Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 July 2008 13:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian_P Just had the following thrown at me. Need a quick answer in preparation for a Union meeting at 4. We have engineering workshops where besides all the general welding, grinding, sanding down etc. (controlled with LEV & PPE) we also have paint spray booths where vehicles are...painted. Paint Sprayers are given FOC health surveillance services including lung capacity tests etc. on a regular basis. Question is: Are mechanics / body builders etc. entitled to similar OH tests & services. We used to provide this but, unbeknown to me this has been withdrawn. I'll start googling etc. now but if anyone has experience of the above any help would be welcomed. Friday meetings Grrrr...
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 July 2008 14:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Baxter You will need to understand what they are exposed to before agreeing to carryout health surveillance. This is information supplied by our OH provider. Hope it helps! Health Surveillance Guide for Managers introduction • Each week in the UK 500 people leave the workforce permanently because of ill health caused by work. Many of these illnesses are preventable. Managers can reduce the costs, both financial and human, by taking effective steps to control health risks at work. One important element is appropriate health surveillance for employees, which can detect the early signs of illness. • This guide provides practical advice on the “what, who and when” for health surveillance. The list of situations is not exhaustive. Indeed, the requirement for health surveillance is driven by the outcome of the risk assessment process. what the law says • The Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (Regulation 6) require: Every employer shall ensure that his employees are provided with such health surveillance as is appropriate having regard to the risks to their health and safety which are identified by the assessment • Health surveillance is required if: ? an identifiable disease or adverse health effect may be related to exposure ? there is a reasonable likelihood that the disease or effect may occur under the particular conditions of work ? there are valid techniques for detecting indications of the disease or the effect • Surveillance needs to be systematic, regular and you must act on the results. This does not require unreasonable actions e.g., creating a new job, but by making changes to the current role which are possible without a large cost (financial, structural or personal). • It is your duty to ensure that surveillance of your employees has taken place. what is health surveillance? • it is not something that needs to always be done by medical professionals - supervisors should arrange to do periodic surveillance using simple questionnaires and employees should do self-checks, after basic and appropriate awareness training. (Note: self checks are not sufficient on their own to comply with the law, but a method to ensure earlier detection) • periodic samples may be collected directly by employees, e.g. urine, to check whether substances have entered the body and whether they having effects. Individuals are not further examined unless results are “abnormal”. • medical surveillance is done by professionals and may include questionnaires, examinations and testing of samples: blood, urine, etc. • baseline surveillance is often required if an employee is to be exposed for the first time to a hazard which has a significant risk of causing health effects. It establishes a baseline for later results. what information will I get after surveillance? you will know: ? if the employee is fit to continue in the job ? whether some modification is required to the job ? if the employee is unfit to continue doing the job This information constitutes the Health Record, and is not the same as the occupational health record, which is confidential. what exposures may require health surveillance undertaken by Occupational Health? This section lists the commonest hazards that require periodic health surveillance by occupational health, the justification, the frequency and the arrangements. Noise Justification: • Excessive noise exposure causes cumulative damage to the hearing mechanism in the ear. Exposures ?80dBA averaged over 8 hours are excessive. • Hearing naturally declines with age. The addition of noise-induced hearing loss can result in serious hearing problems. Noise-induced hearing loss due to work is the commonest work-related disease. • Primary prevention of excessive noise exposure is by reduction at the source e.g. enclosures. However, this is not always possible and therefore PPE is often used e.g. ear muffs. It should not be assumed that these are sufficient protection. • Employees that work in situations where hearing PPE is provided should have health surveillance to detect whether abnormal hearing loss is occurring. • Exposure to ? 