Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 December 2007 09:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David J Jones
Good people,

I know this has been discussed in the past but I seek your learned thoughts in light of the application of Dangerous Driving charges (in England and Wales) where an accident is seen to have been caused where the driver had been using a mobile phone at the time of the accident and its use is determined as a contributory factor.

This is, of course, using a hand-held mobile, but I'm sure there are mutterings that if it is thought the driver was using a hands-free mobile at the time of the accident this situation could also attract a Dangerous Driving charge.

Having a robust Management of Occupational Road Risk in place which stresses the need to limit the use of hands free mobiles (all our vehicles are fitted with a "pukka" hands free kit) I was looking at totally banning their use.

What are your feelings on this matter, and do any of you have a similar blanket ban on mobile phone use even if hands free kit is fitted?

Regards,

David
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 December 2007 09:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
When the testing concerning concentration loss for hands free use has the biases eliminated I might pay more interest in them. Currently they look like the results of an experiment designed to give the answer desired.

Bob
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 December 2007 09:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister
Hi David, personal observation and experience tells me that having a phone conversation whilst driving is not a good mix. The bit about hand-held or hands-free to me is irrelevant - it is the attention being directed to the conversation that is the issue (men cannot multi-task!). I wonder whether this could be the basis for a PhD study.

I find it much easier to ignore the passengers talking than anyone on the other end of a phone if faced with a driving situation needing greater concentration. Furthermore, being able to recognise the approach of such a situation is severely reduced for me if on the phone.

I now never initiate a call whilst driving and very rarely answer any call. Personal choice.

That said, mobile phone use now habitual for most of the population and imposing a ban on driving/phoning is likely to be a futile exercise for any individual organisation. There are companies who have taken this decision but I suspect that whilst this may have reduced some call numbers the individual drivers will still follow their own choice on whether to answer or initiate private calls.

It will be interesting to hear from anyone who has direct experience of operating a ban to see whether it has had any affect on driving and accident statistics.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 December 2007 09:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy

Obviously, we have a mobile phone ban when driving unless bluetooth handsfree is fitted and used in the vehicle. We have a low, (almost nil) accident rate in vehicles so its hard to confirm if the policy has reduced accidents. Interestingly, I heard the news on Radio 2 this morning say that the punishment for getting caught using a mobile when driving was to be raised to 2 years in prison because most people are ignoring the ban. Might make a few more comply.

Holmezy
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 December 2007 10:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Hi Folks,

We have a no mobile while mobile policy, but this is honoured more in the breach than the observance, which is a constant source of irritation to me.

anything which distracts drivers should be actively discouraged by Policy; and its not just mobile phones, the number of people who apparently can't hold a conversation with their passengers without looking at them is frankly terrifying, the Police are terrible in this respect,

John
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 December 2007 10:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Occ road risk and mobile phones has, I would say, been generally well publicised by employers and generally observed "at work".

What I do often see though, is an increased use of mobies by the, white van man, mums on the school run, the fluffy pink dice brigade and my car looks faster than yours mob.
It is they who are the potential killers.

Are there any statistics yet that indicate that moby use whilst driving for work were contibutable to RTAs in UK?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 December 2007 10:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Looking at the number of police who both ignore the speed limit and use non-hands free when in control of a vehicle I think pots kettles and black need to be addressed first. If not then public reaction will be poor. Even chief constables seem to have the habit even though they head up road safety campaigns!

Bob
Admin  
#8 Posted : 20 December 2007 10:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham
David states that he finds it easier to ignore a passenger talking than someone on the hands-free phone. I find the opposite. How do you shut a passenger up if they persist in talking? In contrast to this I can always terminate the call on the mobile. The other party need not even know that I have terminated the call, as this might simply be that I have moved out of range. So no offence given.

How would the police respond if I claimed that accident was due to distraction by a voluble and non-responsive passenger?

And why just mobile phones. How often do I follow a vehicle, particularly at night, with a glowing SatNav screen. What distraction is this causing? Also what about that car ahead whose music I can actually feel, the volume is so loud? How can that drive be fully concentrating and aware of what is going on around him?

Chris
Admin  
#9 Posted : 20 December 2007 12:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin Forbes
The company i work for, has a ban on mobile phones whilst driving, even with handfree kits.

The exact instructions is upon entering a vehicle, employees are expected to switch off their mobile phones.

