Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 March 2008 10:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Melanie Farrow as a London Borough we are looking at the need for the provision and use of defibrillators (along with all the necessary training) in our main council buildings under our wellbeing agenda but are meeting with some opposition from our insurers. I would really appreciate any information/comments you can offer on this subject if your employees use this equipment, e.g. Process, how you dealt with insurance, who your insurer is, are you self insured, suitable staff, payments to staff, where was equipment purchased from and sited, what training provider did you use etc. If you haven’t yet ventured into this area, do you have any other arrangements in place for resuscitation other than First Aiders in buildings
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 March 2008 10:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Melanie, I heard you the first time! Mitch (on a Friday)
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 March 2008 11:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By 247hero 3 times here and 3 times in the members forum... is there an echo...echo...echo...
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 March 2008 12:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Melanie, I don't understand why your insurers are opposed to your initiative. Challenge them to explain the basis for their stance and ask them their opinion on you as a public body failing to have in place up to date life safety equipment that is designed to be foolproof. Advice from the experts in this field is to provide defibs in all places where large numbers of people gather. I hope that your insurers attitude is merely one uninformed individual, rather than a company policy.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 March 2008 15:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dr. Will Andrews Melanie, I agree with David, liability to organisations with properly installed AED programmes is less than without AEDs. The trick is to get the programme 1. overseen and signed-off by doctors as recommended by the UK Resus Council and 2. to have all the other elements you asked about, hardware, maintenance, training, admin. help included in your programme by a fully-insured specialist in this area. This shouldn't work out any more expensive than doing it yourself. Small plug at the end, I started a specialist organisation specifically to do all this and would be delighted to answer any further questions. wa@wellbeing1st.com
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 March 2008 20:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By RP Just for info, if any public building gets more then 500 visitors per day then you may qualify from free defibs...British Heart foundation for more... To justify the costs of such a provision you would need to look at any records where having a defib may have helped...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.