Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 01 February 2008 13:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By angelae
Hoping someone can help me out here.
We (myself and our Occ Physician) have discovered today that we have an engineering workshop on site where they hand paint with paint containing isocyanates. Having looked at the MSDS for these paints they're respiratory sensitisers.
I already carry out annual lung function screening on these workers, but the area they are working in is open for all to enter, no respiratory protection etc.
Can anyone please advise if the risk from exposure to isocyanates would be any less because they're not spray painting? I've only ever come across people spray painting them, so this is a new one for me! Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Admin  
#2 Posted : 01 February 2008 14:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Angela

The risk will be less than spray painting but will depend on the nature of the isocyanate in the paint. Most isocyanates these days are pre-polymerised to reduce their vapour pressure (and, thus, the amount of evaporation). Check your MSDSs for the concentration of free isocyanate; it should be very low (probably less than 0.1%). Of the isocynates, only toluene di-isocyanate has a vapour pressure high enough for the pure substance to generate hazardous atmospheric concentrations purely by evaporation.

Paul
Admin  
#3 Posted : 01 February 2008 14:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
In COSHH, you have to consider routes of exposure. Spraying Isocyanates is a particular issue as you are open to two routes ie

- skin / eye contact
- inhalation

The nub of this is that the act of spraying (ie using compressed air to disperse and then project this onto the item surface) exposes the operator to both routes without the need for direct contact.

Therefore, for hand painting, the inhalation route would be unlikely.

HSE info suggests that hand application may not give rise to exposure http://www.hse.gov.uk/re...hsl_pdf/2005/hsl0560.pdf

However, I would be cautious. To reassure yourself could you get a measurement(s) made to rule out inhalation?

What about other solvents present which may have a high vapour pressure (and so give off vapour which may be inhaled).

As a minimum I would go for ventilation (preferably LEV). Incidentally why not talk to the paint manufacturer?

Hope this helps.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 01 February 2008 14:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By angelae
Thanks for the advice. I'm planning to speak to the manufacturer next week and I have advised that they need to get some monitoring done.
Angela
Admin  
#5 Posted : 01 February 2008 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham
Angela

It isn't just respiratory exposure that you need to be concerned about. There is now evidence that skin exposure to isocyanates, and particularly MDI, can cause sensitization leading to asthma as well as allergic contact dermatitis.

What other constituents are there in the paint? If, as I suspect, it is solvent based, then there is a risk of skin uptake unless appropriate precautions have been taken.

I would assume that gloves are being worn, but you will need to check that these are appropriate. This is not quite as simple as might appear. Manufacturer's published performance data for chemical protective gloves is not adequate for the selection and use of such gloves, since it is based on a laboratory test according to a flawed standard. You will need to consider factors such as concomittant degradation, temperature, flexing, etc., all of which can significantly affect glove performance.

Chris
Admin  
#6 Posted : 01 February 2008 15:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By angelae
Hi Chris
Thanks for this. The paint also contains lead chromate, xylene, ethylbenzene to name a few! Not very nice stuff, but they tell me there is no alternative because it's used for bouys on the water and other less potent stuff would not last.
Yes, gloves are being used, but I've lareadys advised I don't think they're up to the job (some form thin vinyl).
Admin  
#7 Posted : 01 February 2008 15:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham
Angela

Vinyl is totally inappropriate as a glove material for the mixture you describe. Nitrile will perform slightly better, but I have studies showing permeation breakthrough with nitrile gloves in just a few minutes.

Wearing the wrong glove can be worse than wearing no glove at all. The occlusion underneath the glove reduces the skin barrier so that any chemical inside the glove (and with thin vinyl this breakthrough will happen in seconds) can penetrate the skin and cause real damage.

Given the constituents of the paint I feel that there is a very significant risk of damage to health which needs addressing urgently.

If you feel you would like to discuss this give me a call on 01386 832 311

Chris
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.