Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 10 January 2008 19:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Ling
I have been sent this story today with a suggestion that it should be circulated to everyone. I am always wary of these stories as they usually turn out to be urban myths. I can't find this on the internet, can anyone on this site help, is this fact or myth.

"Are u talking while your phone is charging???
>
> Don't charge your mobile the whole night and don't keep it near by
> important
>
> Never, ever answer a cell phone while it is being RECHARGED!!
>
> A few days ago, a person was recharging his cell phone at home. Just at that time a call Came in and he answered it with the instrument still connected to the outlet. After a few seconds electricity flowed into the cell phone unrestrained and the young man was thrown to the ground with a heavy thud.
> His parents rushed to the room only to find him unconscious, with a weak heartbeat and burnt fingers. He was rushed to the nearby hospital, but was pronounced dead on arrival. Cell phones are a very useful modern invention. However, we must be aware that it can also be an instrument of death.
>
> Never use the cell phone while it is hooked to the electrical outlet!"
Admin  
#2 Posted : 10 January 2008 22:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Haynes
A simple 'Google' of "person was recharging his cell phone at home" throws up a number of sites that say it as an urban myth.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 January 2008 01:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
But there have been problems with faulty mains chargers causing fires. Please do not leave chargers switched on unattended, whether connected to a cell-phone or not.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 11 January 2008 08:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Ling
Thanks for your responses and have now managed to find references to it using the suggested google search.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 11 January 2008 08:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Garry Homer
This accident, if true, would require a failure of the double insulated charger (class 2 insulation) and other factors. Failure of the charger insulation alone would not result in sufficient current to flow to kill. The person would need to be in contact with some other earthed metal to create the circuit. Standing on a carpet in an upper floor room would probably be sufficient insulation to prevent sufficient current to flow through the body although it could still be painful!

Class 2 insulation has been widely used for decades and is often the method used to ensure safety in hazardous situations. Most devices in the home, office and workplace now rely on this level of insulation. Everything with the figure of 8 connector for example plus others. If class 2 insulation cannot be relied upon, then we are all in trouble and it will not be restricted to mobile phone chargers.

Just another silly story IMHO.

Garry
Admin  
#6 Posted : 11 January 2008 09:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4
Ron, could you point me to a reference about fires caused by chargers.

I ask because four years ago I attended a fire course where the lecturer (ex fireman) stated that chargers were the most common cause of fires in domestic premises.

I tried to research this after the lecture but couldn't find any evidence of at all and came to the conclusion he was making it up. If you can point me to your source it would be very helpful.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 11 January 2008 09:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AHS
On a similar theme can anyone reference me a fire related accident on a petrol forecourt due to use of a mobile phone.

Personally with the amount of ventilation I think there is far more chance of an ignition source related to a static electricity discharge.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 11 January 2008 10:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Garry Homer
While mobile phones are a particular interest of mine I have never managed to pin this story down to a particular incident. However, I believe the fire authorities at one point considered it possible that if a mobile phone was dropped causing the internal battery to short circuit, then enough energy may be released to ignite the fumes.

There seems to have been a relaxation in restrictions so even this possibility may have been discarded.

Admin  
#9 Posted : 11 January 2008 11:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adam Worth


This has been covered in depth before - I don't have time to search for the thread tho.

Basically the ignition level for petrol is well above the level produced by a mobile phone. An interesting point is that the radius of risk from a phone mast is about 2m (See BS6656) and so can be mounted on the roof!

Most explosions of this sort occur overseas where it much more common for people to sit in their car whilst refuelling. This leads to build up of potential that is discharged when they get out and touch the nozzle, thus causing a spark and a big bang! (search utube for some good egs!)

HOWEVER - DSERA regs state that in an area with a potential explosive atmosphere all sources of ignition should be removed.
On Top Tier COMAH sites with DSEAR areas that I have worked on this means all electronic equipment that is not Ex must be left at the door - the reason, dropped phones or other equip can cause a spark between the battery terminals.
Ex phones give off the same power but have inbuilt circuits to prevent this discharge.

