Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 April 2008 14:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Homer As per norm I have everything dumped on me for a job that is to start Monday, the site based team are "not paperwork people" and I am allegedly an expert on everything.....NOT!! I am looking for some help on two points and I need this urgently. A nice short sharp staement on silting mitigation procedures for protection of watercourses on new road development and we have also been asked for a procedure on causing silting of watercourse...waht the H is that? Please help I've managed to pul everything else together but running out of time.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 April 2008 14:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Elliot Morton Hi Homer What about the Enviroment Agency notice PPG5 - Works in, near or liable to effect water courses as a starter point? It may help regards Elliot
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 April 2008 23:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MP Grayson Not too sure if this is what you are after or not, but here goes. This is in layman’s terms and some are worst case scenarios. The problem with silting is that it does several things. 1. Covers plants or colours the water and reduces the sunlight reaching the plants and micro-organisms. So you switch off the food chain from the bottom up. 2. Damages the gills of fish and other thingies living in the water. Nymphs etc. So again you upset the delicate food chain balance. 3. Damages water treatment plant equipment. (A bit extreme, but it can). 4. Reduces the depth of rivers. As boats pass over it, it all gets stirred up and the process starts again. Or by displacement it increases the risk of flooding. 5. If it contains nutrients it can cause Eutrophication. That is basically a flush of nutrients, causing a massive increase in goodies at the bottom of the food chain. Once the nutrients have gone the whole food chain, which has expanded proportionately all the way up, collapses from the bottom upwards. What you need is an accumulator or holding tank of sorts where the silt and water run off can be allowed to settle prior to re-entering a river etc. But be careful you have just opened a can of worms. You need to look on the Environment Agency website at “consent to discharge” regulations etc. This is a big problem with sugar beet factories for example. They have to have large settling ponds for the soil which is washed off the beets as they are processed. EA law is a real minefield and very messed up. H/S law is a breeze in comparison. Crack on and have fun.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 April 2008 23:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MP Grayson Sorry EA should read Environmental Law.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.