Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert.
We have just assessed a company as one of our approved suppliers.
Their operators members of the BDA and have CSCS cards which we advised as not being adequate enough to fulfill safety knowledge and awareness required whilst working on retail petrol filling stations. (SPA petroleum) They are a good conciencious company and we want to give them a chance. So what we intend to is take them under our wing, site manage the works with one of our own experienced and qualified guys. Then they gradually get their SPA cards
It was while our intentions were being discussed that I realised that if it were a construction site, their attendance would be a definate no-no if they didn't have the CSCS card.
We've overcome the "obstacle" by sensible agreement.
Why can't the const (MCG) industry (in general) do the same?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Michael Battman
I think in general it does take a reasonable stance on this. OK there are a few pedantic site managers, but in general a sensible approach is taken.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
17 years old CSCS 1/2 hour behind a PC and enrolled on an NVQ - hey presto CSCS card and now safe to work on a construction site!
If the company concerned do not do SPA / CCNSG etc for this site are they really competent to do this work? What level of commitment does it show from the contractor?
Also are you competent to supervise their work?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert.
My point is Dave.
Irrespective of how old you are!
The hazards that are present on when working on a filling station are infinately different to that on a construction site. It's not the contractors level of operational competence thats questionable, but their perception of hazards in a different environment.
That is why they will be supervised by a person who is competent and is knowledgable of the associated hazards.
They, the contractors, I suppose, like many others may think that the CSCS card fits all.
It certainly does not.
Also, although I didn't mention it, the CCNSG, passport to safety is not in any way related to filling stations, it is general safety and not sector / disciplne related.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Michael Battman
Dave,
You give the example of "A 17-year old with 1/2 an hour behind a PC and signed up for an NVQ" being deemed fit to be on site.
I think that is very unfair, irrespective of how easy the multiple choice questions are; I do not believe any 17-year old (or older for that matter) without some prior training could pass the test.
The situation is far better than when life guards in Cornwall, once the season was over, found jobs in construction until the warm weather returned - with no training. A situation that was common 10-years ago.
It is far from perfect, but at least construction now has a base level of personal safety on sites.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Yes I know mate,
Our guys have them all CSCS / SPA / CCNSG some for Petro and a different one for food and also manufacturing.
What's the point in having an in house competence based system and a Guidance book Code of Practice for contractors working on filling stations, which they should know, if you do not follow it! (but then again this code allows you to do that.)
What you going to do the next time another contractor who is not SPA, says well you done it for them?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Michael,
I'm not knocking the system mate but this can happen, just because you have a CSCS card doesn't mean nowt as far as safety on site goes.
As you are well aware its not competence based.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
Michael
I was on a fairly large site in north London just 4 months ago. One guy spoke a smattering of English, the rest (approximately 10 others) had none. There was nothing at all on site that gave me any confidence that H&S was being considered. The electrical equipment was 240v, there was a very poor condition unstable tower scaffold, an ancient FLT with no docs, no signs, no welfare facilities and absolutely no documentation.
You think sites have improved in the last ten years - believe me some have got a lot worse.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TomP
If they are land drillers and holders of CSCS cards, as long as the CSCS cards are for land drilling, they must be either holders of a land drilling NVQ or be enrolled for it. This does involve competency.
Many in issue are still under grandfather rights however or not specific to land drilling, so check if they are enrolled with the NVQ and the CSCS is for land drilling.
As for CSCS being mandatory for construction sites, this isn't the case. Many sites don't enforce CSCS cards for just the reason you allude to - it doesn't make you competent.
The CSCS card is a good demonstration of site competency and many contractors see this as an easy opt out of ensuring their suppliers are competent. Doesn't check they have sufficient insurance, have done risk assessments etc. but the recent requirement for an NVQ improves the sitauation re competency.
In such cases as the use of land drillers, who are often self employed and won't have written RAs, SSOW etc., you do need to make sure they work under your safe systems of work etc. In my experience the problem with viewing the fuel station as the main hazard, which is correct, often takes the eyes away form the state of the rig, standard of erection etc. This could be just as hazardous as the site being drilled.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert.
TomP
My sentiments exactly.
I / we will not be telling them how to operate their rigs but merely to advise on the strict protocols that are required on filling stations.
You also, quite rightly, say that many don't have written SSOWs RAs etc. In this case they will and will be working under our safety banner so that they focus on their job.
You may also be aware that (land) drilling equipment comes in all different shapes and sizes and with differing degrees of what is acceptably maintained.
