Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 November 2007 18:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MICK MEAD, CMIOSH
Scenario - a school planning to give every pupil a laptop. Clearly the pupils are not employees, and DSE assessments (lets face it, the equipment will be in "prolonged use") at the homes of hundreds of pupils is not going to work out. However, I think the school would have a duty of care here. I'm concerned about the ergonomic issues mainly, but also wary about electrical safety in terms of the power leads that are likely to be much-used.
what are the opinions of my colleagues out there? Would instructing the pupils in the safe ergonomic set-up of laptops be the best approach - including manual handling and personal security issues, or am I missing something?

You views would be greatly appreciated. I know the situation with employees but the pupil status is a new aspect for me.


Regards, Mick
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 November 2007 20:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By db
Same duty of care as employees. Same control measures etc.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 November 2007 05:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Suvid
Mick,

I totally agree with you. In fact I am of the opinion that ergonomic principles should be taught early in life. It helps to form the 'right' habits. Principle of allignments in the body and maintaining correct posture during work should be emphasised right at the school level.


Suvid
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 November 2007 08:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson
Any visual photos of RSI sufferers included in any training sessions would also reinforce the "take a rest" advice, and consequences of overuse - What about that same advice going out as a leaflet to the parents when the pupils are issued with the laptops ?

(Sniff, sniff !! - I had to PAY for my grammar school slide rule many years ago - lucky kids !!)
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 November 2007 10:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
In my view laptops are a real problem if used more than for minutes at a time; the only ergonomic way to use them is to have a proper keyboard attached (and preferably a monitor, workstation etc). However, they are often just put on a table (or bed!!) and people hunch over them to type.........
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 November 2007 10:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DRB
Are you guys serious???

Do you think that any teenager is going to take any notice of your ergonomic training?

Tell you what don't hand out the laptops, or pencils for that matter (they could hurt themselves with the sharp points).

Here's a school trying to implement an excellent initiative and you lot are standing in their way with bonkers conkers arguments.

And before you try to shoot me down in flames I am CMIOSH (15 years experience), a school governor, parent and lawyer!!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 21 November 2007 10:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
Great initiative except that laptops are a nightmare in terms of ergonomics - what is wrong with a desktop, using data sticks to carry the data around?
Admin  
#8 Posted : 21 November 2007 10:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GARRY WIZZ
Well said,

hand them out, get real, this is not dangerous and they will not die from a PC.

The only check that will be needed is to ensure electrical safety. If they are still in the packaging then I would not bother with that.

As for teaching H&S in school.Poor and impractical idea.

Garry
Admin  
#9 Posted : 21 November 2007 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Without wishing to rub 'salt into the wound' I thought my eyes were deceiving me with this thread. Thank God for DRB's intervention.

Safety practitioners are supposed to consider real and significant risks!

Regards

Ray

Admin  
#10 Posted : 21 November 2007 10:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker
I agree there's not much you can do and benefits outweigh any risk.

I'd still advise them ( as I do my work colleagues) to get a mouse & full keyboard. I got a keyboard from Tesco the other month for a fiver.

Interesting no one has commented on the poor little devils having yet something else to lug around and the damage its doing to their backs.

Ref Slide rules, I saved up for months for mine: showed it to my sons (both graduates) the other week, they fell about laughing!

Much to my surprise I can still use it. I can't remember much about what happened yesterday, but 40 years ago is still fresh in my mind ;-)))
Admin  
#11 Posted : 21 November 2007 10:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philby'
Excellent...a polarisation of views, my favourite:

speaking as a reasonable person, (sometimes), I have to agree with both points of view...we are definitely in danger of blowing this all out of proportion, by denying a very useful learning tool, by either removing the provision or putting in excessive controls and frankly boring training....

HOWEVER

....my daughter complains of having a bad back, a cricked neck and is exhibiting, what she describes as pins and needles in her right hand and fingers. She has her own kids laptop and a nintendo thingy.

Shes eight and I cannot talk to her about posture, not bending over, not gripping the mouse or stylus too tight, not sitting too close to the screen, (and limit the time spent which elicits sulks and stomping around like a blond gorilla), not to turn her music down (except if its the Clash or NMA), not to run into the road, not cycling without her helmet.

I used to climb the local quarry, had my first cigarette, walk to town on the railway tracks, swing across branches above the reservoir etc etc when I was her age, I often think I am very lucky to still be here.

