Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 February 2008 20:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Darmody Colleagues Advice please Scenario Notifiable project office refurbishment approx total £500k . All players appointed every thing goes to plan project finishes on schedule. However, delays start in respect of one of the contractors failing to supply the operational /maintenance manuals & certificates for the H&S File. Six months on following correspondence, telephone calls and a meeting with the contractor and still no documents forthcoming. Client currently holding back £6k owing for the contractor in question. (note: Client is also Principal Contractor). What are your thoughts to resolve this issue? I think there are potential liabilities!!! I believe there are both contractual and statutory remedies eg CDM. I am just after some sound practical advice from those of you who have experience in these matters. Any advice welcome Mark Darmody CMIOSH Dip2.OSH LCG
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 February 2008 08:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MAK this is a common scenario and unfortunately the powers that be did nothing to improve things when the regulations changed. Options - stop chasing the contractor for this information. someone somewhere is incurriung costs that they couldnt have allowed for. meanwhile you have a site presumably in operation without maintenance information. - Advise the client to use the 6k fee to hire another party to compile a key manual and chase down copies of orginal information. - Advise the client to pursue sub Contractor through legal channels and to claim costs back. Based on the information the duty was on both the client and the Principal Contractor to manage the production and handover of this information in a timeously fashion, and they didnt, or did they?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 28 February 2008 09:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel You are not holding back enough money!!!! You should highligh H&S non conformance conditions in your contract paperwork as in most cases non conformance only appears to deal with quality, production etc which is a great failing
Admin  
#4 Posted : 28 February 2008 09:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Fully agree with Bob. Clients and contractors should ensure that the financial sanctions for failure to deliver File information are sufficient to ensure pain if it is not done. Ensure it is in the contract and then make sure it is delivered. The late delivery of information is the bane of any CDMC's life. I still struggle sometimes weeks after the event - normally when the financial penalties are too low or non existent. As these are O&M manuals then it should theoretically be possible to get these from the original supplier or manufacturer - Try this route but ensure you keep cost information for a contract claim in addition to the deduction for non delivery. Bob
Admin  
#5 Posted : 28 February 2008 09:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MAK a small query to the Bob's above, how do you know the total value of the subcontractors work? how do you know 6k wasnt a sufficient margin of the fee to impact on the company concerned?
Admin  
#6 Posted : 28 February 2008 10:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis MAK Point taken. I was trying to make the general point that the retention figure does need to equate to a reasonable percentage of the contract value. Remember that the contract is however with the PC and the retention is against him and not a small subcontractor. It is up to the PC to ensure the transfer of liabilities and penalties. In this instance with Client and PC being identical persons the logic has to be applied in a manner conducive to the contract and its value. It is a reason however for the client and PC to be separate as the claim is more easily managed from the client viewpoint. Bob
Admin  
#7 Posted : 28 February 2008 17:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Darmody Thank you all for your valuable comments appreciated! Mark
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.