As I previously said, their competence is not at question, its the perception of hazard in a different scenario, which is vastly different from a const site.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gerry Marchant
Hi gents...just reading through this thread made me think
We are a construction company, not an MCG, yet a lot of our clients expect our operatives to hold CSCS cards as they have seen them advertised as a good thing!!!...when I explained that all our operatives are trained in their relevant trade and all have attended an appropriate H&S awareness course within the last five years and passed an end of course assessment and I can provide evidence of this they then re-considered..the requirements are the same for CSCS...I do not believe that the CSCS scheme is the B all of everything...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
If they have attended a h&s awareness course it's more than a lot of CSCS card holders have done.
I keep telling this story to show how ineffective the CSCS scheme is. We carried out a site audit of a MCG member and there wasn't a trade CSCS card on the site other than the plant drivers.
Why? Quote: Because we wouldn't get a house built if we insisted on CSCS cards.
Yet it was/is the MCG who started/pushed/pursued this scheme.
Please, someone convince me there are some benefits?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By HWilson
You think CSCS/CPCS is bad - try dealing with EUS which is the Utilities equivalent!
I have the misfortune to deal with all three on a regular basis and it usually results in me finding a quiet dark corner of the office and either banging my head against the wall or rocking and moaning for extended periods of time.
The only saving grace is that they have all finally agreed to acknowledge each other which is some movement in the right direction.
I do agree with the previous posters that an hours touch screen test does not = competence, I was going to say that as part of an NVQ it is ok but I also have the misfortune to be in charge of the gas NVQs at work which is another thread in itself. I wouldn't want anyone to get the wrong idea about competence in the gas industry but, really, getting guys who have worked in the industry for 20 years to pose holding a broom does rather take the biscuit...
H
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Bramall
It's not just having a CSCS card which is the important thing.
It's having appropriate levels of cards.
All our staff who attend sites have a CSCS card & a CCNSG Passport to safety and EUS Water Hygiene, 21 in total. The CSCS cards are broken down as follows :-
Gold (Skilled)- 12
White ( Ancillary & Trainee)- 6
Yellow (Visitor)- 3
You would not expect everyone on site to have the skilled card just as you would not expect everyone to be ancillary operatives or trainees.
For any company the should be a suitable mix.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jmc
Hi
CSCS; money making scheme.
12 indians 4 romanians 2 polish in this country a month. First thing they are told to do by friends is call 0870850**** to get a job on the construction site. YES this is the number for CSCS now they get a book read it for 2, 3 weeks they go and take the test. If they pass first time which most of these guy`s did they can work on most construction sites, and My site insist`s on CSCS or you dont get on. these guy`s are steel fixers, concrete gangs, joiners, labourer`s, etc.
for test and card a bargain at £42.50 for these guy`s
but a nightmare for us safety advisors
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Barry Cooper
Some time ago I reluctantly agreed to accept CSCS safety test and card as a requirement to work on our site (paper mill). Before that I would accept the safety Passport or the SPA passport, but now I am having second thoughts, because the CSCS is not H&S training. It is a 40 minute questionnaire, and no two way feedback like on a training course. I am now considering withdrawing the CSCS as an acceptable standard.
Although the passport schemes are not perfect they are much better than CSCS
I am amazed that the construction industry accept this card.
Barry
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TomP
I echo everyone’s concerns here. Many construction companies are using the CSCS card as the be all and end all but it has limitations.
If you look at the definition of a competent worker under CDM it relates to time served, continuing training including elf and safety, review and assessment. CSCS are trying to address this with the increasing use of NVQs and CPD for the more senior cards but I don’t agree with their claim it is a proof of competency.
We mainly have them because it is a commercial necessity to get on some sites but we supplement the card with more suitable training, toolbox talks etc. and our own path towards competency.
Interestingly the only site I have recently attended where a big sign said ‘No CSCS card, No work!!!’ no one wanted to see my nice new shiny card. Even the site manager wasn’t bothered.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert.
By all accounts, some safety awareness is better than none and I personally see the CSCS system as a base starting point for safety and not neccesarily be soley for the construction industry. Maybe it's time that the MCG (?) realised that other safety passports, and the training that accompanies them ,irrespective of sector, are far superior and beneficial to the industry as a whole and that the holders have a far better knowledge and appreciation of hazard and risk. Examples being the SPA(petroleum)or utility industries passports. I can't comment on foreign nationals and their levels of safety competence, but from a previous posting it appears that it is only viewed as a ticket to get in the door and nothing more.
I'm absolutely certain that the contractors we will be using will be alot more appreciative of safety and SSOWs after working for us than they would ever get if working for an employer who only requires a CSCS card.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve T.
JMC - Youa re as cynical as me.
PS I have been involved in H&S for 25 years, many on construction sites,am CMIOSH etc and have trained many people in all aspects of H&S - i am taking my test soon to keep my CSCS card. A money making scheme it is.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.