She has been taught to sit correctly at the PC at school and kind of understands what I do for a living...and laughs as I am currently wearing a carpal tunnel splint!

Yes advise of the dangers, but do it gently, let them get on with it, and then tell them I told you so! Its what we invariably do as a profession and inevitably do as parents

Philby'
Admin  
#12 Posted : 21 November 2007 12:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris G
in response to DRB's comments
HS&E professionals should adress significant risk. The fact that we have the DSE regs sugests to me that the UK (& persumably European) govenment are effectively mandating that DSE issues are significant, regardless of our own individual opinions.
The original thread asked about duty of care to stundents. My opinion on that is that the duty of care exisits to students. How that duty is then discharged is where we risk bonkers conkers.
Chris G
Admin  
#13 Posted : 21 November 2007 13:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch
Garry.

What's wrong with familiarising pupils with H&S issues at school?

Precisely, the principles as to why IOSH have produced the Wise up to Work package

http://www.wiseup2work.co.uk/

and why various organisations have produced guidance materials for children on the dangers of construction sites [and broader risks].

Given the number of injuries associated with DSE, [with the risks of PCs exacerbated in Laptop use, particularly if not equipped with keyboard etc] makes sense to me to inform these users.

NOT in my view a bonkers conkers situation. Laptops may not kill anyone, but do we really want to cause an "RSI" epidemic amongst the next generation of the workforce? [Bad enough that many of them are already slouching in front of video games rather than kicking a ball around]

Regards, Peter
Admin  
#14 Posted : 21 November 2007 13:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Taylor14
I AGREE WITH DRB
Admin  
#15 Posted : 21 November 2007 14:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs
My goodness !!

There are H&S people out there that think no harm can come from misuse of laptops? Are you winding us up?

Do you really think it is even close to 'conkers bonkers' to try and educate a young user about posture, use, and electrical safety? Amazing.

I can only presume you have never had to deal with WRULD or RSI. It can literally be disabling. People have had to change jobs because of it, after only a few years of poor setup. Imagine the school kid after five years - they may not be able to get a job which relies on their use of a keyboard!

A 240v-12v transformer carried about in a satchel/school bag, draped across the bedroom / dining room table ... can't you foresee some damage to the cable?

Nowhere did Mick suggest denying the project the go-ahead, he simply asked what the school needed to do.

Well, the Regs say assess; inform; train; monitor. Do that, in a sensible way and you will be doing them a good service.

As for kids not listening, it's a school for goodness sake - my hope is that they know how to get kids to listen.

DRB, you mention 15 years, CMIOSH, and say that people are "standing in the way" by suggesting reasonable care to young people yet to even start their working life. As a lawyer do you not think that the school owes a duty of care? Would you like to defend the personal injury case brought in two years time? (A real 'class action'). What line would you take? "The kids wouldn't have listened even if I did try to tell them how to use it safely"?

Hmmm....
Admin  
#16 Posted : 21 November 2007 14:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
Trolls aside, this thread (and a few others) demonstrates that we are a profession in crisis! We seem to have a knee-jerk faction of over-reaction who are so scared of being labelled as "conkers bonkers" that they have abandoned any attempt at applying a sensible approach to managing risks!
All that said, why laptops? They certainly won't stand up to the rigours of being carried to and from school, they are more expensive than desktop PCs, and would be a prime target for muggings.
Changing times indeed!
"Jenkins, where is your homework?"
"Please Sir, the dog ate my laptop!"
Admin  
#17 Posted : 21 November 2007 14:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AHS
Current civil case law tends to preclude members of the Public from the Safety regulations even though Sec 3 of HSWA includes visitors etc.

A very arbitrary state of affairs.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 21 November 2007 15:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek J Golding
More significant might be the risk assessment as regards being mugged in transit. I don't doubt the requirement to warn laptops users of the downsides, as put in some of the responses above, but around some areas muggers consider their economics above ergonomics. The idea of PCs and USB sticks is much more sustainable, why bring up another generation to carry the latest "filofax" around with them when a stick and access is probably less onerous and certainly less physically demanding.