80 dBA increases the risk of significant deafness. Frequency The surveillance programme is: ? Please refer to separate audiometry guidance Arrangements Face-to-face interview and examination by Occupational Health Adviser (OHA): ? When notified by manager or HR Vibration Justification: • Prolonged exposure to vibration can cause an illness known as Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome - HAVS (formerly known as Vibration White Finger). HAVS affects the blood vessels, nerves and muscles, ligaments and joints of the hand, arm and neck. • If not identified early, it can lead to permanent disability, loss of sensation and permanent pain. It has no known cause apart from exposure to vibration. • Early detection and removal from vibration work normally leads to disappearance of the symptoms. There is no effective treatment apart from ceasing vibration work. HAVS is an industrial injury and is reportable under RIDDOR. • All individuals exposed above the HSE Action Level require surveillance by law (see Safety First, Second Nature website for guidance on Action Level). Frequency The surveillance programme is: ? Please refer to separate vibration guidance Arrangements Questionnaire followed by face-to-face interview with Occupational Health Adviser (OHA) if problem identified. ? When notified by manager or HR Working Hours Justification: • There is no evidence that working more than a specified number of hours is detrimental to health. There is evidence that some medical conditions can be made worse or exacerbated by night work, although no specific medical factor rules is out. • For the purposes of surveillance, night work is a normal course of work which includes at least three hours between 11.00 p.m. and 6.00 am. The normal course of work means a majority of days on a regular basis and would normally include those on a rotating shift. Young workers under 18 yrs are who work any time between 10.00 p.m. and 6.00 are included. Frequency The surveillance programme is: ? Before assignment to night work ? every 3 years to age 45; every 2 years to age 60; every 1 year thereafter, whilst night work continues ? When a significant medical condition occurs which may affect fitness e.g. diabetes ? All night workers after illness lasting >1 month Arrangements Questionnaire followed by face-to-face interview with Occupational Health Adviser (OHA) if problem identified. ? When notified by manager or HR Breathing Apparatus Justification: • Full breathing apparatus (Full BA) requires the chest to function in a different way to the normal. Normally, the active (chest muscle) part of breathing is breathing in. The natural, elastic recoil of the chest facilitates breathing out. • With full breathing apparatus, the active part is breathing out against the expiration valve. Breathing in is the passive part, the “push” being supplied by the gas pressure. In some systems, positive “resistance” is needed to control the expansion of the chest against the gas pressure, further increasing the strain of using Full BA. Overall, breathing is much more tiring with Full BA. • Individuals who have medical conditions, which affect the lungs, can experience problems with full BA. Their condition can become worse. Also, because the heart is in the chest, those with heart and circulation problems may suffer significant difficulties with using Full BA, because of changes in pressure in the chest. • As we grow older our lung function decreases and when this is added to damage, that may have been done by other agents (e.g. smoking), the lungs become more “rigid” and greater effort is required to move them. The additional stress of Full BA may then cause problems. • Some people naturally cannot tolerate a mask on their face and can become very anxious and over breath, resulting in early exhaustion of the gas supply and reduced concentration and safety on the job. Frequency The surveillance programme is: ? Before starting Full BA work ? Every 3 years until 45 ? Every year until retirement ? After any significant illness which may affect fitness e.g. chest infection ? After illness that lasts >1 month. Arrangements Face-to-face interview and examination with Occupational Health Adviser (OHA): ? When notified by manager or HR Confined Spaces Justification: • Confined spaces may contain toxic gases, be dusty, be very limited in space to enter, move around and exit, be poorly lit and be noisy. • Individuals with lung, heart and circulation problems may be adversely affected by toxic gas and dust exposure. Those with problems with muscles, ligaments and joints may be unable to move around, adopt safe working positions and escape in an emergency. Those that are overweight may not be able to safely enter or exit the space. • Some recurring medical problems are easy to deal and compatible with working in a low hazard environment e.g. an office. However, if the condition occurs in an environment where access for medical support is difficult or further harm can be done e.g. epilepsy, confined spaces entry carries a high risk. • Some people naturally have difficulty with entering a confined space, and will manifest