Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 13 February 2008 19:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Al.. Has anyone had experience of fire protection systems which are supposed to create an environment in which fires cannot start by reducing oxygen levels via the continuous addition of nitrogen to the air? Claims are made that people can enter and work in these areas at any time. I hear that they have been used in libraries (or at least in their archives). Confined space entry permit anyone? Al
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 February 2008 09:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ashley Wood These systems are very good but there is a time limit on continuous exposure, I believe it is 6 hours. However, I have spoken to people who have been in an N2 rich atmosphere and after an hour they started to feel a little lite headed. I think that there is a case for confined entry type classification to be considered. One of the draw backs with this system is the loss of the N2 generator when the system is being maintained. To guarantee continued protection you must specify a back up unit that would take over when the primary unit is down. I believe there are several libraries being protected with this type of system, the latest being in Oxford for the British Library. Only one manufacture exists so I don't suppose the moderators will mind me mentioning them! WAGNER located in Cambridge. If more info needed contact direct.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 February 2008 10:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Konstanty Budkiewicz Al.. I have no formal experience of breathing Nitrogen. I searched the Web under "effects of breathing nitrogen" and found a number of sites: they were mostly concerned with diving. However, the following link is the equivalent of an MSDS and should be of use to you. It features the PERMIT TO WORK scenario that you querried: http://intox.org/databan...mical/nitrogen/cie56.htm Kon CMIOSH
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 February 2008 16:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steven n Nitrogen is regularly used to purge tanks/vessels and it has always been my understanding that it is a case of two breaths and you're dead. It is commonly used in electrical switch rooms to extinguish fires where there is easy exit and a control on entry.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 February 2008 16:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Blunt I believe that these systems are designed to take the oxygen concentration below 15%, to extinguish the fire. However, I believe that they are also designed to keep the oxygen level above 12.5%, which will not harm people in a very short exposure. Hence the fire is extinguished but not the people! Jane
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 February 2008 17:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ashley Wood yes, its all about oxygen reduction and not elimination! I believe they do something similar in aircraft hence the reason why you feel sleepy on long hall flights, Myth or fact I do not know for sure. Anyone out there know?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 February 2008 19:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Al.. Thanks to all for the information. I see that a supplier recommends that people can work in the areas protected by low oxygen levels down to 13 percent providing that they have undergone a health check. Some quoted symptoms of oxygen depletion are 21 to 14 percent Increasing pulse rate, tiredness 14 to 11 percent Physical movement and intellectual performance becomes difficult 11 to 8 percent Possibility of headaches, dizziness and fainting after a fairly short period of time 8 to 6 percent Fainting within a few minutes, resuscitation possible if carried out immediately 6 to 0 percent Fainting almost immediate, death or severe brain damage I guess that you will want to know that there are robust arrangements in place to prevent the oxygen content going below 13 percent. Will those robust arrangements there will not then be a foreseeable risk of an unbreathable atmosphere and no confined space. Looks a smart idea. Why has no one thought of it before? Al
Admin  
#8 Posted : 15 February 2008 08:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kenneth Patrick Because you need robust arrangements it will be a Confined Space. This is a general principle.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.