Question: Why does my 15 y.o. grandson never seem to have to carry any books, bags etc. and yet my 7 y.o. granddaughter has a bag of books to lug about? No, he seems to still get the grades and has a spotless attendance record so, he's not bunking off! (but you thought it too didn't you?) However, like them all, he has an inate ability with bluetooth so his phone MMC doubles for everything, except his girlfriend.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 21 November 2007 15:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Does the fact that these laptops have been "gifted" alter in any way the legal obligations of the school?

The discussion, to my mind, has not yet dealt with that aspect of the question.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 21 November 2007 15:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julian Wilkinson
Surely a common sense and practical approach must be taken here; trusting the children with a laptop in itself is a good thing and encourages responsibility. The dangers associated with them is a different matter.

Some form of guidance needs to be given perhaps in the form of a booklet issued with each laptop explaining safe use of the said equipment and a sign off slip could be included which is then duly signed by the parent to say that they understand them.

If they are purely for home use ok but I would be concerned with the carrying of the laptop to and from school, not so much as manual handling but the security risks for the kids and school property, for instance:

Mugging (most probably by another school's kids)
Leaving them on a bus with their coats and lunch box
Loss of data stored on them
Damage through dropping them whilst running around or using them to whack someone else with.
Forgetting them and leaving them in a park as they played football on route to school

Who pays for the replacements?
Who's responsible for loss or damage?

One answer might be to leave the laptops at their home and give them memory sticks to carry to and from school. This way you can regulate the 'official' amount of time spent on the laptop for homework purposes and whilst at school they use a desktop machine.

Just my thoughts on how I might tackle this if it was me.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 21 November 2007 15:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AHS
Does the fact that these laptops have been "gifted" alter in any way the legal obligations of the school?

I dont think so as they are children and presumably have to use them. I think the tort of negligence based upon DSE regs could still be proven.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 21 November 2007 16:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GARRY WIZZ
Having considered the comments, reviewed my own knowledge.

If the laptops are brand new in the package, hand them out with no further action required.

No offence meant folks, but I considered your comments lacked substance, credibility or evidence to support any of the actions put forward.

Garry
Admin  
#23 Posted : 21 November 2007 16:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jon Vitta
If you were really going to tow the Health and Safety line you'd look at the hierarchy of controls!


How on earth could you prove injury was caused using the Laptop and not the playstation 3 upstairs?


Admin  
#24 Posted : 21 November 2007 16:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julian Wilkinson
Gary,

fine and I agree if they are just for personal use, treat them as a gift like they are, but I am under the assumption that they will be used for school purposes
Admin  
#25 Posted : 21 November 2007 17:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs
"How on earth could you prove injury was caused using the Laptop and not the playstation 3 upstairs?"

and

"hand them out with no further action required"

Mick - these comments seem to show a disregard for the well-being of the children and not a responsible professional's approach to the provision of equipment. I would counsel you to treat the pupils as I would treat anyone and provide them with the support they need to use the equipment safely.

There is no difference in the need of a pupil and the need of an employee is there?

Unless you count the fact that a young skeleton is probably even more susceptible to damage through poor posture than an adult ...

There is no difference in the need of a pupil's portable appliance and the portable appliance of an employee is there?

Unless of course you've ever seen a kid's approach to looking after cables and wires ...

I can't understand the stance of withholding information and training at all. This isn't an imaginary risk, this is a well documented and high impact risk leading to injuries every day of the year.

No offence Garry, but your review appears to be wrong to me.

Tabs,
BSc(hons) Occ Health & Safety, CMIOSH.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 21 November 2007 18:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48
Garry Whizz.
"As for teaching H&S in school. Poor and impractical idea."

If you are safety professional then, may I ask you to review the PSHE area of the curriculum as part of your on-going development. You may also want to consider Key Stage 4 elements of work related learning and the forthcoming National Diplomas.
Mick,
My answer to your question is if you are providing these as part of their school equipment, then you must plan to instruct, inform and supervise relevant to the risk.
Proportionality, achievability and practicality should be the watch word of your management plan. You might look at what you do for the IT equipment that you already have in school as a benchmark for what is required in terms of learning. Informed parental consent may also be an important part of your management plan. No doubt the e-safety aspects of this project will be covered by the Becta advice.
Sorry I cannot be more specific with the detail you have given.
Admin  
#27 Posted : 21 November 2007 18:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Liesel
Reading this thread has been interesting: it's easy to see how we can end up with two extremes of opinion. Also to be a little pedantic there is also the issue that the DSE regs don't actually apply here as the children are not employees or self-employed....

