Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 December 2007 17:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton
Its been said before (not least on this site) and no doubt it'll be said again, but some of you may still be interested in yet more news of police concern following the successful H&S prosecution of the met....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/...d/merseyside/7129004.stm

Ho Hum....
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 December 2007 17:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48
Steve, shame about your thread title. I think this is genuine support of H&S not the contrary.
Here is a responsible manager saying the law is an ass, or at least the way it has been administered recently leaves a lot of everyday concerns. This is not the first serving senior police officer to come out on this issue and I see it as visible support for our calls for sensible H&S. I would hazard a guess that these opinions carry far more weight than any "safety" opinion.
If that speeds a sensible outcome then I give it my full support.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 December 2007 17:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Berg
"Health and safety law says the police service, like all emergency services, should look at the risk involved and if there's a reasonable risk and they've put all the safety precautions in place can they then take it.

"That seems to be a contradiction and members of the public aren't governed by the same law.

There is no contradiction. A member of the public is governed by the same law while at work.

The police seem to really struggle with the notion of quantifying risks and giving their officers reasonable guidance.

The De Menezes case was a tragic failure to protect MOP's.

The CSO's who were who were criticised a few months ago for not wading into a pond to search for a submerged child acted perfectly reasonably. It would be like running into a cofined space to rescue sonmeone, how many are supposed to run in before the bravery standard is reached?

The Emergency Services have a duty to train and inform their employees on how to best make these judgements. The Chief Constables statement appears to be saying that his hands are tied cos of Safety Regs.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.