Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 December 2007 12:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By IOSH Moderator
The thread above was removed this morning due to breach of copyright in the originating message. The moderators cannot 'fix' such a breach, except to remove the thread altogether.

The article under discussion is to be found here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/..._of_scotland/7116588.stm

The discussion point is 'Is health and safety a bit like a wheel i.e. constantly being reinvented?'

Admin  
#2 Posted : 03 December 2007 12:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colin Reeves
That story is appalling. That is the most basic of H&S precautions - thought the world had progressed from allowing unsuitable clothing thirty odd years ago!

Whilst not mentioned, I wonder if the clothing was worn as part of a religious routine / requirement? If so, the PC brigade have gone too far this time!

Colin
Admin  
#3 Posted : 03 December 2007 12:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barrie (Badger) Etter
Call me a grumpy old man but ....
When I were a lad common sense reigned. We had to either wear an apron or an overall. Sleeves were rolled up and ties came off. This five min acitivity occured BEFORE starting work in the machine shop of the school. What on earth was the teacher thinking of letting a lass near a lathe wearing a scarf?! Prime candidate for prosecution under HASAWA me thinks.

Badger
Admin  
#4 Posted : 03 December 2007 12:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philip Beale
Have to agree with Barrie on this one if you didn't have your apron then no woodworking also you had to have leather shoes on no trainers.

By the sounds of the article very little was done in the way of following the basics. unfortunately a lot of schools seem to dump this on teachers who have little experience with the equipment (not timed served)

Phil
Admin  
#5 Posted : 03 December 2007 13:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
I am just wondering when the old rules were dropped. Like others we always removed loose items like ties and scarves. It was overalls only if using the lathe, both wood and metal working. Trvor Kletz and corporate memory loss strike again methinks.

Bob
Admin  
#6 Posted : 03 December 2007 14:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker
Only thing that surprises me is that it does not happen more often.

Some 12 years ago I "banned" my kids from taking part in "resistive materials technology" (woodwork & metalwork to you) after talking to the head of dept at an open evening.

I was shocked at the lack of basic guarding way below the legal standards at the time.
I complained to the LA E dept and told them that if I operated (I worked for an engineering company) equipment of that level even using time served operatives the HSE would shut me down. Their reaction was Duh!

I don't think my kids suffered as we have a fully kitted out workshop at home and one went on to get a engineering degree.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.