Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 12 April 2008 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever How would you conduct the evacuation of a 6000 person public assembly/conference/exhibition centre in the event of fire? I am looking for the pros and cons for simultaneously evacuating such a large number of persons and whether it is best to disperse the occupants or try to provide on site assembly points. The site boundaries are very limited but a safe distance from the building can be achieved from where persons can eventually disperse if necessary. I have my own thoughts which conflict with the local fire authority. I would be interested to hear from others who may have ideas or suggestions that may not have occurred to me. Perhaps some lateral thinking. Crowd management, staff/public ratios and potential hazards aside from fire are things that need to be considered.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 12 April 2008 19:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Guderian Really don't want to give the wrong impression here but... I assume this is emergency evacuation in the event of a fire? In which case, afraid it has to be said - after so many postings insisting that fire risk assessments and by implication associated fire evacuation plans should only be completed by 'qualified/experienced' fire safety people/ex fire fighters - why are you asking the majority of us? Who are by and large mere general safety managers/advisors/officers/engineers etc. After all, aren't we supposed to know about the behaviour of fire, building design, actions of people in emergency situations, all of which are supposed to be known only by fire safety experts...... If it was me, I would ask a fire safety expert as I would consider such a fire risk assessment/emergency plan to be well outside of my competence/expereince. Now then who could I ask........?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 12 April 2008 20:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever This is not so much a query about fire safety. The building has not been constructed yet. I have established the fire and evacuation strategy for the building with the exception of where to put them once they have left. I have my own plans but these conflict with the local fire authority. This issue is more about crowd control and crowd dynamics rather than fire safety hence me asking for risks other than fire. I am looking to this forum because there are many wise heads here who may be more aware of the risks of dealing with large crowds tha I am.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 12 April 2008 20:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer Just to make the point. Fire risk assessments are not the sole domain of ex-firemen, it is a myth and should be stated so clearly, it is the domain of competent persons. Competence can be obtained by attending a suitable training course. Will people stop trying to get retired firemen the sole right to undertake fire risk assesments. The Fire Training Scholl at Morton in Marsh is on record as oproducing and conducting training in fire risk assessment with non fire fighters attending so even the fire training college holds the opinion that to undertake a fire risk assessment does not require you to be an ex-fire fighter.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 12 April 2008 22:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D. Hilton Shaun difficult without additional detail, dont know the layout, compartmentation, grouping of individuals, number and degree of training for intended staff etc. I would advocate a two stage alarm in order to initiate a response (verification of alarm & fire condition). Verification of fire would initiate an evacuation and deployment of trained personnel to predetermined points outside of the building. These trained staff should be provided with portable PA equipment in order to attempt to control the crowds in his/her location in oder to have them travel to a safe distance muster point. Final crowd dispersion would then take place by releasing or advising the crowds to disperse from one or two muster points at a time. As you are more than aware, the difficulty is in the behaviour of the evacuating occupants. The main hazards would relate to restriction of crowds against obstructions, barriers etc and the crush injury/asphyxiation hazards associated. I presume you have already reviewed the Green, Purple & Primrose Guides? Further reference could be made to the following: Sime J. Crowd Safety Management and Communications in Disasters. MoSHE. 1992 Available from the Building Research Establishment. Borehamwood or from JSA Research Consultants, Goldalming, Surrey. Ketchell, N, Cole, S. et. al. The EGRESS code for human movement and behaviour in emergency evacuations in Engineering for Crowd Safety 1993 Elsevier. (Ed Smith RA, Dickie J) ISBN 0 444 899200. Kendik, E. Assessment of Escape Routes in Building and a design method for calculating Pedestrian Movement. Society of Fire Protection Engineers Technology Report 85-4 (1985). Hemisphere Pub. Corp Hanna, J. Emergency Preparedness guidelines for mass, crowd-intensive events Emergency Preparedness 614.88 Han Canada. Sept (1995) Helbing, D. A Fluid-dynamic model for the movement of Pedestrians. Complex systems 6 (1992) pages 391-415 Pauls, J. Movement of People. SFPE Handbook of fire Protection Engineering. (1988). National Council of Canada and BUSI Building Safety Institute. Regards D
Admin  
#6 Posted : 12 April 2008 22:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By lizzie harvey Hi Shaun, Ikea have a system in place where a coded message or a pre-arranged tune is placed over the tannoy before the fire alarm goes off. This ensures the creche is fully evacuated and the children are at an evacuation point before the fire alarm sounds. Once the alarm sounds, a tannoy message informs parents that the children are out the building and at "X" point. Perhaps you could adapt this system to your needs? Hope this helps..... All the best Lizzie
Admin  
#7 Posted : 12 April 2008 23:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D. Hilton Am presuming progressive evacuation has been considered and excluded by you?
