Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 November 2007 09:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker
For my own interest, I want to research (in wider terms than H&S) a behavioural issue, but I’m not sure what it’s called.

This came about talking to a RAC man. He was telling me that there are over 200 instances every week of people putting Petrol in Diesel cars (and visa versa). This is despite: Nozzle sizes being different, filler caps colour coded, nozzles colour coded, hoses colour coded, the smell, and the words Petrol & Diesel not being at all similar. He says most folks instantly (after bunging in 40 quids worth of fuel) realise what they have done. Personally I’m so paranoid about doing this, I give myself a little TBT at the pump even pointing to the words etc ;-)))

So…… what do Psychologists & Behaviourists call this? And is it the same as me driving to work on a familiar route and suddenly thinking “was that light I just driven through on red”.

Can anyone point me to some good sources of information – I’m not after basic H&S stuff.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 November 2007 09:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sally
I did some work a while back with a behaviour psychologist who referred to moments like this as 'alpha sleep'. Essentially where your mind switches off but your body keeps moving. I don't remember much else about it.

The guy's name was Eddie Wood. Hope this is some help
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julian Wilkinson
Scatter brain comes to mind as in:

A giddy or thoughtless person; one incapable of concentration or attention

There is also Human Error, when you determine the risk likelihood of human error it can be called a 'Probabilistic Risk Assessment'

Not sure if this helps or not, just some observations
Admin  
#4 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Cartwright
A BLOND MOMENT!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Duell
I think you've got to sub-divide it: How many of those people were driving an unfamiliar vehicle and just did what they do in their own car? I'm sure that'd be a different psychological mechanism to the others.

Been there, done that - with the unfamiliar vehicle. Although in my own defence, I WAS told that morning "don't forget the minibus needs petrol" - so I bought petrol!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian G Hutchings
Jim

This sounds like an attentional slip of action. You have the skill to undertake the task correctly; so it is like someone who is trained and has undertaken the task safely before. On this occasion they have a lapse; what sometimes ends up on poor examples of investigation reports as lack of concentration!

In certain industries reminder appliances are used and other devices to assist the potential for human error.

Ian
Admin  
#7 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian G Hutchings
Jim

If you email me I have examples from training in investigation techniques I use.


Ian
Admin  
#8 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Duell
...and a bit of Googling produced this...

http://www.ioshwestscotl...es%20-%20Sept%202005.doc
Admin  
#9 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Lochlyn Ure
Jim

If you have a copy of the excellent James Reason book 'Human Error' have a look at Chapter 6 'A Design For A Fallible Machine'. The premise of the chapter is to answer the question "what kind of information handling device could operate correctly for most of the time, but also produce the occasional wrong response characteristic of human behaviour?"

Interesting one - keep us posted as to how you go on.

Cheers

Andrew
Admin  
#10 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By WTaylor
No pun intended but from memory it's called a lapse.

Google for safety and human factors. You'll find some good bedtime reading on slips, lapses, mistakes and violations.

Regards,

Will
Admin  
#11 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
A few terms come to mind,

stressed out,
force of habit,
idiotic,
lack of concentration,

I did his a few times some years ago when I owned a diesel car and had a petrol engine company car. I put petrol into the diesel tank twice but never diesel into the petrol tank which I believe would have been much worse.

Admin  
#12 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julian Wilkinson
strangely enough, whilst replying to this post earlier one of my colleagues carried out a weekly fire alarm test.

One of the tasks is to isolate the plant when activating the alarm to prevent a shut down. This was all carried out fine until he went to put the plant back to 'normal' instead of doing this he turned the plant to 'off' and shut the plant down!!!

I asked him what do you call it when someone does something like this?

He said 'a stupid moment' :-))
Admin  
#13 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lilian McCartney
This is very interesting. I think its similar to when you're 'told' not to do or say something and that's what you do.

For example, when someone says don't look - you automatically look.
when they say don't mention xxxx the first thing you say is xxxx

I think it must have a name but don't know what it is.

Looking forward to finding out

Lilian
Admin  
#14 Posted : 27 November 2007 10:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By I H
Done quite a bit on this myself and it leads to some interesting conclusions. The Alpha sleep is spot on and I would well recommend following it up, although some quarters it has been debunked, especially the capacity for remembering stuff, look up the 5+-2 rule for starters.