behaviour which may be unsafe e.g. claustrophobia. Frequency The surveillance programme is: ? Before initial training for confined space entry ? Every 12 months during confined spaces refresher training ? After any significant illness which may affect fitness e.g. heart attack, chest infection ? After illness that lasts >1 month. Arrangements Questionnaire completed by employee and assessed by OHA: ? When attending confined spaces training ? When notified by manager or HR Forklift Drivers Justification: • Forklift truck (FLT) drivers operate often in confined spaces. Annually 20 deaths and 5000 injuries occur each year. 45% of accidents are caused wholly or partly by driver error. • FLT drivers need to be carefully selected, trained and supervised. Safe control and operation requires a reasonable degree of mental and physical fitness. Persons with disabilities are necessarily excluded, but a functional assessment is required. Frequency The surveillance programme is: ? Before starting FLT driving duties. ? Age 40 and at 3 yearly intervals thereafter until 60. (WorkFit guidance) ? After and injury or illness that may affect fitness e.g. eye disease, impairment of upper limb function. ? After illness that lasts >1 month. ? After an accident where the driver’s ability to driver may be impaired or where medical reasons may have caused the accident. Arrangements Face-to-face interview and examination with Occupational Health Adviser (OHA): ? When notified by manager or HR
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 July 2008 14:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By SLS To be honest, health surveillance tests dont cost the earth, and as they are so easy to arrange, with the benefit of possibly catching a health problem in its early stages, i think that its worth offering mechanics, panel beaters and paint sprayers the tests. For us it's: Panel beaters/paint sprayers = Annual lung function, hearing & skin. Technicians = Annual hearing & skin.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 July 2008 14:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham If paint sprayer are spraying paints containing isocyanates, then biological monitoring should be introduced, i.e. urine sample analysed for isocyanates. The Health and Safety Laboratory offers this as a service as do some independent laboratories. MS24 (Medical aspects of occupational skin disease) states: “. . . employers are required to arrange for employees to receive suitable health surveillance where there is exposure to a substance known to be associated with skin disease or adverse effects on the skin and where, under particular working conditions, there is a reasonable likelihood that the disease or effect may occur.” This would cover most of those occupations you have mentioned, including where PPE such as gloves are worn for any length of time, as this can contribute towards contact dermatitis (and I am not referring to latex allergy!). Skin health surveillance can range from a simple visual check by a suitably trained person to skin condition measurement which can detect skin damage at a stage where there are no visible signs, permitting pre-emptive action at an early stage. Chris
Admin  
#5 Posted : 18 July 2008 14:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anthony Edwards Ian, If Mechanics are subjected to diesel fume I would include them on Lung function tests (COSHH) assessment should tell you though. We conduct Health surveillance for all our welders (Lung function tests) regards Nutty
Admin  
#6 Posted : 18 July 2008 15:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian_P Cheers for your prompt & very informative responses. Seems there was a little confusion on my part. Here's what we provide: Sprayers: Audio, Lung Function, Bio (Isocyanates) Bodyshop / Welders etc.: Audio, Lung Function. Technicians: Nowt The argument from the union was that technicians should recieve the same OH as the bodyshop staff. We'll conduct a review on whether our technicians need an audio assessment however noise assessments & resulting control measures have reduced noise exposure to acceptable levels. (body shops etc. are segregated). This is not a financial decision (although OH for 300 mechanics can't be that cheap!) more a decision whther they actually need it and what OH would be relevant. Good point about diesel fumes, however we have a zero-tolerance attitude to not using extraction on vehicles in the workshops. Also good point about skin examinations though. Something we should have done a while back really. Time to get someone trained up to inspect the lads nice soft hands.... Thanks again for your prompt responses. Time to face the onion!! BR Ian
Admin  
#7 Posted : 18 July 2008 16:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Ian If you want more on skin health surveillance get in touch. Our daughter, Helen, has just been awarded a PhD on "New techniques for occupational skin health surveillance", so might be worth talking to. (01386 832 311) Chris
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.