Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 29 November 2007 10:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By M J Matthews
HI

Just a quickie

just had a case where an employee who suffered an injury at work, which was treated by one of our first aiders, the guy came to see me yesterday and complained that his thumb (site of injury) was bruised and swollen, I had one of our first aiders take him to local hospital.
They prescribed antibiotics which he had to pay for, Is there any thing anywhere that states we should re-emburse him for this cost, HR putting up walls (never done it before,don't want to start now syndrome.

Regards

Mick.M
Admin  
#2 Posted : 29 November 2007 11:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant
An employer has to provide "first aid" but that doesn't extend to paying for medication or any costs of treatment during their recovery - that's what the NHS is for.

The employee could of course make a civil claim against you for personal injury and use that to pay for the prescription...
Admin  
#3 Posted : 29 November 2007 12:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
Your Organisation will have to be open to operating a 'goodwill' approach.
Consider the obvious parallel of the employee suffering a loss or damage to personal property due to that accident? What does the Organisation do for that? Many organisations would reimburse without recourse to their insurers for such trifling amounts as for (e.g.) a coat or a pair of trousers, do why not for the prescription as well?
On the other hand, if personal loss was extensive (e.g. damage to private vehicle, personal belongings), then the addition of other related costs (prescription) would similarly not be unreasonable?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 29 November 2007 12:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AHS
I agree with Ron.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 29 November 2007 12:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By M J Matthews
Hi

Thanks for the responses, I will try again and use the position Goodwill as opposed to claims for costs via a insurance claim.

Once again many thanks

Regards

Mick M
Admin  
#6 Posted : 29 November 2007 16:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant
Goodwill is one thing but you're in danger of setting a precedent that'll cost you in the long term. Call it cynical but having worked in countries where medicare payments are fought over every ten seconds it's a slippery slope if you start.

"I think I caught a cold from someone in the office. I want all my medicines paid for as you paid for that bloke's..."
Admin  
#7 Posted : 29 November 2007 17:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DRB
I can see Dave's point but I think in such clear cut circumstances where the injury is obviously been caused at work and the costs arising out of a genuine need, as prescribed by the hospital then it would be good man management to cover these costs on a "one off basis".

You could develop a company policy on such matters. In a previous life we frequently had employees off as a result of work related RTA's or violence. Each would be dealt with on a individual basis but frequently where full salary and a bit of TLC was given no claim would follow and vice versa.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 30 November 2007 09:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT
I'd reimburse all reasonable expenses for any accident/incident at work but be clear on liability admission.

CFT
Admin  
#9 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Pike CMIOSH
Mick

Just to add my 'two pennorthworth', clearly different organisations will have different rules but if you start to pay prescription chrges you are opening the floodgates to 'winter ills'and the associated costs of coughs and colds that will be linked to the workplace... however tenuously that may be.

Setting such a precedent must be very carefully considered.

Consider if you were working for an employer that had offices, shops, factories etc in England and also in Wales, (of which there must be many I guess?) the welsh employees would have their prescriptions free of charge because of the decision taken by the National Assembly of Wales to make prescription 'free' for those living in Wales, so even as a 'United (sic) Kingdom' there is inequality!!!

So would those who have suggested that this should be paid for also advocate that in order to promote fairness and equality that companies with premises in both England and Wales should compensate the England based employess for prescriptions?

As for my personal circumstances, I am a welshman living and working in the Czech Republic and I, along with everyone else has to put my hand into my pocket for prescribed medication.... welcome to the European Union eh?

Dave
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.