Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 June 2008 11:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By neil cannell Scenario, Small analytical laboratory, open plan ground floor with stairs which lead from the edge of the lab desks, to an open plan upper mezzanine floor. My concern is although large quantities of dangerous chemicals are not used in this area, there may be some that if containers were broken would require evacuation of area including mezzanine which would need to be evacuated down the only set of stairs past where the chemicals may have been spilled. Good managers willing to listen want to do right thing. All lab workers are trained chemists very competent. Chemical type used bromine type so small release could mean evacuation. Risk assessment results, could be • Remove substitute chemicals, awkward, after all it is a lab, • Removal of process’s that might result in fumes being released to separate rooms • Engineered, open plan access removed lab area contained in separate room (open plan designed to create greater worker comfort) • LEV, fume covers • If possible secondary exit from mezzanine, difficult, expensive Have not considered escape sets for upstairs, upstairs used as canteen meeting room, storage Opinions please
Admin  
#2 Posted : 03 June 2008 11:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Blunt I think you still have some 'what ifs' to look at. What is the maximum amount that might be spilt? What would be the consequence - would the area immediately become a danger to life and health (you may need to do some calculation here - and if you Google idlh, you will find the NIOSH site which has some very helpful figures)? If not an immediate danger to life and health, would it exceed any WEL? What are the likely causes of a spillage? The answers to those questions might guide you to the best options. Putting it in another room is not going to be a great help if you have to transport it via this room and it gets broken on the way. If it immediately becomes a threat to life and health when spilt, then it should be in a fume cupboard or within a hood. Transport in this case needs careful thought. If you do spill it, how are you going to alert people on the floor above? After you have evacuated the area, then what? Does this substance disperse, or are you going to have to don BA and go in to clear it up? Jane
Admin  
#3 Posted : 03 June 2008 11:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Konstanty Budkiewicz Neil, In support of the earlier posting. Can we assume that: a. you have a minumum of 6 air changes per hour in the lab? and b. that negative pressure is maintained in relation to the higher-level less hazardous area? and c. High level air input and low level extract? Kon, CMIOSH
Admin  
#4 Posted : 03 June 2008 11:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By neil cannell A small amount (less than half a cup full ) would be bad. WEL would be exceeded health issues with bromide are serious so evacuation would be necessary, causes of the spillage would be accidental breakage. I was looking for alternatives before i thought about the fitting of panic alarms around lab desks to warn upstairs occupants who may have to pass through vapours on there way out(something i am trying to avoid). Spill kits with breathing apparatus may well have to be used for clean up.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 03 June 2008 12:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By neil cannell Kon As i understand it no, the original lab area had the mezzanine added, the ventilation system is work in progress
Admin  
#6 Posted : 03 June 2008 12:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Blunt Less than half a cup-full is quite small. How are you controlling the risk in the process that it is being used for? Jane
Admin  
#7 Posted : 03 June 2008 13:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By neil cannell thanks jane The systems in place ,use of small quantities fume cuboards, ppe, safe systems, training are almost certainly the same as used all over the country, and in a normal lab would be fine, the presence of an open plan lab with mezzanine is what i feel is complicating the issue. The need to either avoid, or plan for emergency procedures,(for this problem) together with preventing the inevitable release of fumes to the upstairs level is what i am looking for. neil
Admin  
#8 Posted : 03 June 2008 13:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Blunt I am confused - are you saying that this open plan lab has fume cupboards in it? If so, then the circumstances under which there will be a spillage that is dangerous are reduced to times when the chemical is transported from one place to another in the lab.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 03 June 2008 13:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By neil cannell jane sorry if its confusing, Open plan by virtue of the fact that the mezzanine overlooks the lab area. There are fume cupboard's on the exterior walls, but the main work bench area is open plan. Chemicals are transported to and from this area as safely as possible but there is always a chance of breakage and it is this chance that i am concerned with, ie people upstairs escaping through fumes as the stairs from upstairs terminate at the edge of the work station area.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 03 June 2008 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs One solution is to limit transportation to times when the Mez floor is unoccupied. This should not take too much planning. Store and work with the hazardous solutions within the fume cupboards.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 03 June 2008 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colin Reeves Not sure of the layout, but if the staircase to the mezzanine is along a wall, could this not be partitioned off to form a corridor to an escape door. Then, so long as the pressure in the mezzanine / stairway was positive this would remove that whole area from concern. Colin
Admin  
#12 Posted : 03 June 2008 13:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Blunt To be honest, without actually being able to see the place it is difficult to get much further. Re-reading your original post, it concerns me that the mezzanine floor is used as a canteen - my days in a chemistry lab showed me that many things are slightly volatile and most surfaces collect a 'film' of something. But that is a side issue. From what you say, everyone is liable to be exposed - not just those coming down the stairs. Thus breakages in the open lab need to be made extremely unlikely. You can do this by keeping the stuff in the fume cupboard - not ideal, as you shouldn't use the fume cupboard for storage. Another alternative is to store it under the fume cupboard (they usually have cupboards underneath) or beside it.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 03 June 2008 14:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Konstanty Budkiewicz Neil, I Googled your problem and suggest that you invest £150 for the following document: BS ISO 15190:2003 Medical laboratories. Requirements for safety. Armed with this you should be able to conduct a gap analysis, as implied by Jane earlier. You would then be in a position to conduct a valid risk assessment and seek a resolution of any emerging issues. Kon
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.