Once we become used to something, when we do it we lapse into alpha sleep and do it automatically because we know how to do it. Then we can introduce another task, and another. However a change in the primary task leads to failure. e.g. I know how to fill my car up so I do it without thinking and occupy my mind with picking my lottery numbers. The garage has had a refurb and moved the pumps round and I don't notice.

Now put it in a safety context, a man has to drill 40 holes in a concrete floor slab. His capacity for remembering stuff at the front of his mind is between 3 and 7 items during the task. How many hazards does he have to remember? How many other things does he have to think about? What personal things is he thinking about? Got 7 items yet?

As he walks backwards do you think he can remember his toolbox he put behind him?

Here's the bit that will get the response.
No more than 5 items in a risk assessment that rely on the operative to do something. Its impossible for them to remember it at the crucial time!
Admin  
#15 Posted : 28 November 2007 16:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brando
Has anyone come across a good book on the alhpa sleep problem??

I don't have a problem ( or at least not so far ) with petrol / diesel pumps but I am always hitting the wrong numbers on the coffee machine. You want a 22 but you hit a 23 ( and always when I have no more change to make another choice!!! ).

Brando
Admin  
#16 Posted : 28 November 2007 18:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Mitchell
I always think of it as 'unconsciously competent'.

i.e. with any given task you will be unconsciously incompetent, then consciously incompetent, then consciously competent, and finally unconsciously competent.

The last is of course the dangerous stage!

A child in the back seat of a car has no inclination of how it moves and is at stage one (unconsiously incompetent). The older child is aware that something makes it move, but not how to drive themselves (consciously incompetent). The new driver knows how to drive the car, but lacks experience, and is therefore consciously competent, concentrating on every gear change! The old driver has been doing it for so long they may slip into auto pilot.

Hope this helps, think it is in the NEBOSH cert course, or was on mine...
Admin  
#17 Posted : 05 December 2007 08:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope
I asked an occupational psychologist to comment on this query - here is Emily Hutchinson's reply

I'd say this is a classic error of action, or a 'slip' in James Reason's terms - so its the right action, but with the wrong thing. It happens when people are on automatic pilot - our brains have evolved to be very efficient at automating routine behaviours so that we can carry out familiar actions without allocating any attentional resource to them. The downside of this is that sometimes it goes wrong, so if we're carrying out a routine action such as filling the car up, we may not be focussing on th task sufficiently to notice which nozzle we've picked up. There is also a tendency for a cognitive bias called confirmation bias - we tend to look for information that confirms that what we're doing is as we think, so even if the nozzle is a different colour, we may either not perceive that or perceive it but not interpret that this means an error.

She can be contacted on emily@ejhconsulting.co.uk
07763 187382
Admin  
#18 Posted : 05 December 2007 09:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bruce Sutherland
1) irritating when you have to pay for it! we have had at least 7 of these over the last 3 years

2) with the causation in mind - not always a pattern either - more in the morning - but not just morning and not always when people maniac - but would tend to suggest the deep meaningful stuff already posted is very correct

3) completely poor design - there is no common colour for hoses, and what would be wrong with a triangle for diesel nozzles - ie tell everyone in 6 months that the filler would change and sell plastic triangle inserts so that rounds would not go into

however as has been pointed out all that in reality happens is that the fuel companies do is sell more fuel of the correct grade - so not much point for them

yours in consolation

Bruce
Admin  
#19 Posted : 05 December 2007 13:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs
We covered things like this in Ergonomics. Rather than a name, we classified.

This instance would be 'Right process; wrong article' (filling up ok but with wrong fuel).

Another would be 'Right process; wrong action' (water leak, turning tap, but turning wrong way).

Another would be 'Wrong process, right action' (going to the wrong control panel, but hitting the right button on that panel).

Etc., naming wasn't really needed.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 05 December 2007 14:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By BB
Fits the Rasmussen model.

The terms skill, rule and knowledge based information processing refer to the degree
of conscious control exercised by the individual over his or her activities.

A bit like a SPAD is a skill based error, Kegworth was rule based etc.

Or it fits the Simpson model of D'OH!
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.