Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cakey
Hi, if anyone could assist with the following COSHH/RPE situation I would be most grateful.
A graffiti removal gang apply a product by brush on to an affected area, allow it to react and then power wash the graffiti off. They currently use a polycarbonate full-face visor and disposable P2 valved disposable half mask respirator. (Not chosen by me I must add)
I have been advised that in order to correctly select the appropriate RPE, monitoring of the atomised product should take place. The CHIP sheets only consider the product from application with the brush and not when power washing.
Once this has been established a further issue is that when used in an enclosed space e.g. bus shelter or subway, the product becomes atomised and causes the full face visor to bloom creating vision problems and saturating the current RPE.
Question 1: How are the airborne product levels established i.e. what method and equipment should be used?
Question 2: Does the product used for the original graffiti need to be taken into consideration e.g. unknown paint or equivalent. I’m assuming so, but how can you protect against a truly unknown product?
Question 3: How is the monitoring task completed safely? i.e. I’m of the opinion the operatives are inadequately protected at the moment so how can personal sampling take place when the correct RPE is yet to be selected?
Question 4: Is there any RPE/PPE vision panel material available that will be resistant to blooming?
Apologies for the essay but as you can see there are a few issues to consider.
To reiterate any help is appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Cakey
What is the product and what does it contain?
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cakey
There are a number of products used but the one I'm most concerned about is classified as harmful and corrosive and has the the following risk phrases: R20/21/22, R35, R36/38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Packham
From a dermatological viewpoint I doubt whether the constituents of the graffitti will present much of a problem as they will almost certainly be in a very low concentration in the pressure wash liquid. I would be much more concerned about the actual graffitti remover.
If the product is causing problems with the facial protection, then it follows there will also be body exposure. Given the complex way in which PPE for skin protection works (or all too often doesn't work)if you let me have the constituents of the material that you are using as graffitti remover and the type of PPE that is being used for skin protection I can then comment on its suitability.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cakey
The composition of the product includes:-
Methanoic Acid (4-7%)
2 - furylmethanol Acid (11-20%)
Non hazardous alcohols and esters
Surfactants
Thickening agents
and the PPE that is being used includes
Hands - Butyl gloves
Face - Full face shield
Face mask (FFP2 standard)
Waterproof overalls
Safety footwear
I realise the PPE information is a bit scant but that is the information I have inherited.
Regards - Cakey
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Cakey
I am not familiar with furyl methanol acid but you probably need an organic vapour mask to protect from the methanoic acid; talk to your supplier.
I will leave the suitability of the gloves to Chris Packham as he knows much more than me about skin protection.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cakey
Thank you for your response Paul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
Principles of COSHH?
All this effort in protecting your employees. What about the general public?
Why use a power washer to remove?
What is the impact on the environment and eco-system of flushing this reactant to ground or drain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Packham
The butyl glove is fine for these substances.
You state that "waterproof overalls" are worn. What is the material? If PVC, then this is probably perfectly OK. Other types of waterproof may not offer the same level of chemical protection.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cakey
Yes, the overalls are PVC. Thank you for the constructive comments Chris.
Re: All this effort in protecting your employees. What about the general public?
They are completely excluded from the area and are eliminated from any danger.
Why use a power washer to remove?
That is the designed method of removal. If you can offer a safer alternative I'm all ears.
What is the impact on the environment and eco-system of flushing this reactant to ground or drain?
It is not harmful to the environment (according to the MSDS)
Any other helpful comments?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By CFT
cakey
There are other options, if you want a yap don't hesitate to contact me.
Low pressure steam is not a bad option among others. Before I retired from running a support services company including the removal of graffiti through 3 LA areas, I managed to pick a few decent bits of methodology up along the way; yes, for my sins 170 employees later, it was my own company;-)
Chazza
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cakey
Charles, I would appreciate a chinwag but how do I contact you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Cakey
You can make initial e-mail contact by clicking on CFT's name in red at the top of his contribution to the thread.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
Cakey, sorry to have caused upset, it wasn't my intention.
You'll see from subsequent posts that there are other ways (steam).
In my experience it is impossible to effectively exclude the public from spray drift from pressure washers in public areas. Steam & nozzle attachments can effectively contain the process much closer to the activity.
Respectfully, the MSDS you have is for the product you're applying, not for the reactant residue created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cakey
Thank you for all the comments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.