Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 November 2007 08:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Darren (Daz) Fraser
Morning

Simple question, that may not have a simple answer

In your opinion, have spent many hours and in some cases many pounds in achieving the relevant qualifications, completing IPD / CPD etc and then becoming a fellow, chartered member etc, what if any is the benefit to you as an individual of letters after you name?

The 2 reasons for asking

1. I am already an AIIRSM, and early next year, meet the criteria to apply to IOSH for Tech status, but other than for use on a CV (no intention of moving positions at this moment in time), I cannot see the benefit.

2. Outside of the profession, does anybody know what the differences are between the grades and bodies.

I look forward to seeing your comments.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 November 2007 09:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT
Darren

Your asking the impossible; letters after name (yawn) sorry at a half century and a few years of age I am not impressed anymore by them. Generically this is going to be very difficult for people to answer as each person has differing reasons for achieving a certain level of qualifications, and greatly depends on the level of competency required for the task/s; never forget that the letters are just that, and they do not necessarily represent the true worth of an individual, or tell you the person is in fact competent at their duties!

Smy take anyway Darren.

Have a good weekend

CFT
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 November 2007 09:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Darren

Wide ranging questions but:

1. Yes, you need to consider your future career aspirations. It is difficult to obtain good jobs without today, it will be even more difficult in the future. Good qualifications do not replace experience, common sense etc. That said, would go to an accountant or a chartered accountant for advice?

2. Forgot what it is...oh yes good question, the general public probably could not differentiate between a CMIOSH and KBCE. However, most know that people with post nominals after their name are 'educated' and 'qualified' professionals. They do of course have the opportunity to check what all those letters mean if they so wish.

Regards

Ray TFIF
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 November 2007 10:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By BB
I've always been suspicious of people who claim to be competent but are afraid to be scrutinised under peer review.

CMIOSH includes the element of CPD. Some of the old MIOSHs who gained their membership with slightly squiffy credentials, never bothered with CPD and hence RSP status will/have been rooted out by the new regime.

So, although CMIOSH doesn't guarantee competence, it does at least show some commitment to the cause and some truth to continual improvement - which is the whole point of our work.

So for £100 a year - I'll stand up and be counted.

Frankly, resting on an AIIRSM, TechIOSH laurel doesn't cut the mustard for me.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 30 November 2007 11:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
So, BB, does that mean you wouldn't take advice from AIIRSM or Tech IOSH individuals.
Do you think they are less competent than you are.
Aren't those individuals entitled to recognition.
After all they have shown commitment and been tested on their knowledge.
Just because someone doesn't want to, or sees no need to further their academic career, does not mean that they are any less competent or experienced than CMIOSH and beyond.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 November 2007 11:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker
Oh no! not again!!

Surely we have thrashed this one to death

Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 November 2007 11:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Cartridge
Daz


IMHO, Is it not down to personal preference?........ If you & your employer are happy with what you have (or do not have) who are we to judge, as long as the decisions & advice given are justified.

However, I am sure that we have all noticed that the "adverts" are now listing certain criteria as mandatory........you decide.


Let me be the first to wish you all a Merry Christmas


Andy (keeping my quals close to my chest)
Admin  
#8 Posted : 30 November 2007 11:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AHS
Maybe BB should check out CDM 2007 ACOP IOSH isnt even mentioned.

Admin  
#9 Posted : 30 November 2007 11:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By anon1234
It's very simple really - it all depends on what your goals are. For example with some jobs you wouldn't even get through the door to discuss how 'competent' you are and how you meet the needs of a given business if you haven't got these 'ticks in the boxes'.

Equally as I think another poster mentioned - it does help with persuading ceretain individuals that what you are saying is valid (however, I think we all recognise that this may not always be the case just because you have a few letters after your name).

The big question is how can you demonstrate your competence, and clearly this needs to be a combination of factors - and may include qualifiactions, experience, peer recognition, etc
Admin  
#10 Posted : 30 November 2007 12:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AF
This has been thrshed to death in the past

Given some of the responses so far, there are still some who think they are the elite, and above all others of lesser competency, or so they think.