Maybe petrol stations should be stricter?? :)

Sorry that's a really rushed reply
Admin  
#10 Posted : 11 January 2008 11:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant
The alternate reason floating about amongst people in the industry is that the inducted interference from cellphones can affect the metering circuitry on digital fuel pumps, as it uses pulse-counting. Blowing up the forecourt is not the issue, it's paying the right amount for your fuel. The NFPA (US) has reported no cases of fires at gas stations attributed to the signals from cellphones in the last 10 years.


Yes, a faulty phone or one being beaten to bits by a baseball bat can generate a spark - but statistically the chances of a spark from static discharge or faults with the vehicle's own electrical system are thousands of times more likely. There are no signs at the pumps saying "no shellsuits"... except maybe in Hammersmith...
Admin  
#11 Posted : 11 January 2008 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Duell
On my Dip 1 course we were shown the video of the CCTV footage of the fire that led to the "mobile phones cause fires at petrol stations" story.

It shows a woman sitting in her car, talking on her mobile phone, while her car is being filled. She ends the conversation, puts the phone down, and slides out of the car seat - generating a static spark which ignites fuel vapour. And yet the phone got the blame!
Admin  
#12 Posted : 11 January 2008 13:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
I could make some enquiries to get the make and model of the 'phone charger, but I would be wary of naming on this Forum.

As for the Petrol Forecourt issue- pure urban myth. The only risk arises if the battery was to fall off or out and the contacts were to strike a surface to cause incendive spark. I know of no such incident though.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 11 January 2008 13:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By p winter
There are a few clues in the original posting that this originated in the USA: cell phone, hooked up, electrical outlet. Their domestic voltage is lower than ours (and so less likely to electricute) so this very story seems pretty unlikely. I would guess a hoax.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 11 January 2008 15:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By alan brotherton
Re - petrol forecourt risks.
I remember Shell issued a report of mobile phone related accidents on their forecourts some time ago. Accidents do happen but fortunately not to frequently. Most serious reported at that time was severe burning to legs and hip when (if I recall correctly)a phone started ringing in customer's pocket and ignited petrol vapours while filling up.
Maybe a search on Shell under safety issues may bring up the report.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 11 January 2008 15:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Dale
On checking Snopes.com the following information can be found:
We understand that there is an email, purportedly official Shell communication, circulating which describes various incidents that are supposed to have occurred as a result of mobile phones ringing while at a retail station.

Please be advised that the email in question does NOT originate from Shell Malaysia and we are unable to confirm any of the incidents quoted.

Snopes.com also state that there is no verifiable evidence of any incidents at filling stations which can be attributed to mobile phones.

Ian Dale
Admin  
#16 Posted : 12 January 2008 00:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
Alan the whole Shell safety alert thing was an urban myth which unfortunately sustained some fleeting credibility. As I recall, even the HSE fell into that particular trap. A few red faces at the time.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 12 January 2008 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MP Grayson
The world according to me.

This is my personal opinion and tuppence worth.

1. Mobile phone charger.

Accepts alternating current (ac) at 230-240 (ish) volts (USA IIOv ac). Puts out direct current (dc) to your mobile at between 9 to 3 volts. Unless someone can convince me that there is a whacking great capacitor in the mobile, then I think that you are more at risk licking a 9v battery. See previous myth, Oh and er don't forget to re-cycle you batteries.

2. Fires from chargers.

Even when the phone is disconnected from the charger, if it is plugged in and the socket on, then it is still converting 230v ac to 5v dc.
Remember, a-by product of burning electricity is heat. The oxygen is always there, the phone provides the heat, the pile of newspapers thrown onto it provides the fuel.
HEY PRESTO. You have the fire triangle. And we all know what comes next.

3. The fire in the petrol station.

Not too sure on this but I heard that a car manufacturer once recalled all/some of its cars and fitted a bonding lead of sorts to their vehicles fuel system after a certain incident involving static build ups.
Picture this. Lady gets out of her car, nice velor seats and a few man made fibres in her blouse = hair standing on end with static charge.
She touches the car or pump. Static that has build up in her and her clothes (combined maybe with static naturally generated by a flowing liquid) now finds the easiest way to earth (sensible shoes see). Which is jumping (arcing), straight through the fuel vapour to the fuel nozzle.

Heat and oxygen and fuel (vapour) = D,OH.