Perhaps the thing to do is to try put aside concern about civil liabilities and think about a pragmatic response?

First off, I do not in any way under-rate the impact of RSI- I have long-term spine damage so I know at first hand the impact of poor posture- however I am not at all convinced that quoting the "formal legal" situation would help here.

IMO, by all means give some "common sense" guidelines on using laptops. Along with same about sitting properly at the desk when writing in your schoolbooks (anyone sat on a school chair recently?), carrying your books home from school and so forth. Laptop use is only one of many activities done by school pupils (home and in school) that can give you a "bad back" later on... But again, much of this is HOW you present the whole shebang... I tend also to agree that it could be ever so easy to end up down the "bonkers conkers" route on this one.

As for my background, I have considerably less formal H&S quals than many on here- but I've also watched my nephew & niece and friends and using a laptop is certainly not the only risk factor in terms of ergonomics... if you saw how much time they spend texting (and using the playstation), reading, plus the angle they sit at/lie on floor at to write in good ol'-fashioned paper exercise books for homework you'd realise what I mean. That's before we get to the hours on the phone to their mates with the receiver tucked under their head so they can eat/use playstation/paint their nails etc whilst they talk......

So how would I do it? Yes, advice- but make it more in the nature of general health advice as part of overall personal development curriculum. Talk about using the (mobile)phone, texting etc too. (Perhaps you want to debate the media scare-type stories about harm from phone emissions when you're on the subject...?) Maybe even a little tiny mention about work things as a link..... but please, please, leave the DSE regs book on the shelf when you do it. I cannot think of a quicker way to turn off my young relatives than quoting "rules" at them....

But that is JMO though- and as I say I guess I am a lot less well "qualified" than most on here.
Admin  
#28 Posted : 22 November 2007 09:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sally
We do have legal obligations to pupils despite them not being employees or self employed. Legally they come under section 3 'may be affected by your undertaking'

All the advice given by those advocating the approach of giving them some sensible advice on posture etc are on the right lines. You never know the info you give them may influence they way they use their playstations as well!!!

I work as a schools safety adviser to a local council and am of the belief that if we can start teaching children about health and safety now it will make some other safety advisers job much easier when they hit the workplace.

Judith
Admin  
#29 Posted : 22 November 2007 09:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MICK MEAD, CMIOSH
Many thanks for all your input. You confirm that my thoughts were very much along the right line.

Best regards,

Mick
Admin  
#30 Posted : 22 November 2007 12:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julian Wilkinson
Hi Mick,

there are so many conflicting comments with this thread, dont leave me/us in suspense with how you are going tackle it as i'm chombing at the bit!!

Cheers

Julian
Admin  
#31 Posted : 22 November 2007 13:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lilian McCartney
Just to throw something else into the pot.

Wasn't there some info given out about the heating effect if using the laptop on your lap for a long period of time?

Lilian
Admin  
#32 Posted : 22 November 2007 13:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MICK MEAD, CMIOSH
I was surprised at some of the replies I admit, however its healthy to canvass opinion for sure.
I will be recommending (if laptops are going to be issued rather than using portable memory devices, as one contibutor suggested) that the route of giving good guidance on all aspects of laptop use - with parents receipting the advice.

I share the view of some of you who think instilling some concept of h&s in young people (without ruining their fun!)is important.
I notice that my handheld game console warns me about safety everytime I switch it on, so maybe such advice & guidance would influence some of the pupils.
I certainly dont think we should fall into a trap of not advising because we feel the kids wont listen - isn't it our job to influence and motivate??

Thanks again for all replies

Mick
Admin  
#33 Posted : 22 November 2007 13:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By mike morland
Having read all the comments in this thread, please forgive me if I happen to repeat anything someone has already mentioned.

It's great that the school has the initiative and funding to be able to consider issuing all pupils with a laptop.

However, I can't help think that if anything goes wrong somewhere then the school will be held responsible by either someone in the LEA, HSE or a parent. Remember we live in a world of litigation.

Surely the initiative has to be entered into by all concerned and each has to take some degree of responsibility. The school for educating the child on the potential problems associated with using a laptop. For example: do they know that a laptop should not be used on their lap! It can cause burns. What if the child leaves the laptop on their bed, turned on and unattend - Potential fire?

Oh dear and we haven't even got to the 'sitting correctly' part.

