Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 March 2008 09:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By declan gibney Does anyone have an opinion/experience of self assessment for DSE? I have been reliably informed that self assessment, irrespective of the process or format used is not sufficient to fulfill the employers obligation to individually assess each workstation and that only a trained assessor can undertake such assessments. Traditionally, we have issued a users guide to each DSE user with a self assessment. Advice was to read the guidance and complete the assessment within 10 days. Any matters arising are escalated to trained assessor and dealt with case by case. This has worked fine over the years (in my opinion) but is seemingly not acceptable. HAs anyone had a similar experience or an opinion on this? thanks, Declan
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 March 2008 09:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By anon1234 In my view, self assessment supported by appropriate guidance is perfectly acceptable as the starting point, followed by additional input from trained assessors and other specialists as appropriate if any concerns are raised.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 March 2008 09:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete Longworth If you look at L26 - Guidance on regulations, it quite clearly states that information provided by users is an essential part of any assessment. This can be provided by the use for example of an ergonomic checklist, but employers must ensure that workers have received the necessary training before being asked to complete such a checklist. There are 2 important aspects there: The user's input is only part of the assessment and the user must have had the necessary training.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 27 March 2008 09:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlisonSM Declan Technically according to the DSE Regs, the person should be "compentent" but some packages claim to provide training during the self assessment to allow the person to become compentent. Thing is, in my experience, people either don't read the information provided or don't actually follow it so a visual check at the person's workstation ensures not only that the equipment provided is working properly, but that the person knows how to work it!! You can get them to complete the self assessment and then quickly go through what they have said. If there are lots of staff, probably an idea to train up some DSE assessors who are responsible for an area with either specialist input from yourself (if you feel confident) or from an external source when there are cases where the assessor isn't sure what advice to provide (or specialist equipment is necessary). A lot of companies do this as it can be expensive to bring in an external contractor to conduct all the assessments.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 27 March 2008 10:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Declan You can manage risks of the 3 classes of injury specified by the DSE Regs if you add regular monitoring, e.g. by onscreen surveys, to provision of guidance as well as training. In some high pressure contexts, failure to comply with the DSE regs occurs due to failure to identify sources of stress referred to in these Regs, and consequential musculo-skeletal injuries can result (as HSE research done at the Robens Institute has reported.)
Admin  
#6 Posted : 27 March 2008 11:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer Noted this one as I am interested due to an office relocation in the near future which will mean everyone having a new workstation which will need to be assessed. Having recognised that everyone will move on the same day (or a day or so later) the task of doing that number of assessments would be huge. I therefore sought a way of doing them much easier and quicker. Doing this I found an organisation that provides a system to 'train' every one and includes a system to undertake an assessment and record how and when they are completed. This system requires the workstation holder to undertake a self assessment and record it within an electronic system that has overview by a nominated responsible person. The process contains a training pack which takes about half a day and looks quite useful. Will advise if it works.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 27 March 2008 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By VJM Declan, My organisation does the same as yours by the sounds of it. The only difference is, we now do workstation training at the end of every new starter induction, ensuring that the information on how to set up a workstation and what they should be looking for is given before they start working. Then we give them the self assessment at the end of the training to take away with them. The only issue I have with this is, our inductions are now a full day and you have lost most people with information being barraged at them all day. However, we try and make it light and use working examples of a desk and I have found a lot less queiries regarding workstations now we've started the training. So hopefully something is getting through. Good luck with it.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 27 March 2008 12:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Declan Stimulated by observations of others, I reread your question and noted that you wrote about 'the employers obligation to individually assess each workstation'. Actually, the employer's responsibility is to assess the risk of using DSE, which is a much larger issue than individually assessing each workstation and its apparent compatibility for the task and user. One of the relevant tools, not yet as widely known as it should, is a short screening questionnaire called 'Workscreen' which has been validated for assessing vulnerability of people for working in office and other environments; I have no commercial interest in this instrument and can simply say that its technical validation is impressive. This is an example of assessment that is relevant to risk but doesn't focus directly on the workstation but on the user.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 27 March 2008 19:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Bit contentious, The DSE regs are probably the worst set of regs that were ever ever ever produced and have ben the biggest bone of contention for years. Employees have abused this set of 'Conkers' regs for years at great expense for very little reduction in risk and IMOHO should be scrapped forthwith! In five years NO Prosecutions and only about 40 IN in the last 5 years most of those in government / public bodies - zealous EHOs me thinks. this is the biggest waste of time, effort and money and loads of companies are making shed loads from it, as well as the scaremongering tactic's from DSE training companies. Been a long day so rant over!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 28 March 2008 01:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48 Hi Declan, I agree with your outline of what is usually done. I think there is a level at which it is reasonable to allow that a reasonable person can complete an adequate self assessment based on some very basic training. In my experience it is far more likely that they will err towards an over-cautious report rather than skim over and miss things. If you are concerned why not put a sample check into your system? Say 5% or 10% of all DSE self-assessments are re-checked with the employee by you or another competent person. You would have to determine the actual % based on your circumstances. I note that you may work in Eire? I guess that your regs require much the same as UK ones but just in case not, my comments are based on UK experience. By the way, has anyone else noticed that some of the worst office/workstation layouts and set ups are those of senior staff or is it just me? I had one the other day who sat there and said "It doesn't matter because I am never going to sue the company, I have been using this chair for 20 years and I don't have any problems". He got up as I was leaving and, as he did so, groaned loudly about his bad back--Doh!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 28 March 2008 08:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By VJM Pete, I had a director of the company attend one of my training sessions and was the only one actually interested and asking questions! But on the whole, yes I agree with you. The higher the management, the thicker the glass ceiling that you can't get through. VJM
Admin  
#12 Posted : 28 March 2008 09:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 Dave, oddly I feel the same way about asbestos surveys and the emotive way companies advertise their services.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 28 March 2008 15:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Take the point mate but never seen a death from using a PC! maybe wait another 40 years to see
Admin  
#14 Posted : 28 March 2008 16:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By willhiem dave your post made me curious, has a computer ever killed anyone? so i got the help of good ole tom google to find this article (below), in the end it was the software that did it but its an interesting read. (yes, its friday and i thought it might get me up to 17:00 but it hasnt!!!) http://www.ccnr.org/fatal_dose.html
Admin  
#15 Posted : 28 March 2008 18:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 I'm not arguing that Dave, but I would dispute the current forecasts!!!
Admin  
#16 Posted : 29 March 2008 14:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Donk Got me interested now. Please Dave could you point me in the direction to confirm the 40 prosecutions in the last 5 years. Kindest regards Donk
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.