Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 December 2007 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David G C follow link http://www.telegraph.co....2007/12/07/npanto107.xml Regards David
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 December 2007 10:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheila EJ Keogh I think this is a shame! I went to the funniest ever gig (in a pub) some years ago, in south London, and the band (whose name I completely forget as I'd never heard of them before) actually chucked doughnuts out to the audience! It was hilarious. Yes, we picked them up and ate them too..... Those were the days................ merry Christmas, look out for flying food.....
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 December 2007 11:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sally Again it seems to be the insurance company although I'm curious as to how the insurance company knew the panto was planning on throwing sweets. Surely this is one of those situations where we have to accept that there is a risk that a child will end up with a small bruise but that the risk of that happening and the resulting injury if it doesn are so small as to be acceptable. And that any parent trying to sue should get laughed out of court
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 December 2007 13:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer My oldest girl wanted to be a journalist when she left school, but went on a school trip to the local general hospital and decided to become a nurse instead, exactly how I don't know and have been wondering for about 20 years now. She is now a very qualified and senior employee of the Health trust and responsible for all thier nursing staff, best decisions are left to the kids I suspect. Attack on the media over, but it is time the H&S profession started to fight back on this sort of mis reporting to make it clear that it is not H&S but generally insurers trying to pass the blame onto others to keep thier 'get the strength of the insurance company around you' IOSH has a site trying to speak about this but what effect is it having? We all need to speak to people and put the record straight. If it's humbug say so loudly and more commonly.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 18 December 2007 13:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter Oh no it isn't! (couldn't resist!)
Admin  
#6 Posted : 18 December 2007 14:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stuart cross Oh yes it is!!! you've started something now Ron!!! Stuart
Admin  
#7 Posted : 18 December 2007 14:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fiona Cowan We're behind you! Fiona
Admin  
#8 Posted : 18 December 2007 16:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Oh no you're not! John
Admin  
#9 Posted : 18 December 2007 16:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stuart cross OH YES WE ARE!!! Stuart
Admin  
#10 Posted : 18 December 2007 16:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Doughnuts - My favourite Nuts Bob
Admin  
#11 Posted : 18 December 2007 17:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Newman Bob, hope you don't have an allergy. There should be a health warning on this site "may contain nuts or nut products" Oh yes there should ! Merv
Admin  
#12 Posted : 18 December 2007 19:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft Our local evening paper which has strong links with our local pantomime each year reported that 10,000 children had attended the panto at the venue which had decided to ban sweet hurling and no injuries had been reported but that two old ladies had complained that a toffee nearly hit them !!!!!!!!!!!!! Seems one complaint outweighs 10,000 no injury exposures. Perhaps lessons to old ladies in how to catch toffees or a toffee allowance (assuming no false teeth issues etc) would be a better response. The one bright light in all this was that the local paper quoted a Chartered Safety Practitioner as saying it was all nonsense and as a result the story head line put the story in its place as a nonsense item and not as a news item. So perhaps the message about sensible safety is getting through in a few places. We are booked for our local panto this weekend and my granddaughter had better get a toffee or I shall complain about mean minded managers etc.Watch this space. R
Admin  
#13 Posted : 19 December 2007 09:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Duell *The one bright light in all this was that the local paper quoted a Chartered Safety Practitioner as saying it was all nonsense and as a result the story head line put the story in its place as a nonsense item and not as a news item* Got a link, Richard? If it hasn't been already, that story deserves a nomination as a "Bonzer Conker".
Admin  
#14 Posted : 20 December 2007 12:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheila EJ Keogh why were old ladies at the panto? If they're used to going to pantos, they would know that sweets etc are chucked out into the audience. Perhaps they should've done their own risk assessment and gone to bingo or somewhere instead (no disrespect intended to the older generation)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.