Admin  
#8 Posted : 13 April 2008 09:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever Darren Thanks for your response. Quite a lot of reading material there. I have access to some of it (SFPE). I have developed the fire safety design and strategy for the building (well sort of, the building is still in design stage so there are still opportunities to tweak things). Difficult to provide more details of the building. It is a very complicated building. In fact the conference centre is just one part of a much larger development with a hotel on one side and an office tower on the other. All three buildings form a single structure and it is possible to walk from one to the other without exting any of the buildings. So as you can see very complicated. I would like to disperse the occupants of the convention centre once they exit the building but the local fire authority (not UK) want me to provide an assembly point within the boundary of the site at 0.3m2 per person, a total of 1800m2. Personally I think it would be more hazardous to hold the occupants than to let them disperse.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 13 April 2008 10:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 Mainly out of my remit this one Shaun, but I don't subscribe to the theory that if you ask a question you are incompetent. I'd suggest on the crowd front that they should disperse simply because it will be quicker. Trying to fit people into a restricted space will reduce the speed of evacuation.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 13 April 2008 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D H Hi Shaun. I would suspect that in the current climate we live in, there would be a risk of terrorist attack on large population gatherings. The emergency services do "table top" exercises to deal with such situations. Don't know if they would share their ideas? Sorry I cant help. Dave
Admin  
#11 Posted : 13 April 2008 13:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D. Hilton Shaun from your description of the structure (out in the middle east I assume). I would presume that progressive horizontal evacuation is the way forward and that no doubt you have considered and modelled for this. WRT, the holding of the occupants outside the building, the limit advised is below the safe packing density limit for the UK (4 people per Metre squared)and at that speed crowd speed is calculated at 0.4 m/sec. The limiting factor to the holding scenario is that of the chest cavity and restriction of breathing. IMO, I would suggest that it is unlikely for all 6000 people to be outside the building structure at the same time due to fire although it is conceivable due to bomb threat. I do not see a problem in the packing density advised but I would suggest that the holding points are a prime location for secondary terrorist devices and on that basis alone the holding versus dispersion would not be my first choice. However, even the immediate dispersion or large numbers of people would be a target wrt explosive devices. Regards Darren
Admin  
#12 Posted : 14 April 2008 09:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Shaun there are lots of differing opinions about how best to deal with crowds as large as 6,000 - not least because communication and control becomes very difficult. One also need to consider the properties of the areas large enough to accommodate so many - the proximity to other risks (targets?); prevailing wind direction (smoke); further evacuation (other buildings); further evacuation (confirmed secondary problems - e.g. car bomb has much increased radius or clear zone than small fire); etc. Too near they become a hindrance to emergency work. Dispersion also depends on profile. Workers are different to conference attendees. 10am is different to 4pm or lunchtime. Dispersal will occur naturally at lunch time or home time. Whatever you decide to push for, make sure you can handle it in terms of reasonable levels of control and communication. Imagine having to arrange for them to move to a second location promptly - could you do it?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.