Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 November 2007 12:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By srd I want our company to implement the OHSAS 18001 standard. To keep costs down I would like to work through the process myself as opposed to getting in a consultant. To calculate the savings of doing it myself, can anyone give me a rough idea of how much a consultant would charge to help us get a system in place up to, BUT NOT INCLUDING, the auditing and certification stages? Stephen.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 November 2007 13:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch Hi srd. It would depend on a whole series of variables including: Nature of business - number of locations, types of risk etc Size of business Systems in place Competence of workforce etc etc etc Regards, Peter
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 November 2007 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gerry Marchant Stephen...i'm just implementing 14001 (same principles as 18001) and the cost so far is my time...we started 6 months ago and looking at cert. in mar 08 consultant would of cost me 5k with less headache...deoends how far you want to go Gerry
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 November 2007 16:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By srd Thanks both. The reasoning behind posting the question is that I could go on an OHSAS 18001 Certificate course for around £1,300, which would obviously benefit myself, and would certainly be cheaper than using a consultant at £5,000. The price difference may persuade my company to send me on the course! Stephen
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 November 2007 16:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AF I would be wary at taking consultancy costs at face value. Any person who understands exactly what is involved in the development, implementation & coordination of any management system, knows exactly that costs are not restricted just to that of consultancies. Take, on average - Accreditation fees (depends on size of company/nature of business) will vary on number of man-days used (average 6 - 9 days at implementation for medium sized organisation) at around £600 - £700 per man-day Training costs will vary - not just a simple factor of doing an auditor course for yourself, as you require to be independent of the area to be audited, again minimum 2 auditors trained at average £800 - £1000 for a 3 day course If you use a consultancy, try on average 10 - 15 days work at average £300 - 500 per day Then you have the costs required for implementing corrective actions, to meet the standard - ie PPE, Engineering Controls, Specialised Assessments, etc, etc - Over and above this, once certification has been achieved, then you have annual surveillance fees, annual certification management fees, etc Whole lot more than £5K??? Try around minimum £12 - 14K on average With ISO 14001, there is business support grants available (in Scotland) to absorb up to 50% of that, but nothing for OHSAS 18001. Dont just look at what is in front of you, there are a whole lot of other costs you require to look at also. Plus of course there is your time and effort also, as well as key members of your management team - it is virtually impossible to do unless you have the support of others.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 November 2007 19:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By srd Thanks for the reply AF. I appreciate that there are many costs associated with implementing the system, as you pointed out. I had intended to implement 18001 up to the point of accreditation, but not actually get accredited, rather like going down the HSG65 route, so accreditaion fees would not apply. As for auditing, there are other qualified lead auditors within our group who I could possibly get to perform that function. At the moment I am trying to just compare the costs of implementing 18001 ourselves (without actually actually getting accredited) with the costs of getting a consultant to assist with this. Presumably the associated costs of any corrective measures that may be required will be the same whichever route we choose to take. Basically I would like to go down the HSG65 route to keep costs to a minimum, but I recognise that 18001 integrates better with the Environmental and Quality standards, which we would eventually like to achieve, so perhaps it is better to 'futureproof' our system and choose 18001 in the first place. That sums up my thinking. Stephen.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 November 2007 08:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel Does attending a course make you competent or am I missing something! As for DIY: It's a great idea in many ways - However the course costs will have to be doubled at least as for every moment you are not doing your day job you are costing the company £ so that loss has to be added to the course etc costs Yes we should stretch ourselves and undertake a course but also pick the brains of the consultant at the same time; so do both if you can
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 November 2007 08:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul L Williams Stephen, If you are operating a H&S management system to HS(G)65 and have good auditing, document control and a legal register then you should be almost there anyway. I have recently had a BSI pre-assessment audit against OHSAS 18001, without making any significant changes to my current system beforehand. I sailed through the audit without any non-conformance's, in fact the auditor said my system was better than some companies he visits who already have the accreditation. So the moral of the story is get a pre-assessment done to gauge where you are, if you get any non-conformance's you with then have a gap plan to work towards implementation. Regards Paul
Admin  
#9 Posted : 22 November 2007 08:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Picking up on Bob Ys posting. Unless you have had previous experience of setting up ISO systems then I thnk you will find consultancies far more efficient in practice especially if you have a shortish time scale, ie 6 months. From my position I tend to encourage companies to consider at least partial consultancy support Costs can always be saved by utilising exisiting procedures, modified to meet the specific needs. As you already have auditors I presume that you also have 9001 and/or 14001 so the steps to make change are not that great. Please ensure that you cross reference back when you share procedures etc. A good consultant will advise you on this. Bob
Admin  
#10 Posted : 22 November 2007 09:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian G Hutchings Hi srd Just to add to this and hopefully help with cost estimations; one response quotes a rate of £300 to £500 per day. A well qualified and well experienced consultant will usually cost more than this. It depends whether you use a sole trader, limited company or bigger name such as LRQA etc. You should also calculate what your day rate is based on employment costs and adding value, i.e. can you spend your time more efficiently on other things whilst using a consultant to develop systems for you. The benefits of using a good consultant (you need to check their references and credentials) is that they can work fast and implement things more quickly because they have done it time and time again. If you go for the lowest price you will usually get what you pay for! I am happy to enter into offline dialogue based on my market research into costs, value etc. and past work for larger consultancies such as DNV. I offer this with no sales objective but to assist you in making an informed decision. All the best Ian