And you wonder why we are getting laughed at!

A

Admin  
#11 Posted : 30 November 2007 12:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By BB
Dear Robert.,

I struck a nerve, obviously. To clarify....

1. Does that mean you wouldn't take advice from AIIRSM or Tech IOSH individuals?

Yes of course I would. Everyone has their own specialist areas in which they may be king. However, given the choice of a techIOSH and CMIOSH, if everything else is apparently equal (experience etc) I'd veer toward the CMIOSH opinion. Bloody foolish not to.

2. Do you think they are less competent than you are?

(You are also making the assumption that I am CMIOSH).
Generally a CMIOSH with degree/diploma and equivalent experience has a far better depth of understanding than a techIOSH with the same experience but NEBOSH cert. That's the whole point of education.

3. Aren't those individuals entitled to recognition?

Yes or course, but let's not start getting all back-slappy about it.

4. After all they have shown commitment and been tested on their knowledge.

Yep, a 2 weeks away from work doing a NEBOSH certificate shows unstinting commitment.

5. Just because someone doesn't want to, or sees no need to further their academic career, does not mean that they are any less competent or experienced than CMIOSH and beyond.

Fine point, well made. If someone 'doesn’t want to', that’s fine. If someone ‘can’t see a need’, that’s fine to. Depending on the role that they are fulfilling, this could also smack a little of laurel-resting and unconscious incompetence.

AN ANALOGY:

The average driver thinks they are above average skill-wise. Most drivers believe that average driving standards are getting worse. Most haven’t picked up the highway code for years, let alone undertaken any additional training of their own volition.

Conversely, an advanced driver will regularly update their knowledge and be observed and tested for competence.

The advanced driver may not actually be any better than Mr/Mrs average.

But I know who’d I choose as my chauffeur.

Res ipsa loquitor.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 30 November 2007 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
BB, ta for the book.

Take another look at AHS & AF posting.
You may even take a look outside the cocoon of eliteness.

End of.

:)
Admin  
#13 Posted : 30 November 2007 13:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By BB
I'm not elitist, I prefer to think of it as a heightened state of enlightenment...

May the force be with you.

;)
Admin  
#14 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AHS
BB did you know some CMIOSH have no safety qualifications?
Admin  
#15 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Is this the end of week wind-up.
If so -------------it's working!
Admin  
#16 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Edward Shyer
Hi AHS,

don't know if BB knew or not but I didn't please enlighten me.

Regards

Ted
Admin  
#17 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew W
I deal and have dealt with all levels of 'qualified' people, some with more post nominals than you can shake a stick at and some with none.

The competence also varies and the most letters don't always add up to the most competence.

It's down to the individual.

Andy
Admin  
#18 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brett Day

More posts that confirm that I really shouldn't bother renewing my IOSH membership next time around.

Whilst I haven't done a degree or diploma I have funded and commited to courses and learning that have expanded my skills and kept me up to date and of use to my clients.

IOSH doesn't recognise these beyond my CPD commitments ie they do not count towards CMIOSH.

And having had to clean up after more than one (then)MIOSH I'm sceptical.

FWIW IOSH has 'branded' itself so well that you need the 'badge' to progress.

So yes, the badge does count, how much importance you attach to it is up to you.

Admin  
#19 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
So, could the letters after your name also include principal area of competence

eg MIOSH (PC) as petro chemical

MIOSH (Const)---obvious that one

MIOSH (E&M)

(CP)construction plant

etc etc
Admin  
#20 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brigham
So Robert, who would assess this principle area of competence?
Post nominals do not prove competence, only people can do that!
Admin  
#21 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
I dunno
maybe I should have added another.

CMIOSH (PC)---------"Possibly Competent"

:)
Admin  
#22 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brigham
Nice one...
Admin  
#23 Posted : 30 November 2007 14:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T
would a University consider taking someone with 'O' Levels or would they prefer 'A' Levels? They don't make you a better person but they do show a higher level of understanding. Would you prefer someone who has don a 2 day course on law of someone who has had to learn it in detail over at least a year.

