Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 16 May 2008 16:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Petrie
As I was walking to work this morning I noticed some of these signs on the street and it got me thinking.

Surely if there is a danger, likely from dropped objects, they should cordon off the pavement to prevent people walking under it.

Or does the sign simply mean don't be supprised if a bucket hit's you on the head.

On our sites we would ensure any area like this was cordened off and thet site staff have hard hats. Is it therefore OK for members of the public to walk under work?

The only things the signs achieved as far as I could see was that as it was very busy some had to step into the busy road to get by (most not looking first either).
Admin  
#2 Posted : 16 May 2008 17:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
If the public footpath is closed or obstructed by the works then you can contact your local Authority Road Department. There should be barriers above to prevent things falling on you, and a safe alternative to walking on the road to get past.
Contractors generally need permission to "take over" a public footpath.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 16 May 2008 17:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant
The problem is in that phrase "member of the public" - if the right of way hasn't been closed by a TRO, they have the legal right to use it despite any workplace notices you may throw in their path. Members of the public don't have to abide by HASAWA nor can they be prosecuted for ignoring it.

So by explaining what the hazard is, people are hopefully more likely to steer clear. If you want to try it, cone off a chunk of pavement and don't put up any signs - people will walk through the cones within minutes. Do it again with a "Danger! Unexploded Myth!" notice and they'll keep out.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 16 May 2008 20:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D H
Hi Andy - can I suggest that if someone has put signs up, then it is "reasonably foreseeable" that something could fall from above.
Therefore the duty of care is owed and care procedures implemented.

Oh for the perfect world eh? That is why we are killing over 200 people every year.

I personally would have called the local authority or the HSE and let them deal with it.

Am I sad or what?

Dave
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 May 2008 15:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs
Not sad, Dave - just a little impractical. If I called that in (and it is one of my pet hates too) I would expect to get a rather disinterested reply of "we'll get round to it sometime" ...

It's not a big issue to an over-streched resource, but it might get mentioned at their next visit :-)

Having said that, I had ours replaced with "overhead work" signs because we had controlled the dangers.

It is up to us to educate the cleaning companies and those making the signs ;-)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.