Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 February 2008 21:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 A completely new subject to me. Could anyone source any idiots guides or basic works or information on dust migration, travel distances of dust, size of pathogens such as salmonella etc capable of attaching themselves to dust. Basically I'm trying to find out how far or if wind-borne pathogens could travel short distances of up to 200m and what size dust particles and wind-speeds are involved. Thanks
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 February 2008 10:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Blenkharn Its a huge and highly complex problem. Aerobiology is often dismissed as a simple and straightforward issue but is really very complex. What if the source of the pathogens you anticipate? And why Salmonella? It's not a respiratory pathogen. If you are worried about fall-out from air onto foods, cover the food or protect the environment. If its a general health issue, consider also the 'normal' flora of air, and the problem of fungal material that can illicit allergic respiratory symptoms that are exacerbated by exposure to other respiratory irritants, including dusts. Dust particles fall out of still air at a rate that is dependent on their mass. Smaller particles remain suspended for far longer periods, particularly in turbulent air. Droplets rather than dry dusts are the most common source of micro-organisms in air - but really does depend on your circumstances. Droplets may carry micro-organisms and these can remain suspended almost indefinately in turbulent air as evaporation reduces them to micronuclei. Even with significant pathogens, dilution helps considerably. Bets approach is as thorough review of your situation, and most probably direct sampling of air. This would need to be done on a number of different occasions to take accout of sampling error, and background variation due to season and weather conditions. Usual approach is to sample across a site and the circumferentially to evaluate what you are shedding to the environment at large and what you pick up from upwind sources. Feel free to get in touch if you want to discuss in detail. Ian
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 February 2008 10:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 Thanks for the response Ian. 1)I'm looking for tables showing distances dust can be carried taking into account height, wind speed and size of the dust. 2) The size of pathogens such as salmonella but not limited to just that one. 3) If pathogens need to be attached to dust to become airbourne and/or can they become airborne by themselves. I appreciate the topic is highly complicated but as mentioned, I'm looking for something that will provide some basics on the subject. Thanks
Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 February 2008 11:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Blenkharn Geoff I very much doubt that the data you seek is available in the public domain, most of it will be in the relevant textbooks and journals, and as a microbiologist dealing on occasions with aerial dispersion of pathogens and methods of containment I must say its not a very exciting topic so much of the data is now quite old - funding for further research is scarce but the data is stil valid. For what its worth, an individual Salmonella cell is about 0.5 x 2 micron Still puzzled about your concerns of Salmonella. Are you worried about an animal rearing facility, or perhaps fallout from sewage treatment. If that is the case, then bacteria may be a convenient marker but the real concern will include virus particles that are at least an order of magnitude smaller and behave completely differently in air. Ian
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.