Martin
Admin  
#10 Posted : 20 December 2007 12:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brigham
How do they enforce it Martin?
Admin  
#11 Posted : 20 December 2007 12:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Excellent Brigham
Admin  
#12 Posted : 20 December 2007 12:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Hi Brigham,

I entirely agree with you, that is the point. Our lot don't even try, the person who introduced the no-mobile while mobile Policy would ring me from his car without any apparent qualms,

John
Admin  
#13 Posted : 20 December 2007 12:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin Coghill
Not a solution just a comment. It never fails to amaze me that all those who own a mobile phone (company issue or otherwise) seem to think that they are therefore so important that they cannot turn it off whilst driving, even with a hands free kit which I am not convinced is significantly better than non hands free - it gives an extra hand for that drink, or packet of crisps etc.
No-one is that important that they need to be contactable 24/7 - if you were you'd have people to field your calls for you.
Mobiles are an incidious part of modern society and I do not accept that they are essential, hence why I have never owned one. I have had company issue phones which remain switched off until I can safely answer and take any notes as needed.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 20 December 2007 13:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
What about those who call a driver with the knowledge the he / she is behind the wheel?
Admin  
#15 Posted : 20 December 2007 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham
Mobile phones are an "invidious part of modern life"?

I arranged for both my daughters, while in their late teens, to have mobile phones as a safety feature. We live in the country and they would often have to travel late in the evening along lonely country roads.

On the one occasion when one of their cars broke down our daughter was able to lock the doors and call for help. Had she not had a mobile phone she would have had to walk for about two miles along an unlit, narrow road.

"Invidious"? Not in my book! Technology is neutral. It is how we use it that matters. Standing in a railway carriage speaking loudly into a mobile phone so as to annoy the whole carriage is one thing. Speaking quietly into the phone so that even the person in the neighbouring seat is not disturbed is something else.

As a consultant who spends a great deal of time "on the road" (not necessarily driving) and whose clients often need to contact me for an urgent response I find the mobile phone invaluable.

Chris
Admin  
#16 Posted : 20 December 2007 13:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin Forbes
Robert:

The way we work with all our policies in this company works on a Observation / Opportunity for Imporvement card.

Therefore, in the event that an employee is seen using his phone whilst driving it is the duty of the person who observes this to report it, and believe it or not after heavily enforcing this system it is proving very successfull. We don't get many cards for the use of mobile phones whilst driving, whether that be down to the fact that few people are doing i couldnt say. However generally when its observed i think all employees will tend to report it.

On another note we recently had an observation card listing a contracted driver on-site using his mobile phone which i was impressed with. This was also taken seriously.

As far as handsfree comes, we request that employees switch off their phones, we do not enforce it.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 20 December 2007 13:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi
We have an "Engine on-Phone Off" policy. Ultimately, it is down to the organisation culture regarding its implementation, monitoring and enforcement.

We actively ask, when relevant whether someone(typically visitor to our site) responding to a telephone call is driving. If yes, we immediately stop the conversation with an appropraite message. We include "potential Hazard" reporting of instances where our employees have been using mobile phones which is a part and parcel of our "HSE Event" reporting systems and also can be a part of behaviour based safety observations.

The result is that our employees do not use mobile phones when driving. This has been the policy since the introduction of the law. We have not at all issued the hands free kits because in doing so, we would seem to be supporting use of hand free.

Admin  
#18 Posted : 20 December 2007 14:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Jay
to quote you, "The result is that our employees do not use mobile phones when driving."

How can you be 100% sure of that? It's not possible to measure.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 20 December 2007 15:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi
If we wanted to, we could "measure it" by monitoring mobile phone records, (subject to terms & conditions in employment contracts). We actually do not.

However, it is possible to get a handle on the culture of the organisation--and this aspect -employees at all levels, from the top management up to lower levels is applicable for all sorts of compliance issues, not strictly related to use of mobile phones when driving.

Do we actually measure everything possible for health and safety--no, but we do carry out robust inspections and audits, and have an excellent potential hazard/near miss/incident/accident reporting system and have a mature behaviour based safety observation programme.

Admin  
#20 Posted : 21 December 2007 08:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David J Jones
Many thanks for all your responses, some interestings points and comments.

Have a good Christmas and New Year.

David
Admin  
#21 Posted : 21 December 2007 12:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By anon1234
Jay,

not sure how looking at phone records will tell you whether they were using the phone whilst driving - all it will tell you is when they made a call and for how long. It won't pick up incoming calls or be able to link to driving - unless you have developed some state of the art technical solutions.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 21 December 2007 14:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By water67.
Hi, some interesting views. For me the bottom line is the fact that it is a dangerous practice. Monitoring.. of course it isn't possible to check everyone all the time. I personally have my tel on whilst driving.. if i get a call I pull over. If i cant pull over i ignore the call and catch up later when I can pull over: Called self discipline or policing or whatever we wish to call it. Seems to me that individual responsibility is the key to this and all other H&S issues. of course i am not naive to believe everyone will comply..hence the need for some monitoring.. but for me a mix of information, education, instruction, monitoring and supervision is the key..hmmm know where have I heard/seen that before?

Cheers merry and safe Xmas to one and all.







Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.