I find that many of those who shout loudest against CMIOSH are those who couldn't be bothered and are too lazy to gain the higher qualification, and then, have the effrontery to moan that they miss out on a job because someone has spent 2 years longer training! This is getting typical of the UK nowadays - everyone wants something without having to graft.

I hated doing the NEBOSH exams but I still did them.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 30 November 2007 15:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
RobT, no-one is shouting against IOSH, only those that hide behind the letters
Admin  
#25 Posted : 30 November 2007 15:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew W
Precisely. That's why I only show them mine if they show me theirs ;)

Andy
Admin  
#26 Posted : 30 November 2007 15:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Is that it then?
Admin  
#27 Posted : 30 November 2007 15:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48
Darren, you can be employed on H&S without any of those you mention. Just like I have met maintenance managers who know less about engineering than the average Estate Agent:):)

But then again, if I have to have a major heart op and I can choose between a partly qualified houseman or a senior consultant with all the post nominals and a good track record, I wonder which I would choose. Or is it just enough to be able to distinguish?

All these comments about competency, elitism and I am better than you because I have to clean up after CMIOSH are boring and pointless.

Post nominals are earnt. They are an indicator and do raise expectation of reasonable competency in the area to which they refer. More importantly at chartered level they govern members through professional codes of conduct.
As to public understanding, it only exists about professions they have used or need to use.
Does average voxpops know the difference between a chartered accountant and a financial adviser? What is CIPD all about? Is there only type of Mechanical Engineer or do you need many? Aren't all engineers the same really? Is there a Professional Institute for Purchasing?
I doubt the response would be any different.
Admin  
#28 Posted : 30 November 2007 15:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew W
Robert

Picking up on your earlier theme:-
CONOSH
MANOSH
ELEOSH
OILYGASSYOSH
TRUCKOSH
GOVOSH

Figure em out yourself!!

Andy
Admin  
#29 Posted : 30 November 2007 15:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Edward Shyer
Robert

"no-one is shouting against IOSH, only those that hide behind the letters"

have you any examples that you are willing to share.

Regards
Ted
Admin  
#30 Posted : 30 November 2007 15:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Andrew W wot about GOLLYGOSH, an OHMYGOSH

:) :)
Admin  
#31 Posted : 30 November 2007 15:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Edward S, no not really, just chipping in with the converstaion.

Do you?
Admin  
#32 Posted : 30 November 2007 16:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Mace
ROB T,

i was shocked by your response to this posting,
i personally have not attained CMIOSH status at this point, however to state that

"those who couldn't be bothered and are too lazy to gain the higher qualification"

is an open invitation for people to take umbridge at your comment, there are lots of reasons why people do not continue with education i.e. family commitments, lack of funding, job commitments to name but a few. This does not mean that they are lazy or not bothered, it means that circumstances outside of their influence have resulted in the situation of not being able to gain the higher qualification, and whilst i may say there are some people out there who are to lazy and can not be bothered, i would like to think that they are in the minority.

I follow this career path as i like to think i make a difference to peoples lives, if in that process i may or may not gain pollinomials what does it matter.

regards to all.

Admin  
#33 Posted : 30 November 2007 16:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Edward Shyer
no just nibbling for elaboration of comments.

Regards
Ted NOSYOSH,MADOSH,NOTBOTHEREDOSH,NOLETTERSOSH,
Admin  
#34 Posted : 30 November 2007 16:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Darren (Daz) Fraser
Did not expect to have so many responses in 1 day.

I will be moving forward with my education next year, and will eventually (fingers crossed) apply for CMIOSH status as well as MIIRSM, for no other reason than my own self achievement.

As too using post nominals - extremely unlikely.

Regarding comments of no commitment having completed a 2 week course (NGC), I found that interesting, if self funded, the person most likely either used up holiday entitlement or lost pay (as was the case of 3 of my fellow students 3.5 years ago). If funded by employer, chances are the attendee still had other work to do/catch up on their return (as was the case of the other 9, myself included).

Have a good weekend everyone, will check this thread again on Monday.

