Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony abc jprhdnMurphy
A football club has criticised police for confiscating champagne they were drinking to celebrate a title win.
The bottles were produced at East Stirlingshire's Firs Park after East Fife moved to an unassailable 24-point lead in the Scottish Third Division.
Directors were warned that having alcohol in glass containers was illegal in football grounds and they were told by the police to remove them.
Officers later raided the dressing-room where players were celebrating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steven n
Confiscating alcohol from celebrating Scotsmen?
Hope they had the appropriate protective clothing on!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Totally agree with police over directors They could view the playing area and were thus covered by the relevant statutory provisions - not the use of glass however, merely the possession of alcohol. The offence is to have alcohol and be able to view the playing area 2hours before and 2 hours after the match. The dressing rooms are a more moot point however and strictly they needed a warrant to enter the area.
It seems, like some other directors, they believe the law does not apply to them until they are caught out.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Scotty
Nice to see the Police concerning themselves with the REAL issues of their local area....Yes, I know strictly speaking they are correct, but can you really see it happening elsewhere?
"Sorry to interupt the interview, Chick. Excuse me Mr Ferguson, but I'll have to confiscate that bottle of Krug. And no, I don't care that this is being broadcast to millions - now they can all see how petty we are......"
Come on guys.............:-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sally
I agree with the Police's actions. Rules is rules!
What would happen if a fan then wanted to take a bottle of champagne along to the next match in case of a victory. Would that be allowed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Scotty
Yes, the Police were right - rules IS rules. But were they so hard up for things to do that they decided on a raid of the changing rooms? And my last point stands as an example of the lack of application of the law across the board.
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
It does make you wonder though when you read the web report on BBC whether any of these people had their heads screwed on at all. I suppose strictly the legislation also applies to Grand Prix and other motor racing but the police seem not to be in evidence at these events. Bringing your own alcohol on the Team Bus and bringing it into the ground is also an offence however.
Still do not know why the glass was brought up, probably trying to blame H&S for the decision perhaps - but it seems to have failed on this score exccept for a brief mention. It is bad form to spray the local policeman with champers though.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By CFT
Bob
And they 'could' view the playing area two hours after the winning match? I don't think so:-)
Charley
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
CFT
If you play for Norwich you don't even know what day it is according to the sport pages today. Thought it was training day and just jumped into the car wearing only his boxers while still over the limit from the post match drinkies.
All the fans pay their wages!!!
Bob:-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Peter Farrell
Bob,
they havn't failed as a lot of people appear to have nothing better to do than respond to the article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Peter
Touche
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brian Hagyard
Robert
Not an expert on this but a quick google search would seem to suggest that the LAW broken is Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 so unless Berni has plans to move from Silverstone to Knockhill its not a problem at the GP - mind you with the weather at Knockhill that's not a bad idea could be an interesting event!
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
The whole alcohol at sporting events is a minefield but the net result is the same as I posted earlier. Directors sometimes think they are not always subject to the law if they regard the circumstances as exceptional.
Now where is the joiner to do that bit of welding on the pressure system? Only a pinhole after all.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.