Crack on.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 14 January 2008 13:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tracey Kelly
This has been covered in the I Chem E Safety & Loss Prevention bulletins, where even Trevor Kletz (the leading expert in Process Safety) was fooled by the "Shell" urban myth and urged all chemical engineers to warn everyone about the dangers.

Mythbusters also covered this (it was repeated last week on Discovery Channel) http://mythbusters-wiki....de+14%3A+Myths+Revisited Episode 14, myth #3

This reminds me of the chemical site that wanted to build a petrol station, but couldn't comply with the Explosive Atmosphere regulations without getting everyone to remove their engines before filling the fuel tank.....in the end they just moved the site boundary!!!!

It's generally agreed that it's the static you need to watch out for.

Tracey
Admin  
#19 Posted : 17 January 2008 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
To Geoff4b. If you e-mail me with your address I can fwd some info on charger faults.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 17 January 2008 14:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T
I have always thought the mobiles causing fire at petrol stations etc was complete rubbish (I used to - a long time ago - work for BT and they said it was rubbish and that was before O2 was sold off).

However - I received a video yesterday taken fromm cctv cameras which shows a guy at a forecourt with his petrol tanker. He gets on top of the tanker and because it is quite dark he uses the light from his mobile to read some instructions. He becomes a ball of flame and flies off the top of the tanker. I am very sceptical about this video but it is very realistic. Has anyone else seen this? Is there any verification of its authenticity?
Admin  
#21 Posted : 17 January 2008 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Seen the video clip, looks real, and if it is then the petroleum company which is clearly displayed has certainly kept quiet about it, even though it appears to be South American
Not too sure about the 'phone light though. I thought that they were LEDs with no heat emission.
The clip is real enough to let you see the residual (petroleum??) vapour being ignited at the detached delivery hose coupling.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 17 January 2008 15:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By M Forbes
Complete myth,

Mythbusters did an article on this. They filled a caravan with petrol. Place 100 mobile phones in it and rung all the mobile phones simultaneously, nothing happened.

However when the man that was wearing nylon trousers touched a piece of metal attached to the inside of the caravan, it blew up.

This is a complete myth.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 17 January 2008 17:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JonH
There was a case a couple of years ago in Manchester. A guy was filling up with Unleaded whilst using his mobile. Suddenly the petrol vapour ignited, setting fire to the sleeve of his jacket. In a panic he batted out the flames, jumped in his car and sped off. By driving off without paying, this triggered a police call from the forecourt, and a police car was dispatched. As the driver was heading down one of the main A roads on the outskirts of Manchester, his coat reignited, and in a panic, he wound the window down and flapped his arm about to try to extinguish the flames. By this time, the police had caught up with him and were following just behind. They quickly overtook him, pulled him over and arrested him for carrying a fire arm...
Admin  
#24 Posted : 17 January 2008 17:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DRB
JonH, that's a classic. Well done for brightening up my day!!
Admin  
#25 Posted : 23 January 2008 01:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dana
To Ron Hunter, can you please also email me the information on charger faults that you have forwarded to Geoff2b. My email is dana.budzinski@woodside.com.au Many thanks. Dana


Admin  
#26 Posted : 23 January 2008 09:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
Surely, on a garage forecourt, there is a source of high energy sparks, very hot surfaces etc - they are commonly known as CARS and CAR ENGINES. Without any data, just taking a wild guess, think that these things probably have higher spark energy than any mobile phones............
Admin  
#27 Posted : 23 January 2008 10:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By M Forbes
Compare between cars which have a "SPARK PLUG" or mobile phones. . . . . . which don't?
Admin  
#28 Posted : 31 March 2008 13:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Dayoub
Hi, I joined your website so I could chime in on this discussion.

I've blogged 50+ fires caused by chargers on my website http://exactproductsinc.com/WordPress/?cat=21

Several of the fires were caused by cell phone chargers. None were fatal.

I think all those cases were from unattended chargers, which -- as some previous posters have said -- is a bigger general risk.

I've developed a power strip to be mounted above charging stations (for tools and other rechargable devices) which would shut off the rechargers at the first sign of smoldering. I haven't found a manufacturer to build it yet.

Mike Dayoub
SmokeShutoff.com
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.