IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Sensitisation and Allegeric Reaction - are they the same?
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TK Your views appreciated.
I'm reviewing a COSHH form from we use that asks zillions of questions!
A series of questions cover health effects from exposure
Are sensitisation and allergic reaction the same? Any examples where different?
Thanks
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By andyp TK,
Sensitisation & allergic reaction are two separate entities. Sensitisation is where the substance / material etc causes an inability for the individual to effectively fight infections, diseases etc.
For example, solder fluxes can cause sensitisation in individuals with prolonged or uncontrolled use; the sensitisation often results in the individual contracting occupational asthma despite the individual not suffering from it previously.
In brief, sensitisation may often result in long term health effects i.e. occupational asthma, eczema, dermatitis etc. Whereas an allergic reaction often causes an immediate & short term health problem i.e. rash, shortness of breath etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Bannister TK, there are several occupational hygienists who lurk on this forum who may give a better answer than mine but here goes:
Some individuals may become sensitised to an allergen, sometimes on first contact, sometimes after several of many contacts.
Once they are sensitised they may suffer an allergic reaction.
Therefore sensitisation precedes the allergic reaction.
Typical scenario: painter using two-pack paint that contains isocyanates. Becomes sensitised and on NEXT EXPOSURE suffers a severe asthma attack.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Drury Yes I think they are.
I have an allergy to wasp stings and my medical notes state.
"Sensitisation causing acute allergic reaction"
The first is a condition, allergic reation is an effect following exposure.
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adrian Watson TK,
David is quite right. Sensitisation and allergy are linked but not the same. Sensitisation is the production of anti-bodies; Allergy is the production of an allergic response. These include conditions such as rhinitis, allergic induced asthma, or allergic contact dermatitis.
You need to be sensitised to get an allergic response, but because you are sensitised does not mean that you will develop an allergic response. e.g. A third of persons exposed to isocyanates produce antibodies, but less than a quarter of these will develop rhinitis or asthma.
Regards Adrian
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Grace TK, Not entirely sure I agree with the comments that the two conditions are the same.
Allergies/allergic reactions are an abnormal response of the body's immune system to some form of stimulus. Thus people display an allergic reaction from exposure to cat fur/saliva. The body recognises a foreign protein and seeks to overcome it.
Sensitisation is a result of exceptional or repeated exposure to a stimulus that generates antibodies in the boy. And then when the body experiences an exposure in the future the allergic reaction or response is triggered. The problem is that the future exposures can be at very low levels, below those that would be regarded as causing occupational problems. Thus a person who works with isocyanates could become sensitised through repeated low level exposures AND then having stopped working at the factory display an allergic reaction following some low level, incidental exposure in another workplace, at home etc. It should be noted that there are reported cases of sensitisation occurring after single high exposures e.g. if there were a large volume escape in the workplace.
Once upon a time there were problems with workers in some industries who became sensitised to nickel who would then display an allergic reaction from handling cupro-nickel coins or wearing a watch with a nickel plated buckle. Similarly healthcare workers who use latex gloves can ,over time become sensitised such that even the slightest exposure to latex can trigger an allergic/asthmatic reaction. (Dugmore case)
Hope this helps: Phil A tip which you may know: In Google type define: sensitisation (or whatever it is you want to know about)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TK Thanks for all the replies which are all very helpful.
I mentioned I was reviewing the COSHH assessment form we use.
On the same vaine another question asks:
Could adverse effects occur from repeated or low level exposure over time?
Any idea what we're talking about here. Is this superfluous?
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter Thomas
Absorption of anything which accumulates in the body could eventually give rise to adverse effects as the body burden increases. Lead springs to mind although it is not a COSHH issue.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Hamilton Just read this thread, as has my nurse prescriber wife who agrees with the views above, that the two are linked but different.
John
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Packham 1. Sensitisation is the development in the body of antibodies or t-lymphocytes that are specific to a particular molecule. This is the first step in developing an allergic reaction. However, it is perfectly possible to be sensitised but not allergic. 2. Allergy is when as a result of sensitisation on subsequent exposure to the molecule and when this has penetrated the body to reach the relevant cells (mast cell or langerhans cell depending upon the type of immune reaction) this then overreacts to release excessive quantities of inflammatory mediators, e.g. histamine. 3. It is possible to be exposed repeatedly, possibly for many years, to a sensitiser with no sensitisation or allergic reaction. This can occur at any time with no prior warning. These is no prior indication nor any immediate sign of sensitisation. It is only on the subsequent exposure that an allergic reaction may occur. 4. Once sensitisation has occurred, any subsequent exposure may lower the threshold at which an allergic reaction occurs, thus increasing the probability of an allergic reaction. 5. In response to your other query, with irritant contact dermatitis it is almost always chronic and multifactorial, i.e. due to repeated exposures to many different irritants over a period of time, possibly years. This makes identifying the actual cause of an irritant contact dermatitis often very difficult.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TK Thanks for all the responses. As usual excellent advice.
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Sensitisation and Allegeric Reaction - are they the same?
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.