Daz

Admin  
#35 Posted : 30 November 2007 17:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By maddog RM
I believe this is how it works in reality.

If you want a:

Bridge building MICE
Build a new office block MCIOB
Someone to manage you accounts MICA
A manager MCMI
A solicitor MILE

Health and Safety advice: Anyone that is cheap and can sell himself.

How many business owners/MD's/CEO's actually know what is required to be a CMIOSH? Have they heard of IOSH?

Do they know that a manufacturing H&S professional probably isn't competent in construction?

Good thread Daz
Admin  
#36 Posted : 30 November 2007 18:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By maddog RM
Also,

IOSH is one of the very few professional institutes that you don't need a degree to be a chartered member.
Admin  
#37 Posted : 30 November 2007 18:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bobbie
And finally (maybe) for this lovely Friday evening,

TOSH

Admin  
#38 Posted : 30 November 2007 20:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By BB
Maddog RM,

That's an interesting point, about degree for chartered membership.

Although, the diplomas are often considered 'degree level' (especially dip2), I think the IOSH membership may be like this because the universities trooped up with qualifications quite late in the day, comparatively speaking.

You could originally find a diploma course but degrees were thin on the ground.

Just a thought.

BB

p.s. does the 'RM' stand for what I think it does ..in which case you'll know what elitism really is.
Admin  
#39 Posted : 02 December 2007 10:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian G Hutchings
Hi Darren

Just to add to the plethora of responses. I think certain membership levels are used as entry points for recruitment. For example, if I were recruiting for a new consultant I would say minimum CMIOSH. This will not suddenly get me the best people, the remainder of the CV and recruitment process provides that, it is for two main reasons; a) I have to be able to prove a degree of competence to clients and b) I have to be able to provide a defence should competency be questioned by clients or the legal system.

I understand that there is more to competence than just being CMIOSH, but it does provide a certain starting point and ensures that you don't get as many unsuitable CVs. It says that a person has been practising in the H&S field for a certain amount of time and has a level of qualification. It doesn't say that they have other skills that I need to request in CVs and through interview and presentation.

Cheers

Ian
Admin  
#40 Posted : 03 December 2007 09:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AF
Following my earlier posting, it is clearly becoming evident, there is a number of members who suddenly, after passing the relevant Qualifications, and after their CPD & Peer review attain CMIOSH who claim they are amongst the elite.

Taking ROB T's posting "I find that many of those who shout loudest against CMIOSH are those who couldn't be bothered and are too lazy to gain the higher qualification"

I for one have been in the HSE field for over 13 years (attaining Tech IOSH status), calling me lazy and not bothered to upgrade to the higher qualification makes my blood boil.

I have to commend Mark Mace's post, he hits the nail on the head

"there are lots of reasons why people do not continue with education i.e. family commitments, lack of funding, job commitments to name but a few. This does not mean that they are lazy or not bothered"

Whilst in some members (those who classify themselves as being amongst the elite) eyes, I am just a lowly Tech IOSH practitioner, I am confident my qualifications (Engineering Degree, Environment Degree, SVQ/NVQ level 5 management, General Certificate and many others too numerous to mention), career (working to Senior Management level), Experience (13 years experience within a multiplethora of manufacturing industries, ie chemical, engineering, forging, electronics, oil & gas, automotive, plastics and food processing) and my achievements (numerous HSE & Business excellence awards as well as obtaining certification to ISO 9000, ISO 14000, OHSAS 18000, EFSIS/BRC & ISO 22000) will put many of those "elite" memkbers to shame.

In addition to that, try being a father to 2 boys under age of 4 (at the age of 43)

So Rob T, If this is classes me as being "too lazy to gain the higher qualification", then so be it.

I enjoy doing what I do, because I know, and have made a difference to peoples lives throughout my career (and get very well paid for it)

Perhaps you need to take a look at why you are in the HSE field in the first place.......!

Alex

PS As for the higher qualification, I am currently sitting with passes on all 5 of my Diploma Part 2, Assignments and taking the June 2008 exam sitting rather than Dec 2007, (not because I am too lazy to pass, but wanting to spend time with my family)


Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.