Children do not have the forsight of 'common sense' as it is hoped that this attribute comes with age and experience (or not) and therefore they need to be at least advised.

Perhaps the school could issue the laptops at an evening session where each child is accompanied by an adult/parent who will also be expected to listen to the advice on WRULD. If the parents can't be bothered to take an interest for their own childs safety in order to recieve a 'free' laptop then they shouldn't get one.

Roll on Friday.

With the continued introduction of technology into childrens lives such as MP3 players, mobile phones (text messaging), nintendo's and the likes, along with sitting in the dark with a laptop on the bed then what more can we expect other than a child with poor hearing, arthritis of the thumbs suffering from blinding headaches and serious back problems not to mention over weight and all before they reach mid twenties.

Climbing down from soap box.

Regardless of the Regulations, if the school supplies the laptops then it must take responsibility for any training and advise required.

Admin  
#34 Posted : 22 November 2007 14:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kenneth Patrick
15 School pupils and college students are not covered by the Regulations as they are considered to be members of the public and reg 1(4)(c) excludes workstations provided for them (see L26 para 22). However under the Health and Safety (Training for Employment) Regulations 1990, trainees are included as employees for the purposes of health and safety unless they are receiving instruction in educational institutions. Therefore, trainees would be subject to the DSE Regulations if they habitually use display screen equipment as
a significant part of their normal work. "Work" in this context refers to the training received by trainees.

also for the wider issues raised about laptops

CRR304/2000 Health and safety portable display screen equipment
To determine the extent of health problems associated with portable DSE, and the risk .... purposes of this report, includes laptops and notebooks. ...
www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2000/crr00304.pdf
Admin  
#35 Posted : 22 November 2007 14:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Duell
**Regardless of the Regulations, if the school supplies the laptops then it must take responsibility for any training and advise required.** (Mike Morland)

Surely that's the point isn't it? Whether the DSE regs (or any other law) apply or not, isn't there a moral responsibility? And come to that, with the amount that kids are using computers in schools anyway, shouldn't they be getting posture, etc training regardless of whether the get laptops or not?

As far as I know, when I was at primary school, the school didn't have a legal responsibility to tell us about not accepting sweeties from strangers - but they did, because it was a life skill we needed.
Admin  
#36 Posted : 22 November 2007 14:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DRB
Tabs said "Would you like to defend the personal injury case brought in two years time? (A real 'class action'). What line would you take"?

I would happily defend such a case and would probably rely on causation especially if the claimant has their own home computer or games consul/mobile phone.

"class action" joke but v v funny! Do you mind if I use it as my own sometime?

Cheers

Admin  
#37 Posted : 22 November 2007 15:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Taylor14
4) Nothing in these Regulations shall apply to or in relation to-
(a) drivers' cabs or control cabs for vehicles or machinery;
(b) display screen equipment on board a means of transport;
(c) display screen equipment mainly intended for public operation;
(d) portable systems not in prolonged use;
(e) calculators, cash registers or any equipment having a small data or measurement display required for direct use of the equipment; or
(f) window typewriters

Does D not apply??
Admin  
#38 Posted : 22 November 2007 16:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By mike morland
Peter

(d) does not apply. Mick already said will be 'in prolonged' use.

Are we now trying to find a reason/justification for not 'educating' the users or even worse a justification for the school not to have to bother with any extra work that this initiative might bring.

The school must consider the potential health implications of its chosen actions and adopt 'best practice'



Admin  
#39 Posted : 22 November 2007 19:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DRB
Mike, you mentioned that we live in a world of litigation. That's not actually correct. We live in a world of perceived litigation. There's a difference and if you use the former to drive H&S you'll loose sight of the real objectives!

And on that note I'm going home. Good night all!
Admin  
#40 Posted : 23 November 2007 09:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Interesting debate and clearly shows some of the polarised views amongst practitioners.

I would also like to add that we live in a world where you cannot eradicate every risk. There is no point in 'cotton wooling' children, they must find about about risk through experience eg cut and bruised knees from playgrounds.

That said, sensible precautions need to be employed and if a prolonged exposure to any hazard could cause long-lasting ill health effects, then these need to be addressed. However, I would need a lot of convincing that even regular use of a laptop/computer is likely to effect the health of fit and healthy children. Surely simple advice like regular breaks and ensuring the device does not pose an electrical hazard is the most that is needed.

Ray
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.