otherwise very good graduate mechanical engineer whom took the short-cut of re-filling the fuel tank to a small rotary engine whist it was running. He splashed diesel onto the hot engine and instantaneously a flash fire occurred burning his bare skin sufficient to hospitalise him. He was lone working at the time and if his clothes had caught he would be dead. This man was experienced with flammable fluids.

On investigation with a themrographic camera I found that some parts of the engine casing exceeded the autoignition temperature of the diesel and so no naked flame or vapour cloud scenario was necessary. Admittedly it was an old engine. When the engine was switched off the offending parts decreased rapidly in temperature to a safe limit.

Unless it can be proved that the equipment can't do this then a wiseman would follow Pete48's advice as above.

Not everything that can kill a man has to be in statute or an ACOP. It is also a matter of applied thinking and considering the designer's viewpoint, etc (I won't add common sense). That being said it may now become apparent that a mechanical interlock is exists on most cars so that the engine can not be run whilst refuelling, i.e., the ignition key also fits the petrol cap (yes, I know you can cheat with the spare and there are exceptions). Why do most cars have the fuel tank away from the (hot) engine, even though it then involves engineering longer lines with joints and pumps?

When one uses flammable fluids in the open air then by the nature of the situation you have two sides of the fire triangle. You then only need the third, spark from running engine, super hot casing, etc. Therefore I would hope all users of such equipement would mimimise all sources of ignition unless it is their intention to actually create a fire!

Legally speaking, I would chance that switching off engines whilst refueling is compliant DSEAR's "so far is reasonabley practical" duties i.e. seconds v the loss of the rest of someone's life.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 25 November 2007 21:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
James,

At Retail Petrol filling Stations, the requirement to "switch off engines, no mobile phones" etc. are all requirements placed on the licensee (operator or owner) by the licensing authority (LA or Fire Authority)under legislation subsidiary to the HASAWA .The Kiosk Attendant should not authorise the pump until satisfied that it is safe, and similarly should maintain vigilance and isolate the pump at once if the situation changes. The day-to-day reality is of course entirely different.
No legal duty can be placed on M.O.P by the conditions of licence, a duty is owed to self and others at Common Law.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.