Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 March 2008 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony abc jprhdnMurphy How did these two subjects become bedfellows? I am very motivated by the whole subject of Safety in the workplace, safe systems etc but unfortunately I do not have the same passion for the environment, basically I wont be here to view the impact. I know this is selfish but it just doesnt rattle my cage, and in any case I do believe the earth has a natural resistance to all things environmental. I feel as if I am letting the side down but no matter how I try I cannot comprehend the environmental aspect of what we are trying to achieve. Does any body else feel the same?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 March 2008 10:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Tony, Environmental issues have always concerned me, more so now that I have children, whilst I agree with Mother Natures natural resistance to attack, we as a race are imposing more demand than ever on the environment which at times appears almost suicidal, consider this point " the human race is the only species to actively work towards its own destruction and ultimate extinction" This was made in the context of genetic engineering. Concerning your point r.e. the mix of H&S and the environmental issues of industry/work activity I again agree with you, perhaps there are a lot of H&S professional out there with time to kill! Mitch (come on it is Friday and the pub opens at 12.00)
Admin  
#3 Posted : 28 March 2008 10:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap I find it intersting and challenging. I think you may well be around to see the difference. Especially if your home floods or you house is battered by storms. As the price of oil, council tax and food goes up. Let's hope they dont build a wind farmmnear you. It s happening now.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 28 March 2008 10:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis I just recall the term "social responsibility" and answers appear Bob
Admin  
#5 Posted : 28 March 2008 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Rob, You've set me off on a nostalgic trip down memory lane to those pre-Thatcherite days of Social Responsibility, I find it hard to believe we took it for granted once upon a time. Mitch
Admin  
#6 Posted : 28 March 2008 10:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze Tony: "I do believe the earth has a natural resistance to all things environmental..." It's called the "Gaia Hypothesis" and was propounded by the scientist and environmentalist James Lovelock. But I wouldn't get too excited about the theory, as it goes on to state that nature tends to extinguish those species in the environment that place too much pressure on resources. This is how in the balance is maintained. Last time I checked, that included humans. The above sort of answers the main question, because extinction of the human race, well "that's elf n safety, innit?"
Admin  
#7 Posted : 28 March 2008 10:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT Methinks the reason the two are 'lumped' together is it's an employer issue, as most will want to get what they can out of an H&S manager/occifer/whatever; and believe they are making a real commitment to the environment without any real consideration as to the persons competency in 'E' areas; this, is a waste of effort and energy IMO. Rose tinted specs scenario! Done properly, with 14001, it can be extremely satisfying, if one has the time, the knowledge and the where-with-all that is. CFT
Admin  
#8 Posted : 28 March 2008 11:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis CFT With the posters concerns re management systems I avoided the 14001 mention:-) It is satisfying however and as my wife oft points out it ties in closely with Gyna-ecology. Prizes for naming the author in the next hour!! Perhaps Bob
Admin  
#9 Posted : 06 April 2008 13:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David John Harris I am astonished by the previous letters. Environmental considerations in business do not consider the global issues as the utmost relevance but consider the "What am I going to get out of it scenario" By considering environmental considerations businesses can save a lot of expenditure. Recently I implemented ISO 14001 - 2004 into a multi site business with 35 depots across the UK and saved immediately an annual saving of £75,000 on waste removal whilst ensuring 75% of it was recycled. I also assisted the business in gaining £5,000,000 of business through better control of possible environmental hazards which includes H&S considerations. H&S is linked with Environmental management and overlaps consioderably.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 07 April 2008 11:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Haggis JM Well, as an Environmentalist, I've often wondered this from the other point of view - who landed H & S on the Environmental Managers? Speaking personally, I have to say that H & S does not get me nearly as passionate as the environment. I suppose you could say that H &S is about looking after individuals, while environment is about looking after the entire species, and every other species as well!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 07 April 2008 17:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Hamish Hi guys don't you feel they fit together as most aspects of H&S have some environmental impact on the environment. Hamish
Admin  
#12 Posted : 08 April 2008 12:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By William I think they originally came together due to regs such as coshh which affects both the workforce and the environment, if you take other issues such as pest control and pigeon droppings in the workplace, they would also overlap. For example lets say that to save on excess packaging a company decided to use larger containers when purchasing chemicals, but the larger containers would mean a greater risk of manual handling injuries than the smaller ones or even better would be to try to not use chemicals at all, this would prevent workforce contact with chemicals which would also benefit the environment. Someone with knowledge of both subjects would be better placed to weigh up the positives and negatives.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 08 April 2008 14:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dav I was recently posed with a difficult conundrum. I have recently moved to Dubai to take up a position of HSE Manager for a company out here. When deciding what car to buy when i arrived, obviously there are a number of issues to consider. I travel daily on statistically one of the most dangerous roads in the world, so need a car that is safe and will protect me in an accident - Maybe something big then? The roads leading to the sites that i have to visit are often not good, and a smaller car would get stuck - a 4x4 then maybe? Part of my role is to manage environmental issues and reduce the impacts of the company on the environment. I also genuinly care and want to 'do my bit' for the world - a small efficient car then? Unfortunately the first two have to take precedence and camels are too slow, so its a big gas guzzler for me. Sorry mother nature.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 08 April 2008 14:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Haggis JM Dav, so having 'decided' on a 'big gas guzzler', I trust you then compared fuel economy, emission levels, recyclability of components, free of toxic metals, no PVC used in manufacture, and energy consumed in manufacture? Even within the 'bad' choices there are still degrees of badness...
Admin  
#15 Posted : 08 April 2008 15:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh In my expeerience H&S and E get lumped with things like Security and Quality (sometimes HR) in the JNOEW category. Jobs No One Else Wants................
Admin  
#16 Posted : 08 April 2008 15:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colin After reading all the various replies it is obvious that something is happening out there by weather patterns and the increasing extinction rate, mother nature is fighting back if we dont concentrate more on the environment we won't need to worry about H&S there will be no one left.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.