Admin  
#11 Posted : 22 November 2007 09:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel Please do not lose site of the fact that where a system may pass an audit an improvement notice can still be issued as auditors are not enforcers! I have attended audits where the parameters of the audit met the reality situation on site however both did not allow full compliance to law After experience of QA systems since ~1969 I note that such systems can be set up to pass audits and yet still fail to comply with the law so managers get into a false safety zone and think that these systems are the answer to all their manging problems when that is not always the case
Admin  
#12 Posted : 22 November 2007 10:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian G Hutchings Hi I agree with Bob here; it's a good point. I have worked with clients who have the certificates in place but have poor health and safety standards on the ground. You need to consider both and ensure whichever route that you choose, legal compliance as the bare minimum is assured for your organisation. I have found that some certification bodies are easier to gain certification from than others. Some companies know this and will go for the less costly version that gets them the certificate, but doesn't add any further value in terms of advice and ongoing support and service. All the best Ian
Admin  
#13 Posted : 22 November 2007 10:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By srd Thanks for all of your responses so far. I am considering embarking on the distance learning BSI Certificate In Occupational H&S Management Systems in my own time, if the company will fork out for it. I accept that working towards implementing 18001 will make serious demands on my time and that of others. I am more concerned with making the company a safer place in which to work, than simply to put in place systems whose sole purpose is to pass the 'test'. Stephen.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 22 November 2007 11:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AF Both Ian & Bob make valid points in relation to a "certified" system falling well short of the minimum legal requirements. Like all the other standards, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 27000, etc. Ask yourself the question, why do we want to go for the standard? If it is purely for the "certification" or "badge" (to aid sales), then I would question the reason for certification. If the aim is purely to look at becoming a more effective and efficient organisation, and learning from your shortfalls, then go for it, continually learning and becoming better and better as each year passes - this is called continual improvement (but then I dont need to remind you of its importance) In terms of accreditation bodies, there are some good, and some bad, but you cannot go wrong with accreditation with one of the "big five"
Admin  
#15 Posted : 22 November 2007 11:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith AF, Have you got confused between the terms certification and accreditation?
Admin  
#16 Posted : 22 November 2007 12:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AF Arran Linton Smith You asking an old hand with over 20 years experience in management systems? I am perfectly aware of distinguishing between accreditation and certification. In the past, some employers have seen achieving the certificate as being a badge to have on the wall, and no real purpose coming from the actual system itself. I suppose the revised ISO 9000 & ISO 14000 standards have gone some way to alleviating this a little, however there are still some today who are still seen as "badge chasers" and I refuse point blank to deal with these. Alex
Admin  
#17 Posted : 22 November 2007 12:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Alex, What do you mean by the "big five"?
Admin  
#18 Posted : 22 November 2007 12:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AF The "big five" in my opinion are the top 5 accreditation bodies which are held in high regard (not sure if I can name them for fear of breaching AUG's) whilst they may be more expensive than some of the lesser known accreditation bodies (again dont want to name examples for fear of breaching AUG's), certification by some of the lesser known bodies aint worth the paper they are printed on!
Admin  
#19 Posted : 22 November 2007 13:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Alex, As far as I am aware, (for ISO 9001 and 14001 purposes), in the UK there is only one accreditation body. If you look at http://en.wikipedia.org/...ted_Certification_Bodies and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9001 this may help clarify the difference between accreditation and certification.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 22 November 2007 14:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AF Oooop's silly me, thats me sorted out! Even after 20 odd years of implementing management systems, I still learn something new every day. Thats accreditation body - UKAS who certifies the certification bodies (BSI, LRQA, DNV, SGS etc)
Admin  
#21 Posted : 23 November 2007 17:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Coming a bit late to this thread and immediately declaring my interest, I'm a consultant. (but you knew that, didn't you ?) We don't do H&S certification/accreditation but do on quality and environment. But we do guide clients (no, we are NOT looking for any more business at the moment. Thank you) towards complying with the standard(s) and I have put that in plural because there are more than OHSAS 18001 and HSG65 out there. Some larger companies even have their own standards. To answer one point, part of the initial audit is to question how the H&S people stay up-to-date on legislation and best practice. And then to spot-check that they do. (no-one is going to pay you enough days to make sure they comply with everything) (a life's work !) Next point : training course or consultant ? Go for a decent (not a cheap) consultant. We normally have experienced a number or different companies, industries and cultures. And we have all sorts of really wicked tricks for getting managers to do what they should be doing. And, coming from outside of the company, we usually have more clout than the poor H&S person (training course/diploma notwithstanding) I have just got back today from a visit to a site where the H&S person was totally hostile to the idea of a consultant being imposed on her. A year or so later she buys the coffee and offers the roll-up makings. Finally : Price. Good consultants are not cheap. (I reckon I'm a good one and I know I am not cheap) and there are a lot of factors which tell me that £250 a day is very cheap indeed. I can list them if you like. You gets what you pays for. (but I would say that wouldn't I ?) Trust me. I'm a consultant. Merv Friday note for the Minotaurs : THIS IS REALLY NOT A COMMERCIAL MESSAGE. WE ARE NOT, REPEAT NOT, LOOKING FOR MORE BUSINESS IN THE UK. ENOUGH ALL READY ! And would I breach the AUG ? Nah.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.