Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 April 2008 16:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DHM
Hi All

I work for a Co. that has multiple sites and we are contractually responsible for their up keep and general maintenance.

I have no records of any Fixed Electrical Testing, and we have not been at any site for longer than 5 years. Added to this some of our sites are shared with other Co.'s.

I have been told that Fixed Electrical Testing can still be undertaken at the shared sites for our share of the wiring.

Where does my Co. stand legally?

Do I convince my boss to spend money and do all sites even though we have not been there for 5 years?

Any ideas??

Thanks

DHM
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 April 2008 17:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48
DHM, a couple of links that should move you forwards on your query.

http://www.modbs.co.uk/n...sting_and_inspection.htm

http://www.workplacelaw....stComments/thread_id/814
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 April 2008 18:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT
DHM

Look at the policy conditions that the underwriters provide for you and I would suggest that it may be indicative within said policy.

Might not though.

CFT
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 April 2008 08:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Your duty is to ensure that all systems are of such construction as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, danger. You also have to maintain the systems so as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, such danger.

You therefore should have carried out an initial inspection to inform you of the state of the conditions. From there you can go on to routine inspections and periodic examinations and testing at suitable intervals.

Regards Adrian Watson

Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 April 2008 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David John Harris

I concur with Adrian watson as quoted below:

"Your duty is to ensure that all systems are of such construction as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, danger. You also have to maintain the systems so as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, such danger.

You therefore should have carried out an initial inspection to inform you of the state of the conditions. From there you can go on to routine inspections and periodic examinations and testing at suitable intervals".

Obviously keep concise records of all Inspections and maintenance and alterations and keep within the Buildings Records sheets to be handed over to any new buyers of any property sold.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 06 April 2008 17:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler CMIOSH
You have a duty of care, at present you have failed in that duty.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 06 April 2008 18:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4
Are you able to contact the previous owners/occupiers?
Admin  
#8 Posted : 15 April 2008 10:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DHM
Thanks for all of your responses, I am looking into getting a supplier to carry out these checks shortly.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.